{"title":"Daily Perceptions of Social Status and Aggressive and Prosocial Behaviors on Social Media: The Moderating Role of Narcissism.","authors":"Ying Wang, Skyler T Hawk, Natalie Wong","doi":"10.1007/s10964-025-02199-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Resource Control Theory suggests that adolescents strategically deploy aggressive and prosocial behaviors in response to perceived changes in social status. Given the bidirectional nature of interactions between adolescents and their social environment, however, it is also possible that these behaviors might shape their social standing in a reciprocal fashion. These processes were examined in the context of adolescents' aggressive and prosocial social media behavior, as was the potential for youth narcissism to moderate these links. Adolescents (N = 287, M<sub>age</sub> = 15.97, 57.1% female) completed a two-week daily diary study. Three pairs of lagged, within-person, bi-directional associations existed, including between perceived status frustration and public aggressive online behaviors, perceived status frustration and private prosocial behaviors, and perceived status satisfaction and private prosocial behaviors. Results support the notion of adaptive and vicious cycles of status attainment. Narcissistic rivalry predicted stronger increases in frustration-related public aggression, while narcissistic admiration predicted stronger increases in satisfaction-related private prosociality. Results highlight the complexity of adolescents' interpersonal dynamics online, from online aggression following perceived status frustrations to prosocial attempts to consolidate or regain status.</p>","PeriodicalId":17624,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Youth and Adolescence","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Youth and Adolescence","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-025-02199-4","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Resource Control Theory suggests that adolescents strategically deploy aggressive and prosocial behaviors in response to perceived changes in social status. Given the bidirectional nature of interactions between adolescents and their social environment, however, it is also possible that these behaviors might shape their social standing in a reciprocal fashion. These processes were examined in the context of adolescents' aggressive and prosocial social media behavior, as was the potential for youth narcissism to moderate these links. Adolescents (N = 287, Mage = 15.97, 57.1% female) completed a two-week daily diary study. Three pairs of lagged, within-person, bi-directional associations existed, including between perceived status frustration and public aggressive online behaviors, perceived status frustration and private prosocial behaviors, and perceived status satisfaction and private prosocial behaviors. Results support the notion of adaptive and vicious cycles of status attainment. Narcissistic rivalry predicted stronger increases in frustration-related public aggression, while narcissistic admiration predicted stronger increases in satisfaction-related private prosociality. Results highlight the complexity of adolescents' interpersonal dynamics online, from online aggression following perceived status frustrations to prosocial attempts to consolidate or regain status.
期刊介绍:
Journal of Youth and Adolescence provides a single, high-level medium of communication for psychologists, psychiatrists, biologists, criminologists, educators, and researchers in many other allied disciplines who address the subject of youth and adolescence. The journal publishes quantitative analyses, theoretical papers, and comprehensive review articles. The journal especially welcomes empirically rigorous papers that take policy implications seriously. Research need not have been designed to address policy needs, but manuscripts must address implications for the manner society formally (e.g., through laws, policies or regulations) or informally (e.g., through parents, peers, and social institutions) responds to the period of youth and adolescence.