Development of a Laser Device for the Assessment of Trunk Position Sense: Normative Data and Concurrent Validation With Verticality Perception Tests in Healthy Individuals.

IF 1.4 4区 心理学 Q4 PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL
Flávia Guirro Zuliani, Leandro Ribeiro Alves, Fabio Somera Junior, Andressa Rastrelo Rezende, Jussara Almeida de Oliveira Baggio, Rodrigo Bazan, Marcos Massao Shimano, Luciane Aparecida Pascucci Sande de Souza, Gustavo José Luvizutto
{"title":"Development of a Laser Device for the Assessment of Trunk Position Sense: Normative Data and Concurrent Validation With Verticality Perception Tests in Healthy Individuals.","authors":"Flávia Guirro Zuliani, Leandro Ribeiro Alves, Fabio Somera Junior, Andressa Rastrelo Rezende, Jussara Almeida de Oliveira Baggio, Rodrigo Bazan, Marcos Massao Shimano, Luciane Aparecida Pascucci Sande de Souza, Gustavo José Luvizutto","doi":"10.1177/00315125251346867","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This cross-sectional study aimed to examine the participants' ability to perceive trunk positions by comparing the trunk position sense (TPS) and subjective vertical test results. The effect of age on the perception of trunk position was also evaluated. Verticality perception was measured in the sitting position using the subjective vertical visual (SVV) bucket test and the subjective vertical postural (SVP) test with an automatic chair in the frontal plane. The repositioning accuracy of the trunk joint perception was measured using the TPS and assessed using a 3D-printed laser point support fixed to the xiphoid process during 30° of trunk lateral flexion in sitting and standing positions. Subsequently, the absolute angular deviation was calculated. The TPS data of the groups were compared using the Mann-Whitney U test. The Bland-Altman test was used to calculate the agreement between the evaluation methods. In addition, the sensitivity and specificity of the TPS<sub>sitting</sub>, TPS<sub>standing</sub>, and verticality tests were compared using a receiver operating characteristic curve. A total of 26 young and 26 older adults were included in this study. Older adults had a greater absolute angular deviation in the TPS<sub>standing</sub> in the counterclockwise and total directions than the young adults. Agreement was greater between TPS<sub>sitting</sub> and TPS<sub>standing</sub> with SVV in young and older adults and between TPS<sub>standing</sub> and SVP in older adults. TPS<sub>standing</sub> has a greater sensitivity for clinical application in older adults. Therefore, the TPS is a viable instrument for assessing active trunk proprioception in young and older adults and has greater agreement with verticality tests.</p>","PeriodicalId":19869,"journal":{"name":"Perceptual and Motor Skills","volume":" ","pages":"315125251346867"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Perceptual and Motor Skills","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00315125251346867","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This cross-sectional study aimed to examine the participants' ability to perceive trunk positions by comparing the trunk position sense (TPS) and subjective vertical test results. The effect of age on the perception of trunk position was also evaluated. Verticality perception was measured in the sitting position using the subjective vertical visual (SVV) bucket test and the subjective vertical postural (SVP) test with an automatic chair in the frontal plane. The repositioning accuracy of the trunk joint perception was measured using the TPS and assessed using a 3D-printed laser point support fixed to the xiphoid process during 30° of trunk lateral flexion in sitting and standing positions. Subsequently, the absolute angular deviation was calculated. The TPS data of the groups were compared using the Mann-Whitney U test. The Bland-Altman test was used to calculate the agreement between the evaluation methods. In addition, the sensitivity and specificity of the TPSsitting, TPSstanding, and verticality tests were compared using a receiver operating characteristic curve. A total of 26 young and 26 older adults were included in this study. Older adults had a greater absolute angular deviation in the TPSstanding in the counterclockwise and total directions than the young adults. Agreement was greater between TPSsitting and TPSstanding with SVV in young and older adults and between TPSstanding and SVP in older adults. TPSstanding has a greater sensitivity for clinical application in older adults. Therefore, the TPS is a viable instrument for assessing active trunk proprioception in young and older adults and has greater agreement with verticality tests.

一种用于躯干位置感评估的激光装置的研制:标准数据和健康个体垂直感测试的并发验证。
本横断面研究旨在通过比较躯干位置感(TPS)和主观垂直测试结果来检验被试感知躯干位置的能力。年龄对躯干位置知觉的影响也进行了评价。采用主观垂直视觉(SVV)桶测试和主观垂直体位(SVP)测试测量坐姿的垂直感知。使用TPS测量躯干关节感知的重新定位精度,并使用固定在剑突上的3d打印激光点支架在坐姿和站立位置的躯干侧屈30°时进行评估。然后,计算绝对角偏差。各组TPS数据比较采用Mann-Whitney U检验。采用Bland-Altman检验计算评价方法之间的一致性。此外,采用受试者工作特征曲线比较tps坐姿、tps站立和垂直度试验的敏感性和特异性。共有26名年轻人和26名老年人参与了这项研究。老年人的tps站立在逆时针方向和总方向上的绝对角度偏差大于青年人。在年轻人和老年人中,TPSsitting和TPSstanding与SVV之间的一致性更大,在老年人中,TPSstanding和SVP之间的一致性更大。tps站立在老年人临床应用中具有更高的敏感性。因此,TPS是评估年轻人和老年人活跃躯干本体感觉的可行工具,并且与垂直度测试更一致。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Perceptual and Motor Skills
Perceptual and Motor Skills PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL-
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
6.20%
发文量
110
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信