Amanda Joy Anderson, Sanjukta Das Smith, Suzanne S Dickerson, Sharon Hewner, Katia Noyes
{"title":"Cross-sector collaboration in transitional care of people experiencing homelessness: insights from an exploratory network analysis.","authors":"Amanda Joy Anderson, Sanjukta Das Smith, Suzanne S Dickerson, Sharon Hewner, Katia Noyes","doi":"10.1080/13561820.2025.2502594","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Interprofessional care coordinators informally collaborate across sectors to facilitate care of patients with multimorbidity and social complexity, such as in the case of ill-housed persons at hospital discharge. The complexity of homeless patients demands research on cross-sector collaborative interventions like medical respite, a cross-sector transitional care model. Relational Coordination (RC) and exploratory social network analysis were used to assess the cross-sector collaboration of a medical respite network (<i>N</i> = 15 organizations), by comparing administrative (<i>n</i> = 20) and frontline care coordinator (<i>n</i> = 41) behavior. Five elements of cross-sector collaboration were measured: collaboration frequency, communication, relationships, coordinating mechanisms, and role attributes. Data were collected by semi-structured interviews and surveys; analyzed with UCINet and RC indexing. Collaboration across sectors was evident in all network organizations. Administrative representatives were more connected than frontline (cohesion 0.95; 0.77). Both showed weak RC scores (<3.5 out of 5.0), value on accurate communication, problem-solving communication, and shared goals. Organizations with coordinating mechanisms (shared meetings, contracts, etc.) showed higher centrality <i>and</i> RC scores. Our study suggests ties between administrative and frontline workers and coordinating mechanisms optimize cross-sector collaboration in interprofessional teams. Intraorganizational behavioral differences between administrators and frontline care coordination professionals denote the need for further research individual provider attribute (sector, role, education, licensure) impact.</p>","PeriodicalId":50174,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Interprofessional Care","volume":" ","pages":"1-17"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Interprofessional Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13561820.2025.2502594","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Interprofessional care coordinators informally collaborate across sectors to facilitate care of patients with multimorbidity and social complexity, such as in the case of ill-housed persons at hospital discharge. The complexity of homeless patients demands research on cross-sector collaborative interventions like medical respite, a cross-sector transitional care model. Relational Coordination (RC) and exploratory social network analysis were used to assess the cross-sector collaboration of a medical respite network (N = 15 organizations), by comparing administrative (n = 20) and frontline care coordinator (n = 41) behavior. Five elements of cross-sector collaboration were measured: collaboration frequency, communication, relationships, coordinating mechanisms, and role attributes. Data were collected by semi-structured interviews and surveys; analyzed with UCINet and RC indexing. Collaboration across sectors was evident in all network organizations. Administrative representatives were more connected than frontline (cohesion 0.95; 0.77). Both showed weak RC scores (<3.5 out of 5.0), value on accurate communication, problem-solving communication, and shared goals. Organizations with coordinating mechanisms (shared meetings, contracts, etc.) showed higher centrality and RC scores. Our study suggests ties between administrative and frontline workers and coordinating mechanisms optimize cross-sector collaboration in interprofessional teams. Intraorganizational behavioral differences between administrators and frontline care coordination professionals denote the need for further research individual provider attribute (sector, role, education, licensure) impact.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Interprofessional Care disseminates research and new developments in the field of interprofessional education and practice. We welcome contributions containing an explicit interprofessional focus, and involving a range of settings, professions, and fields. Areas of practice covered include primary, community and hospital care, health education and public health, and beyond health and social care into fields such as criminal justice and primary/elementary education. Papers introducing additional interprofessional views, for example, from a community development or environmental design perspective, are welcome. The Journal is disseminated internationally and encourages submissions from around the world.