Agricultural intensification through multiple-season farming: Effects on resiliency, food security and nutrition

IF 6 1区 经济学 Q1 AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS & POLICY
MingDa Li , Aurélie P. Harou , Averi Chakrabarti
{"title":"Agricultural intensification through multiple-season farming: Effects on resiliency, food security and nutrition","authors":"MingDa Li ,&nbsp;Aurélie P. Harou ,&nbsp;Averi Chakrabarti","doi":"10.1016/j.foodpol.2025.102833","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Agricultural intensification is key to improving food security, nutrition, and resilience. While most approaches focus on increasing productivity using improved inputs like fertilizers, an alternative, relatively understudied method involves multiple-season farming—cultivation across multiple periods in a year, enabled by conditions such as irrigation or alternative water access. Using panel data from the World Bank Living Standards Measurement Study (2010–2019) in Malawi, we examine how multiple-season farming shapes household food security, child nutrition, and resilience, defined as persistent food security over time. To mitigate selection bias, we employ fixed-effects and instrumental variable fixed-effects models. We find that multiple-season farming is statistically significantly associated with improved household food security (at the 1% level), particularly for asset-rich and male-headed households. Multiple season farmers cultivate more diverse crops and engage in market sales, which enhances their food supply. However, we find no significant impact on child nutrition. Using Cissé and Barrett’s (2018) moment-based method to estimate resilience, we provide suggestive evidence that multiple-season farming also positively affects household resilience. These results point to the potential of multiple-season farming to bolster food security and help farmers adapt to climate change. Our results also highlight the need for interventions that support poor and female-headed households to access the inputs needed for multiple season farming.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":321,"journal":{"name":"Food Policy","volume":"134 ","pages":"Article 102833"},"PeriodicalIF":6.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Food Policy","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306919225000375","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS & POLICY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Agricultural intensification is key to improving food security, nutrition, and resilience. While most approaches focus on increasing productivity using improved inputs like fertilizers, an alternative, relatively understudied method involves multiple-season farming—cultivation across multiple periods in a year, enabled by conditions such as irrigation or alternative water access. Using panel data from the World Bank Living Standards Measurement Study (2010–2019) in Malawi, we examine how multiple-season farming shapes household food security, child nutrition, and resilience, defined as persistent food security over time. To mitigate selection bias, we employ fixed-effects and instrumental variable fixed-effects models. We find that multiple-season farming is statistically significantly associated with improved household food security (at the 1% level), particularly for asset-rich and male-headed households. Multiple season farmers cultivate more diverse crops and engage in market sales, which enhances their food supply. However, we find no significant impact on child nutrition. Using Cissé and Barrett’s (2018) moment-based method to estimate resilience, we provide suggestive evidence that multiple-season farming also positively affects household resilience. These results point to the potential of multiple-season farming to bolster food security and help farmers adapt to climate change. Our results also highlight the need for interventions that support poor and female-headed households to access the inputs needed for multiple season farming.
多季农业集约化:对抵御力、粮食安全和营养的影响
农业集约化是改善粮食安全、营养和抵御力的关键。虽然大多数方法侧重于使用改良的肥料等投入物来提高生产率,但另一种研究相对较少的方法涉及多季农业,即在灌溉或替代水源等条件下,在一年的多个时期进行耕作。利用世界银行马拉维生活水平衡量研究(2010-2019年)的面板数据,我们研究了多季农业如何影响家庭粮食安全、儿童营养和抵御力(定义为长期持续的粮食安全)。为了减轻选择偏差,我们采用了固定效应和工具变量固定效应模型。我们发现,多季耕作在统计上与改善家庭粮食安全显著相关(在1%的水平上),特别是对于资产丰富和男性户主的家庭。多季农民种植更多样化的作物,并从事市场销售,这增加了他们的粮食供应。然而,我们没有发现对儿童营养有显著影响。使用ciss和巴雷特(2018)基于矩的方法来估计弹性,我们提供了启发性的证据,表明多季农业也会对家庭弹性产生积极影响。这些结果表明,多季农业在加强粮食安全和帮助农民适应气候变化方面具有潜力。我们的研究结果还强调,需要采取干预措施,支持贫困和女性户主家庭获得多季农业所需的投入。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Food Policy
Food Policy 管理科学-农业经济与政策
CiteScore
11.40
自引率
4.60%
发文量
128
审稿时长
62 days
期刊介绍: Food Policy is a multidisciplinary journal publishing original research and novel evidence on issues in the formulation, implementation, and evaluation of policies for the food sector in developing, transition, and advanced economies. Our main focus is on the economic and social aspect of food policy, and we prioritize empirical studies informing international food policy debates. Provided that articles make a clear and explicit contribution to food policy debates of international interest, we consider papers from any of the social sciences. Papers from other disciplines (e.g., law) will be considered only if they provide a key policy contribution, and are written in a style which is accessible to a social science readership.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信