{"title":"Undergraduate nursing students' perceptions of debriefing sessions in simulation-based learning: A systematic review","authors":"Leanne Glennie RN","doi":"10.1016/j.teln.2025.03.018","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>The aim of this systematic review is to determine how debriefing processes, perceived by undergraduate nursing students, affect confidence and learning outcomes from qualitative studies conducted between 2019 and 2023.</div></div><div><h3>REVIEW METHODS</h3><div>This systematic review is aligned with the PRSIMA 2020 search strategy and includes data from only qualitative studies. Previous studies on perceived outcomes surrounding effective debriefing processes within simulation-based learning has predominantly focused on quantitative and mixed method studies.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A total of 358 primary studies were obtained from the initial search: CINAHL (n = 64), ERIC (n = 3), MEDLINE (ProQuest) (n = 42), SCOPUS (n = 101), and WEB OF SCIENCE (n = 137); and hand searched articles (n = 11). A total of 5 studies were included in the review from which 3 underlying commonalities were identified: Self-awareness and self-confidence; Safe Learning Environment; and Confidence for Clinical Practice.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>The debriefing process is perceived as having a positive effect on students’; however, a 2-step approach to debriefing in which self-reflection prior to group discussion on their performance is preferred.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":46287,"journal":{"name":"Teaching and Learning in Nursing","volume":"20 3","pages":"Pages e907-e914"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Teaching and Learning in Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1557308725001143","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objectives
The aim of this systematic review is to determine how debriefing processes, perceived by undergraduate nursing students, affect confidence and learning outcomes from qualitative studies conducted between 2019 and 2023.
REVIEW METHODS
This systematic review is aligned with the PRSIMA 2020 search strategy and includes data from only qualitative studies. Previous studies on perceived outcomes surrounding effective debriefing processes within simulation-based learning has predominantly focused on quantitative and mixed method studies.
Results
A total of 358 primary studies were obtained from the initial search: CINAHL (n = 64), ERIC (n = 3), MEDLINE (ProQuest) (n = 42), SCOPUS (n = 101), and WEB OF SCIENCE (n = 137); and hand searched articles (n = 11). A total of 5 studies were included in the review from which 3 underlying commonalities were identified: Self-awareness and self-confidence; Safe Learning Environment; and Confidence for Clinical Practice.
Conclusion
The debriefing process is perceived as having a positive effect on students’; however, a 2-step approach to debriefing in which self-reflection prior to group discussion on their performance is preferred.
期刊介绍:
Teaching and Learning in Nursing is the Official Journal of the National Organization of Associate Degree Nursing. The journal is dedicated to the advancement of Associate Degree Nursing education and practice, and promotes collaboration in charting the future of health care education and delivery. Topics include: - Managing Different Learning Styles - New Faculty Mentoring - Legal Issues - Research - Legislative Issues - Instructional Design Strategies - Leadership, Management Roles - Unique Funding for Programs and Faculty