Re-examining the ability, benevolence, and integrity (ABI) model of trust: Do business professors really need all three?

IF 6 2区 管理学 Q1 BUSINESS
Jenna-Lyn R. Roman, Juanne Greene, James A. Swaim, Graham H. Lowman, Michael J. Maloni
{"title":"Re-examining the ability, benevolence, and integrity (ABI) model of trust: Do business professors really need all three?","authors":"Jenna-Lyn R. Roman,&nbsp;Juanne Greene,&nbsp;James A. Swaim,&nbsp;Graham H. Lowman,&nbsp;Michael J. Maloni","doi":"10.1016/j.ijme.2025.101207","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Students’ trust in their professors is a critical success factor for student satisfaction and retention, and ultimately professor performance. The seminal ABI model of trust maintains that all three dimensions of ability (A), benevolence (B), and integrity (I) are necessary to establish trust. In contrast to this one-size-fits-all perspective, our qualitative comparative analysis (QCA) on undergraduate and graduate business student survey data finds that professors generally do not always need all three ABI dimensions. For instance, benevolence or a combination of ability and integrity can suffice for most students. Moreover, configurations for higher trust differ from those leading to lower levels of trust. Complementing these results, an ensuing qualitative study reveals that the specific dimensions of ABI that students perceive as important for building trust differ from professor perceptions. Specifically, students prioritize relational indicators as opposed to task indicators, which are favored by professors. Additionally, personal attributes emerged as a fourth dimension, suggesting the ABI model of trust may be incomplete for trust in professors. In combination, these results challenge a key underlying assumption of the ABI model and provide novel and practical insight into how to train new professors and re-train established professors to foster trust with students.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":47191,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Management Education","volume":"23 3","pages":"Article 101207"},"PeriodicalIF":6.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Management Education","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1472811725000771","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Students’ trust in their professors is a critical success factor for student satisfaction and retention, and ultimately professor performance. The seminal ABI model of trust maintains that all three dimensions of ability (A), benevolence (B), and integrity (I) are necessary to establish trust. In contrast to this one-size-fits-all perspective, our qualitative comparative analysis (QCA) on undergraduate and graduate business student survey data finds that professors generally do not always need all three ABI dimensions. For instance, benevolence or a combination of ability and integrity can suffice for most students. Moreover, configurations for higher trust differ from those leading to lower levels of trust. Complementing these results, an ensuing qualitative study reveals that the specific dimensions of ABI that students perceive as important for building trust differ from professor perceptions. Specifically, students prioritize relational indicators as opposed to task indicators, which are favored by professors. Additionally, personal attributes emerged as a fourth dimension, suggesting the ABI model of trust may be incomplete for trust in professors. In combination, these results challenge a key underlying assumption of the ABI model and provide novel and practical insight into how to train new professors and re-train established professors to foster trust with students.
重新审视信任的能力、仁爱和诚信(ABI)模式:商科教授真的需要这三者吗?
学生对教授的信任是学生满意度和留校率的关键成功因素,最终影响到教授的表现。开创性的ABI信任模型认为,能力(A)、仁慈(B)和诚信(I)这三个维度都是建立信任所必需的。与这种一刀切的观点相反,我们对商科本科生和研究生调查数据的定性比较分析(QCA)发现,教授通常并不总是需要所有三个ABI维度。例如,对大多数学生来说,仁慈或能力与诚信的结合就足够了。此外,高信任的配置不同于导致低信任的配置。补充这些结果,随后的定性研究揭示了学生认为对建立信任很重要的ABI的具体维度与教授的看法不同。具体来说,学生优先考虑关系指标,而不是教授青睐的任务指标。此外,个人属性作为第四个维度出现,表明ABI信任模型对于教授的信任可能是不完整的。综上所述,这些结果挑战了ABI模型的一个关键基本假设,并为如何培训新教授和重新培训已有教授以培养与学生的信任提供了新颖而实用的见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
10.30
自引率
25.00%
发文量
136
审稿时长
64 days
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Management Education provides a forum for scholarly reporting and discussion of developments in all aspects of teaching and learning in business and management. The Journal seeks reflective papers which bring together pedagogy and theories of management learning; descriptions of innovative teaching which include critical reflection on implementation and outcomes will also be considered.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信