Relationship Between Quality of Life, Level of Physical Activity, Physical Fitness, and Body Composition on the Academic Performance of High School Students in an Integrated Educational System.

IF 1.4 4区 心理学 Q4 PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL
Jeann C Gazolla, João B Ferreira-Júnior, Samuel Encarnação, André C Schneider, António M Monteiro, José E Teixeira, Pedro Forte, João P Verbena E Oliveira, Diego A Borba, Carlos M A Costa, Carlos A Vieira
{"title":"Relationship Between Quality of Life, Level of Physical Activity, Physical Fitness, and Body Composition on the Academic Performance of High School Students in an Integrated Educational System.","authors":"Jeann C Gazolla, João B Ferreira-Júnior, Samuel Encarnação, André C Schneider, António M Monteiro, José E Teixeira, Pedro Forte, João P Verbena E Oliveira, Diego A Borba, Carlos M A Costa, Carlos A Vieira","doi":"10.1177/00315125251344404","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> Adolescence is a critical period for the development of physical and cognitive health. Understanding how lifestyle and physical health parameters relate to academic performance and quality of life may inform school-based interventions. <b>Purpose:</b> This study aimed to evaluate the relationship between physical activity level (PAL), quality of life (QoL), physical fitness (PF), strength, speed and agility, body composition, and academic performance (AP) in high school students. <b>Research Design:</b> A cross-sectional, correlational study using multiple linear regression models to assess predictive relationships. <b>Study Sample:</b> 365 students (aged 16.93 ± 0.94 years) participated in the study. <b>Data Collection and Analysis:</b> Evaluations included Body Mass Index (BMI); PAL; QoL; PF (handgrip strength, countermovement vertical jump, and agility); and AP. A multiple linear regression was conducted using AP as the dependent variable, with BMI, jump performance, agility, handgrip strength, and PAL scores as predictors. Five additional multiple linear regressions were performed, each with a QoL domain as the dependent variable, and the same set of predictors as in the AP model. Participants' age and sex were included as covariates in all models. <b>Results:</b> Significant predictive capacity was observed for AP (<i>F</i> = 2.22, <i>p</i> = .028, R = 0.31, R<sup>2</sup> = 0.093) and two QoL domains: physical health (F = 2.32, <i>p</i> = .021, R = 0.28, R<sup>2</sup> = 0.079) and psychological health (F = 2.32 and <i>p</i> = .021, R = 0.28, R<sup>2</sup> = 0.079); however, with weak correlation coefficients (0.2 ≤ R <0.4). Only jump performance and age significantly affected the AP model (β = 0.038, <i>p</i> = .014) and the psychological health domain model (β = 0.48, <i>p</i> = .018). <b>Conclusions:</b> The predictors explained 9.3% of the variance in AP and 7.9% of the variance in physical health and psychological health in QoL domains, suggesting that additional factors (e.g., socioeconomic status, dietary habits) may play a role. The findings highlight the importance of multifactorial approaches in future research.</p>","PeriodicalId":19869,"journal":{"name":"Perceptual and Motor Skills","volume":" ","pages":"315125251344404"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Perceptual and Motor Skills","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00315125251344404","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Adolescence is a critical period for the development of physical and cognitive health. Understanding how lifestyle and physical health parameters relate to academic performance and quality of life may inform school-based interventions. Purpose: This study aimed to evaluate the relationship between physical activity level (PAL), quality of life (QoL), physical fitness (PF), strength, speed and agility, body composition, and academic performance (AP) in high school students. Research Design: A cross-sectional, correlational study using multiple linear regression models to assess predictive relationships. Study Sample: 365 students (aged 16.93 ± 0.94 years) participated in the study. Data Collection and Analysis: Evaluations included Body Mass Index (BMI); PAL; QoL; PF (handgrip strength, countermovement vertical jump, and agility); and AP. A multiple linear regression was conducted using AP as the dependent variable, with BMI, jump performance, agility, handgrip strength, and PAL scores as predictors. Five additional multiple linear regressions were performed, each with a QoL domain as the dependent variable, and the same set of predictors as in the AP model. Participants' age and sex were included as covariates in all models. Results: Significant predictive capacity was observed for AP (F = 2.22, p = .028, R = 0.31, R2 = 0.093) and two QoL domains: physical health (F = 2.32, p = .021, R = 0.28, R2 = 0.079) and psychological health (F = 2.32 and p = .021, R = 0.28, R2 = 0.079); however, with weak correlation coefficients (0.2 ≤ R <0.4). Only jump performance and age significantly affected the AP model (β = 0.038, p = .014) and the psychological health domain model (β = 0.48, p = .018). Conclusions: The predictors explained 9.3% of the variance in AP and 7.9% of the variance in physical health and psychological health in QoL domains, suggesting that additional factors (e.g., socioeconomic status, dietary habits) may play a role. The findings highlight the importance of multifactorial approaches in future research.

生活质量、体育活动水平、身体素质和身体成分对综合教育系统中学生学业成绩的影响
背景:青春期是身体和认知健康发展的关键时期。了解生活方式和身体健康参数与学习成绩和生活质量的关系,可以为学校干预提供信息。目的:探讨高中生身体活动水平(PAL)、生活质量(QoL)、体质(PF)、力量、速度和敏捷性、身体成分和学业成绩(AP)之间的关系。研究设计:一项使用多元线性回归模型评估预测关系的横断面相关性研究。研究样本:365名学生(年龄16.93±0.94岁)参与研究。数据收集和分析:评估包括身体质量指数(BMI);朋友;生命质量;PF(握力,反向垂直跳跃,敏捷性);以AP为因变量,以BMI、跳跃表现、敏捷性、握力和PAL评分为预测因子,进行多元线性回归。另外进行了五个多元线性回归,每个回归都以生活质量域作为因变量,并使用与AP模型相同的一组预测因子。所有模型都将参与者的年龄和性别作为协变量。结果:AP (F = 2.22, p = 0.028, R = 0.31, R2 = 0.093)和生理健康(F = 2.32, p = 0.021, R = 0.28, R2 = 0.079)和心理健康(F = 2.32, p = 0.021, R = 0.28, R2 = 0.079)具有显著的预测能力;然而,与弱相关系数(0.2≤R p = 0.014)和心理健康领域模型(β = 0.48, p = 0.018)。结论:这些预测因子解释了9.3%的AP和7.9%的生理健康和心理健康在生活质量领域的差异,表明其他因素(如社会经济地位、饮食习惯)可能起作用。研究结果强调了多因素方法在未来研究中的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Perceptual and Motor Skills
Perceptual and Motor Skills PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL-
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
6.20%
发文量
110
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信