Nutritional quality of university dining options varies by location, level of convenience, and accessibility: Pilot study perspectives on assessing university food environments

IF 4.8 Q1 AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Catherine J. Andersen , Kristina Murray , Alexander Gaito , Lydia Dupree , Layra Cintrón-Rivera
{"title":"Nutritional quality of university dining options varies by location, level of convenience, and accessibility: Pilot study perspectives on assessing university food environments","authors":"Catherine J. Andersen ,&nbsp;Kristina Murray ,&nbsp;Alexander Gaito ,&nbsp;Lydia Dupree ,&nbsp;Layra Cintrón-Rivera","doi":"10.1016/j.jafr.2025.102057","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>College students often fail to meet national guidelines for dietary intake, which in part has been associated with university food environments, where students’ dietary choices may be limited by the nutritional quality of campus food choices, in addition to proximity, hours of operation, and accessibility of dining venues given student course and extracurricular schedules. However, studies that evaluate the comprehensive university food environment, as opposed to focusing specific food options (e.g., dining halls), is limited. Therefore, we investigated whether the nutritional quality of food options varied across different locations and dining venues at a university campus in the northeastern region of the United States in a pilot study, with a focus on nutrients required to be reported by dining venues, and those of interest outlined in the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) Dietary Guidelines for Americans 2025–2025. Nutrient composition of dietary offerings was collected from locations and venues across campus over the course of one year: 1) the main campus dining hall, and convenience dining options: 2) themed grab-and-go meal stations in a food court, 3) a commercial coffee and bagel shop, and 4) vending machines located in academic buildings and dormitories across campus. We observed that the commercial coffee &amp; bagel shop menu included items with the highest amount of energy, carbohydrates, sugar, total and saturated fat, protein, and sodium on average compared to other dining options. Conversely, the dining hall, which provided the greatest variety of foods and a sit-down meal environment, provided options with the lowest energy, carbohydrates, sugar, total and saturated fat on average, and the highest amount of fiber and high-fiber food options. Vending machine items contained the lowest amount of sodium on average, whereas food court menus offered the highest and lowest proportion of low-fiber and low-sodium foods, respectively. Analysis within individual dining categories showed that the average nutrient composition of dining hall options varied across mealtimes, whereas the nutrient composition of dining hall options did not vary across days of the week. Within the food court, we observed differences in the average content of energy, total and saturated fat, protein, sugar, fiber, and sodium menu items, as well as availability of high vs. low sodium and saturated fat menu items, across the five themed meals stations (American Grill, Deli, Italian, Salad Bar, and Sushi, Deli). Finally, while the items being offered in vending machines varied, we did not observe statistical differences in average nutrient content of food items in vending machines individually or across academic buildings or dormitories for first-year, second-year, or upperclassmen students. Our pilot study findings suggest that the nutritional quality of food offerings significantly varies across university campus venues and locations, and that the healthfulness of convenience foods is location-specific.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":34393,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Agriculture and Food Research","volume":"22 ","pages":"Article 102057"},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Agriculture and Food Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666154325004284","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

