Patients' Attitudes Toward Hallucinogenic and Non-Hallucinogenic Psilocybin for Mental Health Treatment.

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL
Araam Abboud, Clay Schiebrel, Ramzi W Nahhas, Sam Durkin, Kyle Hua, Hannah Redding, Danielle Gainer
{"title":"Patients' Attitudes Toward Hallucinogenic and Non-Hallucinogenic Psilocybin for Mental Health Treatment.","authors":"Araam Abboud, Clay Schiebrel, Ramzi W Nahhas, Sam Durkin, Kyle Hua, Hannah Redding, Danielle Gainer","doi":"10.1080/02791072.2025.2511752","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study examined patient perspectives on psilocybin therapy, specifically their acceptance and views on the therapeutic benefits of both hallucinogenic and non-hallucinogenic forms. A cross-sectional survey was conducted among psychiatric patients aged 18-65 at a community mental health center, assessing their attitudes, knowledge, and acceptance of psilocybin therapy. In total, 62.4% of the participants expressed openness to hallucinogenic psilocybin (<i>p</i> = .009), while 60.4% were open to non-hallucinogenic forms (<i>p</i> = .023). Patients with major depressive disorder preferred hallucinogenic therapy more (<i>p</i> = .010), while those with borderline personality disorder (BPD) (<i>p</i> = .030) and post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) (<i>p</i> = .035) favored non-hallucinogenic options, possibly due to concerns about the intensity of hallucinogenic experiences. Individuals with substance use disorder (SUD) demonstrated a greater acceptance of both hallucinogenic (<i>p</i> = .007) and non-hallucinogenic forms (<i>p</i> = .046) than individuals without SUD. These findings suggest that societal stigma is not a significant barrier to psilocybin therapy and that non-hallucinogenic forms may provide a more accessible option for certain patient groups. Understanding patient perspectives on psilocybin therapy, including vulnerability to adverse hallucinogenic experiences, can inform personalized and effective treatments for resistant conditions.</p>","PeriodicalId":16902,"journal":{"name":"Journal of psychoactive drugs","volume":" ","pages":"1-8"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of psychoactive drugs","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/02791072.2025.2511752","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study examined patient perspectives on psilocybin therapy, specifically their acceptance and views on the therapeutic benefits of both hallucinogenic and non-hallucinogenic forms. A cross-sectional survey was conducted among psychiatric patients aged 18-65 at a community mental health center, assessing their attitudes, knowledge, and acceptance of psilocybin therapy. In total, 62.4% of the participants expressed openness to hallucinogenic psilocybin (p = .009), while 60.4% were open to non-hallucinogenic forms (p = .023). Patients with major depressive disorder preferred hallucinogenic therapy more (p = .010), while those with borderline personality disorder (BPD) (p = .030) and post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) (p = .035) favored non-hallucinogenic options, possibly due to concerns about the intensity of hallucinogenic experiences. Individuals with substance use disorder (SUD) demonstrated a greater acceptance of both hallucinogenic (p = .007) and non-hallucinogenic forms (p = .046) than individuals without SUD. These findings suggest that societal stigma is not a significant barrier to psilocybin therapy and that non-hallucinogenic forms may provide a more accessible option for certain patient groups. Understanding patient perspectives on psilocybin therapy, including vulnerability to adverse hallucinogenic experiences, can inform personalized and effective treatments for resistant conditions.

致幻与非致幻裸盖菇素在心理健康治疗中的态度。
本研究调查了患者对裸盖菇素治疗的看法,特别是他们对致幻和非致幻形式的治疗益处的接受程度和看法。对某社区精神卫生中心18-65岁的精神病患者进行了横断面调查,评估他们对裸盖菇素治疗的态度、知识和接受程度。总的来说,62.4%的参与者表示对致幻裸盖菇素持开放态度(p = 0.009),而60.4%的参与者对非致幻形式持开放态度(p = 0.023)。重度抑郁症患者更倾向于致幻治疗(p = 0.010),而边缘型人格障碍(BPD)患者(p = 0.030)和创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)患者(p = 0.035)更倾向于非致幻治疗,可能是由于担心致幻体验的强度。与没有物质使用障碍的个体相比,有物质使用障碍(SUD)的个体对致幻剂(p = .007)和非致幻剂形式(p = .046)的接受度更高。这些发现表明,社会耻辱并不是裸盖菇素治疗的重大障碍,非致幻剂形式可能为某些患者群体提供了更容易获得的选择。了解患者对裸盖菇素治疗的看法,包括对不良致幻经历的脆弱性,可以为耐药性疾病的个性化和有效治疗提供信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
7.10%
发文量
62
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信