Health Care Utilization for Chronic Low Back Pain Among Medicaid Patients Versus Privately Insured Patients - A Retrospective Study.

IF 2.5 2区 医学 Q2 ANESTHESIOLOGY
Pain physician Pub Date : 2025-05-01
Robin Raju, Jesse Reynolds, Jiani Zhu, Sergio Uriel Mosquera Limas, Whinkie Leung
{"title":"Health Care Utilization for Chronic Low Back Pain Among Medicaid Patients Versus Privately Insured Patients - A Retrospective Study.","authors":"Robin Raju, Jesse Reynolds, Jiani Zhu, Sergio Uriel Mosquera Limas, Whinkie Leung","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Poor socioeconomic status and low access to care among patients have been identified as potential reasons for increased in disability associated with chronic low back pain.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study aims to explore health care utilization by patients who have chronic low back pain and come from poor socioeconomic backgrounds by comparing Medicaid patients to privately insured patients.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Retrospective study.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>A single-center academic hospital health system.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study reviewed the charts of all patients who had primary diagnoses of low back pain, were between the ages of 22 and 60 years old, and had been seen by 4 physiatrists from 2019 to 2023. Several health care utilization data were collected.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 424 patients, 206 (49%) patients had Medicaid insurance, and 218 (51%) patients had private insurance. Individuals in the Medicaid group attended more physical therapy sessions (mean: 7.1, median: 2) than did those with private insurance (mean: 5.2, median: 0, P < 0.001). With respect to \"no-show\" appointments, the Medicaid group (mean: 8.6, median: 4) had a significantly higher number of missed appointments than did the private group (mean: 3.0, median: 1, P < 0.001). Further regression analyses showed that patients in the Medicaid group with high Charlson Comorbidity Index scores had statistically significant high no-show counts (P < 0.0001). The median number of behavioral health sessions was significantly higher in the Medicaid group (mean: 6.8, median: 4) than in the private group (mean: 5.6, median: 3, P = 0.030). The number of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation sessions, magnetic resonance images, spine injections, and spine surgeries performed during the study period were similar for both groups.</p><p><strong>Limitations: </strong>The retrospective nature of the study and small sample size limit the ability to establish causation among observed variables. The health care utilization of privately insured patients as compared to Medicaid patients could have been underreported in this study, since the former could have gone to outside private practices for the management of low back pain.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study showed that Medicaid patients utilized health care to a similar if not greater extent than did privately insured patients. In addition, there was also a high \"no-show\" count in the Medicaid group.</p>","PeriodicalId":19841,"journal":{"name":"Pain physician","volume":"28 3","pages":"E271-E280"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pain physician","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Poor socioeconomic status and low access to care among patients have been identified as potential reasons for increased in disability associated with chronic low back pain.

Objectives: This study aims to explore health care utilization by patients who have chronic low back pain and come from poor socioeconomic backgrounds by comparing Medicaid patients to privately insured patients.

Study design: Retrospective study.

Setting: A single-center academic hospital health system.

Methods: This study reviewed the charts of all patients who had primary diagnoses of low back pain, were between the ages of 22 and 60 years old, and had been seen by 4 physiatrists from 2019 to 2023. Several health care utilization data were collected.

Results: Of the 424 patients, 206 (49%) patients had Medicaid insurance, and 218 (51%) patients had private insurance. Individuals in the Medicaid group attended more physical therapy sessions (mean: 7.1, median: 2) than did those with private insurance (mean: 5.2, median: 0, P < 0.001). With respect to "no-show" appointments, the Medicaid group (mean: 8.6, median: 4) had a significantly higher number of missed appointments than did the private group (mean: 3.0, median: 1, P < 0.001). Further regression analyses showed that patients in the Medicaid group with high Charlson Comorbidity Index scores had statistically significant high no-show counts (P < 0.0001). The median number of behavioral health sessions was significantly higher in the Medicaid group (mean: 6.8, median: 4) than in the private group (mean: 5.6, median: 3, P = 0.030). The number of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation sessions, magnetic resonance images, spine injections, and spine surgeries performed during the study period were similar for both groups.

Limitations: The retrospective nature of the study and small sample size limit the ability to establish causation among observed variables. The health care utilization of privately insured patients as compared to Medicaid patients could have been underreported in this study, since the former could have gone to outside private practices for the management of low back pain.

Conclusions: This study showed that Medicaid patients utilized health care to a similar if not greater extent than did privately insured patients. In addition, there was also a high "no-show" count in the Medicaid group.

医疗补助患者与私人保险患者慢性腰痛的医疗保健利用-一项回顾性研究。
背景:低社会经济地位和低获得护理的患者已被确定为慢性腰痛相关残疾增加的潜在原因。目的:本研究旨在通过比较医疗补助患者与私人保险患者,探讨社会经济背景较差的慢性腰痛患者的医疗保健利用情况。研究设计:回顾性研究。环境:单中心学术医院卫生系统。方法:本研究回顾了所有初诊为腰痛的患者,年龄在22岁至60岁之间,并在2019年至2023年期间就诊过4名物理医生。收集了一些医疗保健利用数据。结果:424例患者中,206例(49%)患者有医疗补助保险,218例(51%)患者有私人保险。医疗补助组的个体比私人保险组(平均:5.2,中位数:0,P < 0.001)参加了更多的物理治疗疗程(平均:7.1,中位数:2)。关于“缺席”预约,医疗补助组(平均值:8.6,中位数:4)的错过预约数量明显高于私人组(平均值:3.0,中位数:1,P < 0.001)。进一步的回归分析显示,在医疗补助组中,Charlson共病指数得分高的患者,其缺勤率有统计学意义(P < 0.0001)。医疗补助组(平均:6.8次,中位数:4次)的行为健康会话中位数显著高于私立组(平均:5.6次,中位数:3次,P = 0.030)。在研究期间,两组进行的物理医学和康复治疗、磁共振成像、脊柱注射和脊柱手术的次数相似。局限性:研究的回顾性和小样本量限制了在观察变量之间建立因果关系的能力。与医疗补助患者相比,私人保险患者的医疗保健利用率在本研究中可能被低估,因为前者可能会去外部私人诊所治疗腰痛。结论:本研究表明,医疗补助患者使用医疗保健的程度与私人保险患者相似,如果不是更大的话。此外,在医疗补助组中,“缺席”的人数也很高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Pain physician
Pain physician CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
21.60%
发文量
234
期刊介绍: Pain Physician Journal is the official publication of the American Society of Interventional Pain Physicians (ASIPP). The open access journal is published 6 times a year. Pain Physician Journal is a peer-reviewed, multi-disciplinary, open access journal written by and directed to an audience of interventional pain physicians, clinicians and basic scientists with an interest in interventional pain management and pain medicine. Pain Physician Journal presents the latest studies, research, and information vital to those in the emerging specialty of interventional pain management – and critical to the people they serve.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信