Conventional Antimicrobial and Medicinal Plants from a Traditional Medicine Market in South Africa: An Interactive Antimicrobial and Toxicity Study.

IF 4.3 2区 医学 Q1 INFECTIOUS DISEASES
Zelna Booth, Sabiha Essack, Sandy van Vuuren
{"title":"Conventional Antimicrobial and Medicinal Plants from a Traditional Medicine Market in South Africa: An Interactive Antimicrobial and Toxicity Study.","authors":"Zelna Booth, Sabiha Essack, Sandy van Vuuren","doi":"10.3390/antibiotics14050512","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The World Health Organization (WHO) has proposed the use of integrative medicine to achieve extended healthcare coverage in developing countries facing high morbidity. Traditional remedies are frequently employed to prevent and treat infections among South Africans; however, the ways in which they interact with conventional antimicrobials are largely unknown. Therefore, this study aimed to explore the interactions between commonly traded medicinal plants at a traditional medicine market in KwaZulu-Natal (KZN), South Africa, and conventional antibiotics and antifungals.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>To determine the interactive antimicrobial profiles for plant/conventional antimicrobial combinations, minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) assays were performed against ESKAPE pathogens and the yeasts <i>Candida albicans</i> and <i>Candida glabrata</i>. Calculated fractional inhibitory concentration (ΣFIC) values were used to identify synergism or antagonism, with synergistic interactions further tested in vitro for toxicity.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 952 combinations were tested, of which 5.8% and 54.6% of the plant/antibiotic combinations were synergistic and antagonistic, respectively; additionally, 1.7% and 58.6% of the plant/antifungal combinations showed synergism or antagonism, respectively. The most toxic plant/antibiotic combination was <i>Artemisia afra</i> with doxycycline (71.1% mortality). The most toxic plant/antifungal combination was <i>Acorus calamus</i> with fluconazole (78.8% mortality).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>When medicinal plants acquired from a traditional medicine market in South Africa are used in combination with conventional antibiotics and antifungals, more than half of the combinations exhibit antagonism, which is concerning.</p>","PeriodicalId":54246,"journal":{"name":"Antibiotics-Basel","volume":"14 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12108390/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Antibiotics-Basel","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics14050512","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The World Health Organization (WHO) has proposed the use of integrative medicine to achieve extended healthcare coverage in developing countries facing high morbidity. Traditional remedies are frequently employed to prevent and treat infections among South Africans; however, the ways in which they interact with conventional antimicrobials are largely unknown. Therefore, this study aimed to explore the interactions between commonly traded medicinal plants at a traditional medicine market in KwaZulu-Natal (KZN), South Africa, and conventional antibiotics and antifungals.

Methods: To determine the interactive antimicrobial profiles for plant/conventional antimicrobial combinations, minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) assays were performed against ESKAPE pathogens and the yeasts Candida albicans and Candida glabrata. Calculated fractional inhibitory concentration (ΣFIC) values were used to identify synergism or antagonism, with synergistic interactions further tested in vitro for toxicity.

Results: A total of 952 combinations were tested, of which 5.8% and 54.6% of the plant/antibiotic combinations were synergistic and antagonistic, respectively; additionally, 1.7% and 58.6% of the plant/antifungal combinations showed synergism or antagonism, respectively. The most toxic plant/antibiotic combination was Artemisia afra with doxycycline (71.1% mortality). The most toxic plant/antifungal combination was Acorus calamus with fluconazole (78.8% mortality).

Conclusions: When medicinal plants acquired from a traditional medicine market in South Africa are used in combination with conventional antibiotics and antifungals, more than half of the combinations exhibit antagonism, which is concerning.

来自南非传统医药市场的常规抗菌和药用植物:一项相互作用的抗菌和毒性研究。
背景:世界卫生组织(世卫组织)建议在面临高发病率的发展中国家使用综合医学来扩大医疗保健覆盖范围。南非人经常采用传统疗法来预防和治疗感染;然而,它们与传统抗菌剂相互作用的方式在很大程度上是未知的。因此,本研究旨在探讨南非夸祖鲁-纳塔尔省(KZN)传统医药市场上常见的药用植物与传统抗生素和抗真菌药物之间的相互作用。方法:采用最小抑菌浓度(MIC)法对ESKAPE病原菌、白色念珠菌和面露念珠菌进行抑菌试验,以确定植物/常规抗菌组合的相互作用。计算的分数抑制浓度(ΣFIC)值用于确定协同作用或拮抗作用,并进一步在体外测试协同相互作用的毒性。结果:共检测952个组合,其中植物/抗生素组合为增效和拮抗的比例分别为5.8%和54.6%;此外,1.7%和58.6%的植物/抗真菌组合分别表现出增效或拮抗作用。毒性最大的植物/抗生素组合是阿菲蒿加强力霉素(71.1%)。以菖蒲加氟康唑毒性最大(78.8%)。结论:从南非某传统医药市场获得的药用植物与常规抗生素和抗真菌药物联合使用时,半数以上的组合表现出拮抗作用,令人担忧。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Antibiotics-Basel
Antibiotics-Basel Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics-General Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics
CiteScore
7.30
自引率
14.60%
发文量
1547
审稿时长
11 weeks
期刊介绍: Antibiotics (ISSN 2079-6382) is an open access, peer reviewed journal on all aspects of antibiotics. Antibiotics is a multi-disciplinary journal encompassing the general fields of biochemistry, chemistry, genetics, microbiology and pharmacology. Our aim is to encourage scientists to publish their experimental and theoretical results in as much detail as possible. Therefore, there is no restriction on the length of papers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信