Time banditry behavior in China: Dimension exploration and scale development

IF 7.5 2区 管理学 Q1 BUSINESS
Xiaoyue Niu (牛笑悦) , Guilan Yu (于桂兰) , Weihang Cao (曹伟航)
{"title":"Time banditry behavior in China: Dimension exploration and scale development","authors":"Xiaoyue Niu (牛笑悦) ,&nbsp;Guilan Yu (于桂兰) ,&nbsp;Weihang Cao (曹伟航)","doi":"10.1016/j.emj.2025.04.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Time banditry behavior (TBB) refers to employees participating in nonwork-related activities during work hours while still being compensated by the company for that time. Although there are existing scales to measure this behavior, their relevance in the Chinese context is constrained by the cultural and workplace differences between China and Western countries. Understanding employees’ TBB in China can help Chinese and global cross-cultural managers (e.g., European expatriate managers in China) achieve a more inclusive and efficient management style. Therefore, the researchers investigate the Chinese context’s structural dimensions and measurement of TBB. Study 1 used a qualitative approach to analyze primary data and identify four structural dimensions of TBB in China: Relaxation, Socialization, Private Affairs, and Self-Improvement. Study 2 developed and tested a four-dimensional scale of TBB using a quantitative method and five empirical samples, including one sample of subject matter experts and four samples of employed adults. This study provides evidence of reliability, content, convergent, and discriminant validity with constructs in TBB’s nomological network and incremental predictive ability of expected outcomes. This paper discusses the implications of the findings for both theoretical and practical applications.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48290,"journal":{"name":"European Management Journal","volume":"43 3","pages":"Pages 527-537"},"PeriodicalIF":7.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Management Journal","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S026323732500060X","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Time banditry behavior (TBB) refers to employees participating in nonwork-related activities during work hours while still being compensated by the company for that time. Although there are existing scales to measure this behavior, their relevance in the Chinese context is constrained by the cultural and workplace differences between China and Western countries. Understanding employees’ TBB in China can help Chinese and global cross-cultural managers (e.g., European expatriate managers in China) achieve a more inclusive and efficient management style. Therefore, the researchers investigate the Chinese context’s structural dimensions and measurement of TBB. Study 1 used a qualitative approach to analyze primary data and identify four structural dimensions of TBB in China: Relaxation, Socialization, Private Affairs, and Self-Improvement. Study 2 developed and tested a four-dimensional scale of TBB using a quantitative method and five empirical samples, including one sample of subject matter experts and four samples of employed adults. This study provides evidence of reliability, content, convergent, and discriminant validity with constructs in TBB’s nomological network and incremental predictive ability of expected outcomes. This paper discusses the implications of the findings for both theoretical and practical applications.
中国时间盗匪行为:维度探索与规模发展
时间盗抢行为(Time bandtry behavior, TBB)是指员工在工作时间内从事与工作无关的活动,但仍然获得公司补偿的行为。虽然已有衡量这种行为的尺度,但它们在中国情境中的相关性受到中西方文化和工作场所差异的限制。了解中国员工的TBB可以帮助中国和全球跨文化管理者(例如在中国的欧洲外籍管理者)实现更包容和高效的管理风格。因此,研究人员对中国语境中TBB的结构维度和测量方法进行了研究。研究1采用定性方法对原始数据进行分析,确定了中国TBB的四个结构维度:放松、社会化、私人事务和自我完善。研究二采用定量方法,采用5个实证样本,包括1个学科专家样本和4个在职成人样本,开发并检验了TBB的四维量表。本研究提供了可靠性、内容、收敛效度和区别效度与TBB的法则网络结构和预期结果的增量预测能力的证据。本文讨论了研究结果对理论和实际应用的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
12.90
自引率
5.30%
发文量
113
审稿时长
74 days
期刊介绍: The European Management Journal (EMJ) stands as a premier scholarly publication, disseminating cutting-edge research spanning all realms of management. EMJ articles challenge conventional wisdom through rigorously informed empirical and theoretical inquiries, offering fresh insights and innovative perspectives on key management themes while remaining accessible and engaging for a wide readership. EMJ articles embody intellectual curiosity and embrace diverse methodological approaches, yielding contributions that significantly influence both management theory and practice. We actively seek interdisciplinary research that integrates distinct research traditions to illuminate contemporary challenges within the expansive domain of European business and management. We strongly encourage cross-cultural investigations addressing the unique challenges faced by European management scholarship and practice in navigating global issues and contexts.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信