Teacher identification of reading difficulties among Arabic-speaking third graders in Israel: a pilot study.

IF 2.1 3区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION, SPECIAL
Annals of Dyslexia Pub Date : 2025-07-01 Epub Date: 2025-06-07 DOI:10.1007/s11881-025-00331-4
Sumod Khatib-Abbas, Orly Lipka
{"title":"Teacher identification of reading difficulties among Arabic-speaking third graders in Israel: a pilot study.","authors":"Sumod Khatib-Abbas, Orly Lipka","doi":"10.1007/s11881-025-00331-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Recently, concerns have been raised about Arabic-speaking students' reading achievement in Israel. Understanding language teachers' ability to identify poor reading skills is crucial to improve students' literacy outcomes. This pilot study examined three main aspects: the factors Arabic-speaking language teachers use to determine their third-grade students' word reading fluency and comprehension, their ability to identify students who need an intervention based on their reading performance, and the differences between teachers who make accurate and those who make inaccurate assessments of their students' literacy skills. The pilot study included a preliminary sample of 58 teachers and 112 students, with one to three students selected from each teacher's classroom for assessment. All participants were native Arabic speakers. Initial findings suggest that the main factors informing teachers' decisions on reading fluency and comprehension are vocabulary size (65.70%-77.70%), linguistic skills (63.9%-76%), and oral reading level (62%-74.30%), while less emphasis was placed on test scores (25.9%-31%) and parents' reports (13.9%-32.80%). Four distinct profiles of students at risk of reading difficulties (ARORD) emerged: low word reading fluency and comprehension (22%), low fluency only (12%), low comprehension only (4%), and a typical group (62%). Teachers identified students with difficulties in both areas with 80% accuracy, in reading comprehension with 60%, in word reading fluency with 0%, and in the typical group with 65%. The data indicated that teachers who taught more student-facing hours were better at identifying students ARORD. The implucations highlighte the need for teachers training focused on enhancing Arabic teachers' ability to accurately assess literacy skills and become familiar with different profiles of students' reading difficulties.</p>","PeriodicalId":47273,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Dyslexia","volume":" ","pages":"262-288"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12238085/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Dyslexia","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11881-025-00331-4","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/6/7 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SPECIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Recently, concerns have been raised about Arabic-speaking students' reading achievement in Israel. Understanding language teachers' ability to identify poor reading skills is crucial to improve students' literacy outcomes. This pilot study examined three main aspects: the factors Arabic-speaking language teachers use to determine their third-grade students' word reading fluency and comprehension, their ability to identify students who need an intervention based on their reading performance, and the differences between teachers who make accurate and those who make inaccurate assessments of their students' literacy skills. The pilot study included a preliminary sample of 58 teachers and 112 students, with one to three students selected from each teacher's classroom for assessment. All participants were native Arabic speakers. Initial findings suggest that the main factors informing teachers' decisions on reading fluency and comprehension are vocabulary size (65.70%-77.70%), linguistic skills (63.9%-76%), and oral reading level (62%-74.30%), while less emphasis was placed on test scores (25.9%-31%) and parents' reports (13.9%-32.80%). Four distinct profiles of students at risk of reading difficulties (ARORD) emerged: low word reading fluency and comprehension (22%), low fluency only (12%), low comprehension only (4%), and a typical group (62%). Teachers identified students with difficulties in both areas with 80% accuracy, in reading comprehension with 60%, in word reading fluency with 0%, and in the typical group with 65%. The data indicated that teachers who taught more student-facing hours were better at identifying students ARORD. The implucations highlighte the need for teachers training focused on enhancing Arabic teachers' ability to accurately assess literacy skills and become familiar with different profiles of students' reading difficulties.

教师对以色列阿拉伯语三年级学生阅读困难的识别:一项试点研究。
最近,人们开始关注以色列讲阿拉伯语的学生的阅读成绩。理解语言教师识别不良阅读技能的能力对于提高学生的读写能力至关重要。这项试点研究考察了三个主要方面:阿拉伯语教师用来确定三年级学生单词阅读流利性和理解的因素,他们根据阅读表现识别需要干预的学生的能力,以及对学生读写技能做出准确评估和不准确评估的教师之间的差异。试点研究包括58名教师和112名学生的初步样本,从每个教师的班级中选出一到三名学生进行评估。所有参与者的母语都是阿拉伯语。初步研究结果表明,影响教师决定阅读流畅性和理解能力的主要因素是词汇量(65.70%-77.70%)、语言技能(63.9%-76%)和口语阅读水平(62%-74.30%),而考试成绩(25.9%-31%)和家长报告(13.9%-32.80%)的重要性较低。有阅读困难风险(ARORD)的学生出现了四种不同的特征:阅读流畅性和理解能力低(22%),仅阅读流畅性低(12%),理解能力低(4%),以及典型群体(62%)。教师认为学生在这两个方面有困难的准确率为80%,在阅读理解方面为60%,在单词阅读流畅性方面为0%,在典型组中为65%。这些数据表明,教授更多面向学生时间的教师在识别学生ARORD方面做得更好。这些启示突出表明,需要对教师进行培训,重点是提高阿拉伯语教师准确评估识字技能的能力,并熟悉学生阅读困难的不同概况。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Annals of Dyslexia
Annals of Dyslexia Multiple-
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
8.70%
发文量
25
期刊介绍: Annals of Dyslexia is an interdisciplinary, peer-reviewed journal dedicated to the scientific study of dyslexia, its comorbid conditions; and theory-based practices on remediation, and intervention of dyslexia and related areas of written language disorders including spelling, composing and mathematics. Primary consideration for publication is given to original empirical studies, significant review, and well-documented reports of evidence-based effective practices. Only original papers are considered for publication.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信