Validity of the Five Times Sit to Stand Test in Healthy Older Men.

IF 1.4 4区 心理学 Q4 PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL
Dennis W Klima, Michael Rabel, Joshua Bigelow, Matthew Greene, Phillip Smith, Peter Tam
{"title":"Validity of the Five Times Sit to Stand Test in Healthy Older Men.","authors":"Dennis W Klima, Michael Rabel, Joshua Bigelow, Matthew Greene, Phillip Smith, Peter Tam","doi":"10.1177/00315125251347791","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> The Five Times Sit to Stand test (FTSST) is an outcome measure designed to examine functional lower extremity strength. While the test has been utilized with a variety of populations, less is known about its validity properties with parallel instrumented balance and isokinetic muscle performance in older men. The objective of the study was to determine if the FTSST demonstrates concurrent validity with both instrumented and functional measures of physical performance in older community-dwelling men. A second aim was to compare the measure in faller versus nonfaller performance and assess its predictive capacity for falls. <b>Methods:</b> Thirty-one healthy community-dwelling men were enrolled in the study (mean age 68.5 ± 5.5). A cross-sectional design was utilized. Participants completed a circuit of six physical performance tests, including the FTSST, Timed Up and Go Test (TUG), the NeuroCom Motor Control (MCT) and Sensory Organization (SOT) Tests, the Activities -Specific Balance Confidence Scale (ABC), and knee isokinetic strength. <b>Results:</b> The FTSST significantly predicted falls and correlated with the TUG (r = .59; <i>p</i> < .001), MCT composite score (r = .39; <i>p</i> = .03), and knee extension peak torque (-.41; <i>p</i> = .03). Fallers demonstrated significantly slower FTSST times (13.1 ± 2.7 seconds vs. 10.4 ± 3.2 seconds.; <i>p</i> = .017). <b>Significance:</b> The FTSST demonstrates concurrent validity with the MCT, TUG and knee extension peak torque. FTSST performance was significantly slower among fallers versus non faller participants and predicted faller status. Exploratory findings support the continued use of the tool for functional screening activities in older men.</p>","PeriodicalId":19869,"journal":{"name":"Perceptual and Motor Skills","volume":" ","pages":"315125251347791"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Perceptual and Motor Skills","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00315125251347791","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The Five Times Sit to Stand test (FTSST) is an outcome measure designed to examine functional lower extremity strength. While the test has been utilized with a variety of populations, less is known about its validity properties with parallel instrumented balance and isokinetic muscle performance in older men. The objective of the study was to determine if the FTSST demonstrates concurrent validity with both instrumented and functional measures of physical performance in older community-dwelling men. A second aim was to compare the measure in faller versus nonfaller performance and assess its predictive capacity for falls. Methods: Thirty-one healthy community-dwelling men were enrolled in the study (mean age 68.5 ± 5.5). A cross-sectional design was utilized. Participants completed a circuit of six physical performance tests, including the FTSST, Timed Up and Go Test (TUG), the NeuroCom Motor Control (MCT) and Sensory Organization (SOT) Tests, the Activities -Specific Balance Confidence Scale (ABC), and knee isokinetic strength. Results: The FTSST significantly predicted falls and correlated with the TUG (r = .59; p < .001), MCT composite score (r = .39; p = .03), and knee extension peak torque (-.41; p = .03). Fallers demonstrated significantly slower FTSST times (13.1 ± 2.7 seconds vs. 10.4 ± 3.2 seconds.; p = .017). Significance: The FTSST demonstrates concurrent validity with the MCT, TUG and knee extension peak torque. FTSST performance was significantly slower among fallers versus non faller participants and predicted faller status. Exploratory findings support the continued use of the tool for functional screening activities in older men.

老年健康男性五次坐立试验的有效性。
背景:五次坐立测试(FTSST)是一项旨在检查功能性下肢力量的结果测量。虽然该测试已用于各种人群,但对其在老年男性平行仪器平衡和等速肌肉表现方面的有效性知之甚少。本研究的目的是确定FTSST是否与社区老年男性身体表现的仪器测量和功能测量同时有效。第二个目的是比较跌倒者和非跌倒者的表现,并评估其对跌倒的预测能力。方法:31名健康的社区男性(平均年龄68.5±5.5岁)入组研究。采用横截面设计。参与者完成了六项体能测试,包括FTSST、计时起跑测试(TUG)、神经网络运动控制(MCT)和感觉组织(SOT)测试、活动特定平衡信心量表(ABC)和膝关节等动力量。结果:FTSST对跌倒有显著预测作用,与TUG有显著相关(r = 0.59;p < 0.001), MCT综合评分(r = 0.39;P = .03),膝关节伸展峰值扭矩(-.41;P = .03)。落水者的FTSST时间明显较慢(13.1±2.7秒vs. 10.4±3.2秒)。P = .017)。意义:FTSST与MCT、TUG和膝关节伸展峰值扭矩同时有效。摔倒者与非摔倒者相比,FTSST表现明显较慢,并预测了摔倒者的状态。探索性发现支持在老年男性中继续使用该工具进行功能筛查活动。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Perceptual and Motor Skills
Perceptual and Motor Skills PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL-
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
6.20%
发文量
110
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信