College students often fail to meet national guidelines for dietary intake, which in part has been associated with university food environments, where students’ dietary choices may be limited by the nutritional quality of campus food choices, in addition to proximity, hours of operation, and accessibility of dining venues given student course and extracurricular schedules. However, studies that evaluate the comprehensive university food environment, as opposed to focusing specific food options (e.g., dining halls), is limited. Therefore, we investigated whether the nutritional quality of food options varied across different locations and dining venues at a university campus in the northeastern region of the United States in a pilot study, with a focus on nutrients required to be reported by dining venues, and those of interest outlined in the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) Dietary Guidelines for Americans 2025–2025. Nutrient composition of dietary offerings was collected from locations and venues across campus over the course of one year: 1) the main campus dining hall, and convenience dining options: 2) themed grab-and-go meal stations in a food court, 3) a commercial coffee and bagel shop, and 4) vending machines located in academic buildings and dormitories across campus. We observed that the commercial coffee & bagel shop menu included items with the highest amount of energy, carbohydrates, sugar, total and saturated fat, protein, and sodium on average compared to other dining options. Conversely, the dining hall, which provided the greatest variety of foods and a sit-down meal environment, provided options with the lowest energy, carbohydrates, sugar, total and saturated fat on average, and the highest amount of fiber and high-fiber food options. Vending machine items contained the lowest amount of sodium on average, whereas food court menus offered the highest and lowest proportion of low-fiber and low-sodium foods, respectively. Analysis within individual dining categories showed that the average nutrient composition of dining hall options varied across mealtimes, whereas the nutrient composition of dining hall options did not vary across days of the week. Within the food court, we observed differences in the average content of energy, total and saturated fat, protein, sugar, fiber, and sodium menu items, as well as availability of high vs. low sodium and saturated fat menu items, across the five themed meals stations (American Grill, Deli, Italian, Salad Bar, and Sushi, Deli). Finally, while the items being offered in vending machines varied, we did not observe statistical differences in average nutrient content of food items in vending machines individually or across academic buildings or dormitories for first-year, second-year, or upperclassmen students. Our pilot study findings suggest that the nutritional quality of food offerings significantly varies across university campus venues and locations, and that the healthfulness of convenience foods is location-specific.
大学餐饮选择的营养质量因地点、便利程度和可达性而异:评估大学餐饮环境的试点研究视角
大学生经常不能达到国家规定的饮食摄入标准,这在一定程度上与大学的饮食环境有关,学生的饮食选择可能受到校园食物选择的营养质量、距离、营业时间以及餐饮场所的可及性等因素的限制,这些因素都取决于学生的课程和课外安排。然而,评估综合大学饮食环境的研究是有限的,而不是专注于特定的食物选择(例如,食堂)。因此,我们在一项试点研究中调查了美国东北部地区一所大学校园内不同地点和餐饮场所的食物营养质量是否存在差异,重点关注餐饮场所需要报告的营养成分,以及美国农业部(USDA)《2025-2025年美国人膳食指南》中概述的营养成分。在一年的时间里,我们从校园内的各个地点和场所收集了膳食产品的营养成分:1)主校园食堂和方便餐饮选择;2)美食广场的主题外卖餐点;3)商业咖啡和百吉饼店;4)位于校园内教学楼和宿舍的自动售货机。我们观察到商业咖啡与其他餐饮选择相比,百吉饼店菜单上的食物平均含有最多的能量、碳水化合物、糖、总脂肪和饱和脂肪、蛋白质和钠。相反,食堂提供的食物种类最多,有一个坐下来吃饭的环境,提供的食物中能量、碳水化合物、糖、总脂肪和饱和脂肪的平均含量最低,纤维和高纤维食物的含量最高。自动贩卖机上的商品平均含钠量最低,而美食广场菜单上的低纤维和低钠食物的比例分别最高和最低。对单个餐饮类别的分析表明,在不同的用餐时间,食堂选择的平均营养成分有所不同,而在一周的不同日子里,食堂选择的营养成分没有变化。在美食广场内,我们观察了五个主题餐点(美式烧烤、熟食、意大利、沙拉吧和寿司、熟食)的能量、总脂肪和饱和脂肪、蛋白质、糖、纤维和钠的平均含量的差异,以及高钠和低饱和脂肪菜单的可用性。最后,虽然自动贩卖机提供的商品各不相同,但我们没有观察到自动贩卖机中单个食品的平均营养含量,也没有观察到一年级、二年级或高年级学生在教学楼或宿舍中食品的平均营养含量有统计学差异。我们的初步研究结果表明,食品的营养质量在不同的大学校园场所和地点有很大的不同,方便食品的健康程度是特定于地点的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
2.60%
发文量
193
审稿时长
69 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信