Guided university debate increases long-term gender knowledge and gender sensitivity towards patients among nursing students

IF 1.9 Q2 NURSING
Asier Zamakola RN , Haritz Arrieta PhD , Marta Arrue PhD, RN , Isabel Trespaderne PhD, RN , Ainitze Labaka PhD, RN
{"title":"Guided university debate increases long-term gender knowledge and gender sensitivity towards patients among nursing students","authors":"Asier Zamakola RN ,&nbsp;Haritz Arrieta PhD ,&nbsp;Marta Arrue PhD, RN ,&nbsp;Isabel Trespaderne PhD, RN ,&nbsp;Ainitze Labaka PhD, RN","doi":"10.1016/j.teln.2025.03.014","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Gender awareness in health is a complex competence requiring deep reflexive learning. Several studies have found this competence is not as yet reflected in nursing graduate's clinical practice.</div></div><div><h3>Aim</h3><div>To foster the gender awareness of nursing students using an active methodology: guided university debate.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A quasi-experimental study with pre-test and post-test design was used. A total of 126 first-year undergraduate students responded to three scenarios on the legitimation of a (female or male) patient's pain and completed validated scales for measuring gender sensitivity, gender role ideology and declarative gender knowledge at three time points: prior to the debate, immediately after the debate and six months later.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Declarative gender knowledge was higher than at pretest both immediately after the end of the intervention and six months later. Gender sensitivity and gender role ideology were higher 6 months after the intervention than at pretest.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Debate is an effective way of increasing declarative gender knowledge in the medium and long term. It also seems to encourage a willingness to continue developing long-term gender sensitivity.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":46287,"journal":{"name":"Teaching and Learning in Nursing","volume":"20 3","pages":"Pages e877-e885"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Teaching and Learning in Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1557308725001118","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Gender awareness in health is a complex competence requiring deep reflexive learning. Several studies have found this competence is not as yet reflected in nursing graduate's clinical practice.

Aim

To foster the gender awareness of nursing students using an active methodology: guided university debate.

Methods

A quasi-experimental study with pre-test and post-test design was used. A total of 126 first-year undergraduate students responded to three scenarios on the legitimation of a (female or male) patient's pain and completed validated scales for measuring gender sensitivity, gender role ideology and declarative gender knowledge at three time points: prior to the debate, immediately after the debate and six months later.

Results

Declarative gender knowledge was higher than at pretest both immediately after the end of the intervention and six months later. Gender sensitivity and gender role ideology were higher 6 months after the intervention than at pretest.

Conclusions

Debate is an effective way of increasing declarative gender knowledge in the medium and long term. It also seems to encourage a willingness to continue developing long-term gender sensitivity.
引导大学辩论增加长期性别知识和性别敏感性护理学生对病人
卫生领域的性别意识是一项复杂的能力,需要深入的反身性学习。一些研究发现,这种能力尚未在护理毕业生的临床实践中得到体现。目的采用积极的方法:引导大学辩论,培养护理专业学生的性别意识。方法采用准实验研究,采用前测和后测设计。共有126名一年级本科生在辩论前、辩论后和辩论后6个月三个时间点对(女性或男性)患者疼痛合法化的三个场景进行了回应,并完成了有效的性别敏感性、性别角色意识形态和陈述性性别知识的测量量表。结果干预结束后即刻及6个月后的陈述性性别知识均高于前测。干预后6个月性别敏感性和性别角色意识均高于前测。结论辩论是提高陈述性性别知识的中长期有效途径。它似乎也鼓励了继续发展长期性别敏感性的意愿。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
10.50%
发文量
119
审稿时长
37 days
期刊介绍: Teaching and Learning in Nursing is the Official Journal of the National Organization of Associate Degree Nursing. The journal is dedicated to the advancement of Associate Degree Nursing education and practice, and promotes collaboration in charting the future of health care education and delivery. Topics include: - Managing Different Learning Styles - New Faculty Mentoring - Legal Issues - Research - Legislative Issues - Instructional Design Strategies - Leadership, Management Roles - Unique Funding for Programs and Faculty
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信