A Systematic Review of Self-Reported Pain Rating Scales for Children and Adolescents.

IF 2.5 2区 医学 Q2 ANESTHESIOLOGY
Pain physician Pub Date : 2025-05-01
Joshua Calvano, Reza Ehsanian, Jordan A Buttner, Adi Balk, Deborah Lai, Matt McGillivray, Todd Jaffe, Shuhan He
{"title":"A Systematic Review of Self-Reported Pain Rating Scales for Children and Adolescents.","authors":"Joshua Calvano, Reza Ehsanian, Jordan A Buttner, Adi Balk, Deborah Lai, Matt McGillivray, Todd Jaffe, Shuhan He","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Pain assessment in pediatric populations via self-report tools pose unique challenges given the patients' cognitive abilities and developmental status; however, the accurate measurement of pediatric pain is crucial in improving patient outcomes.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This review evaluates recent medical literature to better understand potential correlations and concordance exhibited by self-reported pain intensity assessment tools for children and adolescents in addition to assessing the viability and utility of electronic delivery modalities.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Systematic review without meta-analysis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An online database search was conducted utilizing PubMed/MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Google Scholar. Screened studies were limited to documents published between June 2004 and January 2022. All included studies were published in English, focused on pediatric self-report scales, and included comparisons of at least 2 different scales or various delivery modalities of the same scale. Risk of bias was assessed per the Cochrane Systematic Review Handbook.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 19 articles were selected for inclusion in this review. The findings indicate that pain scales incorporating visual aids, such as faces and colors, exhibit strong correlations with other pain assessment scales. However, discriminating between pediatric pain scales is still more nuanced, as evidenced by the contrasting paired correlation results shown between 2 similar face-based scales, underscoring the potential differences in the perception of fine details included within the visuals.</p><p><strong>Limitations: </strong>Limitations of this review include its focus on specific pain intensity metrics in children aged 3 to 18 without consideration of cognitive age or inclusion of articles about both acute and chronic pain. Study section and publication bias may have impacted the general findings, as is true of any systematic review.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Self-report pain scales that include visual aids such as colors and facial features may allow for the better assessment of pediatric pain than do pain scales without visual aids; however, additional research is required to fully elucidate the effects of such elements. This systematic review suggests that a universal, emoji-based electronic pain scale may enhance reporting accuracy and allow personalization for pediatric patients from various backgrounds.</p>","PeriodicalId":19841,"journal":{"name":"Pain physician","volume":"28 3","pages":"183-196"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pain physician","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Pain assessment in pediatric populations via self-report tools pose unique challenges given the patients' cognitive abilities and developmental status; however, the accurate measurement of pediatric pain is crucial in improving patient outcomes.

Objectives: This review evaluates recent medical literature to better understand potential correlations and concordance exhibited by self-reported pain intensity assessment tools for children and adolescents in addition to assessing the viability and utility of electronic delivery modalities.

Study design: Systematic review without meta-analysis.

Methods: An online database search was conducted utilizing PubMed/MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Google Scholar. Screened studies were limited to documents published between June 2004 and January 2022. All included studies were published in English, focused on pediatric self-report scales, and included comparisons of at least 2 different scales or various delivery modalities of the same scale. Risk of bias was assessed per the Cochrane Systematic Review Handbook.

Results: A total of 19 articles were selected for inclusion in this review. The findings indicate that pain scales incorporating visual aids, such as faces and colors, exhibit strong correlations with other pain assessment scales. However, discriminating between pediatric pain scales is still more nuanced, as evidenced by the contrasting paired correlation results shown between 2 similar face-based scales, underscoring the potential differences in the perception of fine details included within the visuals.

Limitations: Limitations of this review include its focus on specific pain intensity metrics in children aged 3 to 18 without consideration of cognitive age or inclusion of articles about both acute and chronic pain. Study section and publication bias may have impacted the general findings, as is true of any systematic review.

Conclusions: Self-report pain scales that include visual aids such as colors and facial features may allow for the better assessment of pediatric pain than do pain scales without visual aids; however, additional research is required to fully elucidate the effects of such elements. This systematic review suggests that a universal, emoji-based electronic pain scale may enhance reporting accuracy and allow personalization for pediatric patients from various backgrounds.

儿童和青少年自述疼痛评定量表的系统评价。
背景:考虑到患者的认知能力和发育状况,通过自我报告工具对儿科人群进行疼痛评估提出了独特的挑战;然而,儿科疼痛的准确测量是改善患者预后的关键。目的:本综述评估了最近的医学文献,以更好地了解儿童和青少年自我报告的疼痛强度评估工具所表现出的潜在相关性和一致性,以及评估电子递送方式的可行性和实用性。研究设计:不进行meta分析的系统评价。方法:利用PubMed/MEDLINE、EMBASE和谷歌Scholar进行在线数据库检索。筛选的研究仅限于2004年6月至2022年1月期间发表的文件。所有纳入的研究均以英文发表,重点是儿科自我报告量表,并包括至少2种不同量表或同一量表的不同分娩方式的比较。根据Cochrane系统评价手册评估偏倚风险。结果:共有19篇文章被纳入本综述。研究结果表明,包含视觉辅助的疼痛量表,如面部和颜色,与其他疼痛评估量表表现出很强的相关性。然而,区分儿童疼痛量表仍然是更加微妙的,正如在两个相似的基于面部的量表之间显示的对比成对相关性结果所证明的那样,强调了视觉中包含的细微细节感知的潜在差异。局限性:本综述的局限性包括其关注于3至18岁儿童的特定疼痛强度指标,未考虑认知年龄或纳入关于急性和慢性疼痛的文章。研究部分和发表偏倚可能会影响总体结果,任何系统综述都是如此。结论:与没有视觉辅助的疼痛量表相比,包括颜色和面部特征等视觉辅助的自述疼痛量表可以更好地评估儿科疼痛;然而,需要进一步的研究来充分阐明这些因素的影响。这一系统综述表明,一个通用的、基于表情符号的电子疼痛量表可以提高报告的准确性,并允许来自不同背景的儿科患者个性化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Pain physician
Pain physician CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
21.60%
发文量
234
期刊介绍: Pain Physician Journal is the official publication of the American Society of Interventional Pain Physicians (ASIPP). The open access journal is published 6 times a year. Pain Physician Journal is a peer-reviewed, multi-disciplinary, open access journal written by and directed to an audience of interventional pain physicians, clinicians and basic scientists with an interest in interventional pain management and pain medicine. Pain Physician Journal presents the latest studies, research, and information vital to those in the emerging specialty of interventional pain management – and critical to the people they serve.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信