Effects of blue-light percentage and carbon dioxide concentration on the water status and growth of chrysanthemum and begonia cuttings in vertical indoor propagation systems
{"title":"Effects of blue-light percentage and carbon dioxide concentration on the water status and growth of chrysanthemum and begonia cuttings in vertical indoor propagation systems","authors":"Sofía Gómez, Celina Gómez","doi":"10.1016/j.scienta.2025.114201","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Managing environmental conditions to limit water loss of cuttings during the initial propagation phase (“acclimation”) is critical. Using chrysanthemum (<em>Chrysanthemum indicum</em>) and begonia (<em>Begonia × hiemalis</em>) cuttings, our objectives were to characterize 1) short-term effects of blue light [15 % to 60 % at a photosynthetic photon flux density (PPFD) of 70 µmol·m<sup>–</sup><sup>2</sup>·s<sup>–1</sup>] on water use (Experiment 1); and 2) short- and long-term effects on water use and growth of cuttings acclimated under two blue-light treatments [21 % (21B) or 45 % (45B)] at two carbon dioxide (CO<sub>2</sub>) concentrations (ambient or high at ∼500 or 1200 μmol·mol<sup>–1</sup>, respectively) (Experiment 2). Results from Experiment 1 generally showed that increasing blue light increased water loss and water uptake by unrooted cuttings. However, no differences were measured in stomatal conductance (<em>g<sub>s</sub></em>) or transpiration (<em>E</em>), suggesting that stomata may be unresponsive to blue light during acclimation. In contrast, increasing blue light linearly increased <em>g<sub>s</sub></em> and <em>E</em> of rooted begonia cuttings, but no differences were measured in water use. There were few growth differences in response to blue light at the two CO<sub>2</sub> concentrations evaluated in Experiment 2, suggesting that cuttings may be more responsive to some environmental stimuli after initial root development. Various responses were species-specific. For example, begonia cuttings were shorter and produced smaller leaves under 45B than 21B when acclimated under high CO<sub>2</sub>. In contrast, chrysanthemum cuttings were slightly taller under 45B and high CO<sub>2</sub> but were otherwise generally unresponsive to blue light. Evapotranspiration only increased in response to blue light when begonia cuttings were acclimated under high CO<sub>2</sub>. Overall, our findings show that blue-light percentage and CO<sub>2</sub> concentration may not have large effects on rooting and growth of ornamental cuttings during acclimation, but some physiological and water-use differences can be expected, particularly under different blue-light percentages.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":21679,"journal":{"name":"Scientia Horticulturae","volume":"347 ","pages":"Article 114201"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scientia Horticulturae","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S030442382500250X","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HORTICULTURE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Managing environmental conditions to limit water loss of cuttings during the initial propagation phase (“acclimation”) is critical. Using chrysanthemum (Chrysanthemum indicum) and begonia (Begonia × hiemalis) cuttings, our objectives were to characterize 1) short-term effects of blue light [15 % to 60 % at a photosynthetic photon flux density (PPFD) of 70 µmol·m–2·s–1] on water use (Experiment 1); and 2) short- and long-term effects on water use and growth of cuttings acclimated under two blue-light treatments [21 % (21B) or 45 % (45B)] at two carbon dioxide (CO2) concentrations (ambient or high at ∼500 or 1200 μmol·mol–1, respectively) (Experiment 2). Results from Experiment 1 generally showed that increasing blue light increased water loss and water uptake by unrooted cuttings. However, no differences were measured in stomatal conductance (gs) or transpiration (E), suggesting that stomata may be unresponsive to blue light during acclimation. In contrast, increasing blue light linearly increased gs and E of rooted begonia cuttings, but no differences were measured in water use. There were few growth differences in response to blue light at the two CO2 concentrations evaluated in Experiment 2, suggesting that cuttings may be more responsive to some environmental stimuli after initial root development. Various responses were species-specific. For example, begonia cuttings were shorter and produced smaller leaves under 45B than 21B when acclimated under high CO2. In contrast, chrysanthemum cuttings were slightly taller under 45B and high CO2 but were otherwise generally unresponsive to blue light. Evapotranspiration only increased in response to blue light when begonia cuttings were acclimated under high CO2. Overall, our findings show that blue-light percentage and CO2 concentration may not have large effects on rooting and growth of ornamental cuttings during acclimation, but some physiological and water-use differences can be expected, particularly under different blue-light percentages.
期刊介绍:
Scientia Horticulturae is an international journal publishing research related to horticultural crops. Articles in the journal deal with open or protected production of vegetables, fruits, edible fungi and ornamentals under temperate, subtropical and tropical conditions. Papers in related areas (biochemistry, micropropagation, soil science, plant breeding, plant physiology, phytopathology, etc.) are considered, if they contain information of direct significance to horticulture. Papers on the technical aspects of horticulture (engineering, crop processing, storage, transport etc.) are accepted for publication only if they relate directly to the living product. In the case of plantation crops, those yielding a product that may be used fresh (e.g. tropical vegetables, citrus, bananas, and other fruits) will be considered, while those papers describing the processing of the product (e.g. rubber, tobacco, and quinine) will not. The scope of the journal includes all horticultural crops but does not include speciality crops such as, medicinal crops or forestry crops, such as bamboo. Basic molecular studies without any direct application in horticulture will not be considered for this journal.