The Physical and Psychological Effects of Kinesiotaping in Patients With Chronic Low Back Pain.

IF 1.8 4区 心理学 Q4 PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL
Özgür Nadiye Karaman, Emine Aslan Telci, Fatih Özden, Hüseyin Aydoğmuş
{"title":"The Physical and Psychological Effects of Kinesiotaping in Patients With Chronic Low Back Pain.","authors":"Özgür Nadiye Karaman, Emine Aslan Telci, Fatih Özden, Hüseyin Aydoğmuş","doi":"10.1177/00315125251347481","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>As no other investigators have holistically addressed kinesiotaping (KT) effects on physical and psychological measures in patients with chronic low back pain (CLBP). Our aim in the present study was to investigate the effects of KT application on pain, flexibility, function, back awareness, fear-avoidance, anxiety, and depression in patients with CLBP. We conducted a single-blind, randomized controlled trial with 52 patients with CLBP who were randomized to either or an electrotherapy (ET) group (<i>n</i> = 26) or a KT + ET group (<i>n</i> = 26). The ET group received only conventional electrophysical interventions for two weeks, while the KT + ET group received kinesiotaping plus the electro-physical interventions. At baseline, after the second week (post-treatment), and at an eighth-week follow-up, participants were given the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) for self-reported pain, the Fremantle Low Back Awareness Questionnaire (FreBAQ), the Five Times Sit-to-Stand Test (FTST), the Timed Up and Go Test (TUG), the Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire (RMDQ), the Modified Schober Test (mST), the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS), and the Fear Avoidance Beliefs Questionnaire (FABQ). The KT + ET group showed greater improvement than the ET group on the VAS, TUG, FTST, FreBAQ, and FABQ and was significantly improved at both the second and eighth weeks (<i>p</i> < .05). The subjective function (RMDQ) score of the KT group was better at the eighth week (<i>p</i> < .05). There was no significant difference between the groups on the mST, HADS-D, and HADS-A (<i>p</i> > .05). However, both the KT + ET and ET groups showed significant improvement on the HADS-D and HAD-S-A (<i>p</i> < .05). These results show that the KT application provided additional benefits relative to ET alone in participants' perceived pain, and their objective and subjective functioning, low back awareness, and fear avoidance.</p>","PeriodicalId":19869,"journal":{"name":"Perceptual and Motor Skills","volume":" ","pages":"315125251347481"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Perceptual and Motor Skills","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00315125251347481","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

As no other investigators have holistically addressed kinesiotaping (KT) effects on physical and psychological measures in patients with chronic low back pain (CLBP). Our aim in the present study was to investigate the effects of KT application on pain, flexibility, function, back awareness, fear-avoidance, anxiety, and depression in patients with CLBP. We conducted a single-blind, randomized controlled trial with 52 patients with CLBP who were randomized to either or an electrotherapy (ET) group (n = 26) or a KT + ET group (n = 26). The ET group received only conventional electrophysical interventions for two weeks, while the KT + ET group received kinesiotaping plus the electro-physical interventions. At baseline, after the second week (post-treatment), and at an eighth-week follow-up, participants were given the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) for self-reported pain, the Fremantle Low Back Awareness Questionnaire (FreBAQ), the Five Times Sit-to-Stand Test (FTST), the Timed Up and Go Test (TUG), the Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire (RMDQ), the Modified Schober Test (mST), the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS), and the Fear Avoidance Beliefs Questionnaire (FABQ). The KT + ET group showed greater improvement than the ET group on the VAS, TUG, FTST, FreBAQ, and FABQ and was significantly improved at both the second and eighth weeks (p < .05). The subjective function (RMDQ) score of the KT group was better at the eighth week (p < .05). There was no significant difference between the groups on the mST, HADS-D, and HADS-A (p > .05). However, both the KT + ET and ET groups showed significant improvement on the HADS-D and HAD-S-A (p < .05). These results show that the KT application provided additional benefits relative to ET alone in participants' perceived pain, and their objective and subjective functioning, low back awareness, and fear avoidance.

慢性腰痛患者运动带子的生理和心理影响。
由于没有其他研究人员从整体上解决了运动磁带(KT)对慢性腰痛(CLBP)患者生理和心理测量的影响。我们本研究的目的是探讨KT应用对CLBP患者疼痛、柔韧性、功能、背部意识、恐惧回避、焦虑和抑郁的影响。我们对52例CLBP患者进行了一项单盲、随机对照试验,他们被随机分为电疗(ET)组(n = 26)或KT + ET组(n = 26)。ET组只接受常规电物理干预,为期两周,而KT + ET组接受运动胶带和电物理干预。在基线、第二周后(治疗后)和第八周随访时,参与者被给予自我报告疼痛的视觉模拟量表(VAS)、弗里曼特尔低背意识问卷(FreBAQ)、五次坐立测试(FTST)、起身时间测试(TUG)、罗兰莫里斯残疾问卷(RMDQ)、修正Schober测试(mST)、医院焦虑和抑郁量表(HADS)和恐惧回避信念问卷(FABQ)。KT + ET组在VAS、TUG、FTST、FreBAQ和FABQ上的改善明显高于ET组,且在第2周和第8周均有显著改善(p < 0.05)。KT组的主观功能(RMDQ)评分在第8周时优于对照组(p < 0.05)。各组间mST、HADS-D、HADS-A评分差异无统计学意义(p < 0.05)。然而,KT + ET组和ET组在HADS-D和hads - a方面均有显著改善(p < 0.05)。这些结果表明,相对于单纯的ET, KT应用在参与者的感知疼痛、客观和主观功能、腰背意识和恐惧回避方面提供了额外的好处。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Perceptual and Motor Skills
Perceptual and Motor Skills PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL-
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
6.20%
发文量
110
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信