Small Fiber Neuropathy in Long COVID: a cohort study with multimodal assessment and follow-up.

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Natalia Drobinska, Mayssam Nehme, Fréderic Assal, Emmanuel Laffitte, Idris Guessous, Agustina M Lascano
{"title":"Small Fiber Neuropathy in Long COVID: a cohort study with multimodal assessment and follow-up.","authors":"Natalia Drobinska, Mayssam Nehme, Fréderic Assal, Emmanuel Laffitte, Idris Guessous, Agustina M Lascano","doi":"10.1159/000546015","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Given the increasing number of patients suffering from pain associated with dysautonomic symptoms following severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection, we aimed to estimate the occurrence of small fiber neuropathy (SFN) in a cohort of long coronavirus disease 19 (COVID-19) patients reporting post-infectious neuropathic pain.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The study cohort included 18 patients suffering from symptoms suggestive of SFN (Neuropathic pain score DN4 ≥4) appearing after or during SARS-CoV-2 infection and lasting ≥90 days. Patients underwent multimodal SFN evaluation by skin biopsy, quantitative sensory testing (QST), laser evoked potential (LEP) recording and Electrochemical skin conductance (ESC; Sudoscan).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Out of 18 patients, 17 were analyzed. Participants' ages averaged 44+/-9 years, with 94% females. Fourteen (82%) had abnormal skin biopsy results. Notably, 12/17 (70%) patients presented with autonomic complaints, all of whom had abnormal skin biopsy results. At 6 months follow-up, 10/17 patients reported a subjective improvement in pain and/or dysautonomia with or without symptomatic pharmacological or non-pharmacological treatment. In our cohort, QST showed the highest sensibility (79%) and specificity (67%), followed by LEP (sensibility 71%, specificity 67%). ESC showed poor reliability in the screening of SFN with a sensibility of 7% and specificity of 50%.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The results of our study suggest that SFN may develop during or shortly after SARS-CoV-2 infection, provoking disabling sensory and dysautonomic symptoms that tend to persist for more than 6 months. Furthermore, our findings imply that non-invasive exams, are a useful complement to biopsy in the diagnostic process of SFN.</p>","PeriodicalId":12065,"journal":{"name":"European Neurology","volume":" ","pages":"1-18"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Neurology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000546015","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Given the increasing number of patients suffering from pain associated with dysautonomic symptoms following severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection, we aimed to estimate the occurrence of small fiber neuropathy (SFN) in a cohort of long coronavirus disease 19 (COVID-19) patients reporting post-infectious neuropathic pain.

Methods: The study cohort included 18 patients suffering from symptoms suggestive of SFN (Neuropathic pain score DN4 ≥4) appearing after or during SARS-CoV-2 infection and lasting ≥90 days. Patients underwent multimodal SFN evaluation by skin biopsy, quantitative sensory testing (QST), laser evoked potential (LEP) recording and Electrochemical skin conductance (ESC; Sudoscan).

Results: Out of 18 patients, 17 were analyzed. Participants' ages averaged 44+/-9 years, with 94% females. Fourteen (82%) had abnormal skin biopsy results. Notably, 12/17 (70%) patients presented with autonomic complaints, all of whom had abnormal skin biopsy results. At 6 months follow-up, 10/17 patients reported a subjective improvement in pain and/or dysautonomia with or without symptomatic pharmacological or non-pharmacological treatment. In our cohort, QST showed the highest sensibility (79%) and specificity (67%), followed by LEP (sensibility 71%, specificity 67%). ESC showed poor reliability in the screening of SFN with a sensibility of 7% and specificity of 50%.

Conclusion: The results of our study suggest that SFN may develop during or shortly after SARS-CoV-2 infection, provoking disabling sensory and dysautonomic symptoms that tend to persist for more than 6 months. Furthermore, our findings imply that non-invasive exams, are a useful complement to biopsy in the diagnostic process of SFN.

长冠状病毒小纤维神经病:一项多模式评估和随访的队列研究。
背景:考虑到越来越多的患者在严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒2 (SARS-CoV-2)感染后出现与自主神经异常症状相关的疼痛,我们旨在估计报告感染后神经性疼痛的长冠状病毒病19 (COVID-19)患者队列中小纤维神经病变(SFN)的发生率。方法:研究队列包括18例在SARS-CoV-2感染后或期间出现SFN症状(神经性疼痛评分DN4≥4)且持续≥90天的患者。通过皮肤活检、定量感觉测试(QST)、激光诱发电位(LEP)记录和皮肤电化学电导(ESC)对患者进行多模态SFN评估;Sudoscan)。结果:18例患者中,分析17例。参与者的平均年龄为44+/-9岁,其中94%为女性。14例(82%)皮肤活检结果异常。值得注意的是,12/17(70%)的患者表现为自主神经主诉,所有患者都有异常的皮肤活检结果。在6个月的随访中,有10/17名患者报告在接受或不接受症状性药物或非药物治疗时疼痛和/或自主神经异常的主观改善。在我们的队列中,QST表现出最高的敏感性(79%)和特异性(67%),其次是LEP(敏感性71%,特异性67%)。ESC筛查SFN的可靠性较差,敏感性为7%,特异性为50%。结论:我们的研究结果表明,SFN可能在SARS-CoV-2感染期间或之后不久发生,引发致残的感觉和自主神经异常症状,往往持续6个月以上。此外,我们的研究结果表明,在SFN的诊断过程中,非侵入性检查是活检的有效补充。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
European Neurology
European Neurology 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
4.20%
发文量
51
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: ''European Neurology'' publishes original papers, reviews and letters to the editor. Papers presented in this journal cover clinical aspects of diseases of the nervous system and muscles, as well as their neuropathological, biochemical, and electrophysiological basis. New diagnostic probes, pharmacological and surgical treatments are evaluated from clinical evidence and basic investigative studies. The journal also features original works and reviews on the history of neurology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信