On the impact of urban climate and heat islands on building energy performance: A critical review

IF 6.6 2区 工程技术 Q1 CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY
Farzad Hashemi , Gerald Mills
{"title":"On the impact of urban climate and heat islands on building energy performance: A critical review","authors":"Farzad Hashemi ,&nbsp;Gerald Mills","doi":"10.1016/j.enbuild.2025.115946","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Urban Heat Islands (UHIs) substantially alter local climates, yet their impacts on building energy performance remain inconsistently quantified and poorly integrated into simulation workflows, energy codes, and planning practice. This review critically synthesizes U.S.-based studies that model the impacts of the UHI effect on building heating and cooling loads, revealing substantial variability in the reported energy impacts. Depending on climate conditions and building type, studies report cooling load increases ranging from 4% to 65% and heating load reductions from 3% to over 100%. These wide ranges stem largely from methodological inconsistencies, including divergent UHI quantification techniques, mismatched spatial scales between climate and energy models, and inconsistent integration strategies. The review highlights key gaps, including the widespread use of oversimplified rural baseline weather files, the exclusion of non-thermal microclimatic variables such as wind and humidity, over-reliance on the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) prototype buildings, and limited representation of colder and warm-dry climate zones. Moreover, results are often difficult to compare due to inconsistent reporting metrics and a lack of reproducibility. Addressing these gaps requires standardized UHI-adjusted weather data, expanded research across all climate zones, and greater consideration of non-code-compliant buildings and socioeconomic disparities. The research advocates the need to address these issues by integrating UHI effects into Building Energy Modeling (BEM) workflows, energy codes (e.g., ASHRAE, IECC), and urban climate policies to enhance predictive accuracy and inform climate-resilient design and planning strategies.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11641,"journal":{"name":"Energy and Buildings","volume":"343 ","pages":"Article 115946"},"PeriodicalIF":6.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy and Buildings","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378778825006760","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Urban Heat Islands (UHIs) substantially alter local climates, yet their impacts on building energy performance remain inconsistently quantified and poorly integrated into simulation workflows, energy codes, and planning practice. This review critically synthesizes U.S.-based studies that model the impacts of the UHI effect on building heating and cooling loads, revealing substantial variability in the reported energy impacts. Depending on climate conditions and building type, studies report cooling load increases ranging from 4% to 65% and heating load reductions from 3% to over 100%. These wide ranges stem largely from methodological inconsistencies, including divergent UHI quantification techniques, mismatched spatial scales between climate and energy models, and inconsistent integration strategies. The review highlights key gaps, including the widespread use of oversimplified rural baseline weather files, the exclusion of non-thermal microclimatic variables such as wind and humidity, over-reliance on the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) prototype buildings, and limited representation of colder and warm-dry climate zones. Moreover, results are often difficult to compare due to inconsistent reporting metrics and a lack of reproducibility. Addressing these gaps requires standardized UHI-adjusted weather data, expanded research across all climate zones, and greater consideration of non-code-compliant buildings and socioeconomic disparities. The research advocates the need to address these issues by integrating UHI effects into Building Energy Modeling (BEM) workflows, energy codes (e.g., ASHRAE, IECC), and urban climate policies to enhance predictive accuracy and inform climate-resilient design and planning strategies.
城市气候和热岛对建筑能源性能的影响:综述
城市热岛(UHIs)在很大程度上改变了当地气候,但其对建筑能源性能的影响仍然不一致,并且很难整合到模拟工作流程、能源规范和规划实践中。这篇综述批判性地综合了基于美国的研究,这些研究模拟了热岛热岛对建筑供暖和制冷负荷的影响,揭示了报告的能源影响的实质性变化。根据气候条件和建筑类型的不同,研究报告称冷负荷增加了4%到65%,热负荷减少了3%到100%以上。这些差异很大程度上源于方法论上的不一致,包括不同的热岛指数量化技术、气候和能源模式之间不匹配的空间尺度以及不一致的整合策略。该评估强调了主要的差距,包括广泛使用过于简化的农村基线天气文件,排除了非热微气候变量,如风和湿度,过度依赖美国能源部(DOE)的原型建筑,以及对寒冷和温暖干燥气候区域的有限代表。此外,由于不一致的报告标准和缺乏可重复性,结果往往难以比较。解决这些差距需要标准化的uhi调整天气数据,扩大对所有气候带的研究,并更多地考虑不符合规范的建筑和社会经济差异。该研究主张通过将热岛效应整合到建筑能源建模(BEM)工作流程、能源规范(如ASHRAE、IECC)和城市气候政策中来解决这些问题,以提高预测准确性,并为气候适应性设计和规划策略提供信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Energy and Buildings
Energy and Buildings 工程技术-工程:土木
CiteScore
12.70
自引率
11.90%
发文量
863
审稿时长
38 days
期刊介绍: An international journal devoted to investigations of energy use and efficiency in buildings Energy and Buildings is an international journal publishing articles with explicit links to energy use in buildings. The aim is to present new research results, and new proven practice aimed at reducing the energy needs of a building and improving indoor environment quality.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信