{"title":"Getting lost in new contexts: Weak generalization in artificial orthography learning among groups with literacy deficits","authors":"M. Wójcik, H. Górecka, A. Szukało, A. Dębska","doi":"10.1016/j.learninstruc.2025.102154","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>It remains unclear whether poor reading and spelling abilities might be explained by common difficulties in linguistic generalization skills, i.e. transferring acquired grapheme-phoneme knowledge into the novel contexts.</div></div><div><h3>Aims</h3><div>This study aimed to examine the hierarchical process of artificial orthography learning, focusing on the progression from lower-to higher-level linguistic abilities in children with differing levels of literacy skills.</div></div><div><h3>Sample</h3><div>Three groups of school-aged children (M<sub>age</sub> = 11.02; n = 82): with developmental dyslexia (DYS, n = 27), with isolated spelling deficit (n = 28) and typical readers and spellers (control group; CON, n = 27).</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Artificial orthography learning task with 4 subtasks: Association, New Pseudowords, Position Rule and Neighbourhood Rule. After the learning phase, participants took a Test and performed a Production task validating acquisition of connections between symbols and speech sounds.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Performance in generalization requiring new pseudowords identification was hindered in children with decreased literacy skills. Pace of learning measured by the number of task repetitions as well as the speed of execution was similar between groups.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Difficulties in the linguistic generalization skills are a shared component of literacy deficits, including dyslexia and an isolated spelling deficit.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48357,"journal":{"name":"Learning and Instruction","volume":"99 ","pages":"Article 102154"},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Learning and Instruction","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0959475225000787","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background
It remains unclear whether poor reading and spelling abilities might be explained by common difficulties in linguistic generalization skills, i.e. transferring acquired grapheme-phoneme knowledge into the novel contexts.
Aims
This study aimed to examine the hierarchical process of artificial orthography learning, focusing on the progression from lower-to higher-level linguistic abilities in children with differing levels of literacy skills.
Sample
Three groups of school-aged children (Mage = 11.02; n = 82): with developmental dyslexia (DYS, n = 27), with isolated spelling deficit (n = 28) and typical readers and spellers (control group; CON, n = 27).
Methods
Artificial orthography learning task with 4 subtasks: Association, New Pseudowords, Position Rule and Neighbourhood Rule. After the learning phase, participants took a Test and performed a Production task validating acquisition of connections between symbols and speech sounds.
Results
Performance in generalization requiring new pseudowords identification was hindered in children with decreased literacy skills. Pace of learning measured by the number of task repetitions as well as the speed of execution was similar between groups.
Conclusions
Difficulties in the linguistic generalization skills are a shared component of literacy deficits, including dyslexia and an isolated spelling deficit.
期刊介绍:
As an international, multi-disciplinary, peer-refereed journal, Learning and Instruction provides a platform for the publication of the most advanced scientific research in the areas of learning, development, instruction and teaching. The journal welcomes original empirical investigations. The papers may represent a variety of theoretical perspectives and different methodological approaches. They may refer to any age level, from infants to adults and to a diversity of learning and instructional settings, from laboratory experiments to field studies. The major criteria in the review and the selection process concern the significance of the contribution to the area of learning and instruction, and the rigor of the study.