Heterogeneity of Biofilm Formation Among Staphylococcus aureus and Coagulase-Negative Staphylococcus Species in Clinically Relevant Intravenous Fat Emulsions.

IF 4.3 2区 医学 Q1 INFECTIOUS DISEASES
Gustavo R Alvira-Arill, Oscar R Herrera, Jeremy S Stultz, Brian M Peters
{"title":"Heterogeneity of Biofilm Formation Among <i>Staphylococcus aureus</i> and Coagulase-Negative <i>Staphylococcus</i> Species in Clinically Relevant Intravenous Fat Emulsions.","authors":"Gustavo R Alvira-Arill, Oscar R Herrera, Jeremy S Stultz, Brian M Peters","doi":"10.3390/antibiotics14050484","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background</b>: Compared to soybean oil intravenous fat emulsion (SO-IFE), use of mixed-oil IFE (MO-IFE) is associated with reduced rates of catheter-related bloodstream infections caused by coagulase-negative <i>Staphylococcus</i> species (CoNS) in pediatric patients receiving parenteral nutrition. <b>Methods</b>: Using an in vitro biofilm model, this study aimed to assess the impact of IFEs on biofilm formation among <i>Staphylococcus</i> species. <i>S. aureus</i>, <i>S. capitis</i>, <i>S. epidermidis</i>, <i>S. haemolyticus</i>, <i>S. hominis</i>, and <i>S. lugdunensis</i> were cultivated as biofilms in media supplemented with SO-IFE, MO-IFE, or fish oil IFE (IFE). Biomass was quantified by the crystal violet method, and follow-up planktonic growth assays assessed antimicrobial effects of IFEs. <b>Results</b>: Compared to SO-IFE, MO-IFE and FO-IFE significantly inhibited biofilm formation of <i>S. aureus</i> but did not impact planktonic growth. Contrary to clinical data, CoNS biofilm formation was not impacted by any of the IFEs tested. <i>S. aureus</i> biofilm inhibition in IFEs was further investigated by comparing differences following growth in SO-IFE supplemented with capric acid, docosahexaenoic acid (DHA), or eicosapenaenoic acid (EPA) to concentrations matching those of MO-IFE. Capric acid supplementation was associated with significant reduction in biofilm formation compared to SO-IFE alone. However, this was attributed to a bactericidal effect based on follow-up planktonic growth assays. <b>Conclusions</b>: These results suggest that biofilm formation in <i>S. aureus</i> is variably impacted by fatty acid composition in clinically relevant IFEs, with capric acid exhibiting bactericidal activity against tested isolates.</p>","PeriodicalId":54246,"journal":{"name":"Antibiotics-Basel","volume":"14 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12108170/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Antibiotics-Basel","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics14050484","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Compared to soybean oil intravenous fat emulsion (SO-IFE), use of mixed-oil IFE (MO-IFE) is associated with reduced rates of catheter-related bloodstream infections caused by coagulase-negative Staphylococcus species (CoNS) in pediatric patients receiving parenteral nutrition. Methods: Using an in vitro biofilm model, this study aimed to assess the impact of IFEs on biofilm formation among Staphylococcus species. S. aureus, S. capitis, S. epidermidis, S. haemolyticus, S. hominis, and S. lugdunensis were cultivated as biofilms in media supplemented with SO-IFE, MO-IFE, or fish oil IFE (IFE). Biomass was quantified by the crystal violet method, and follow-up planktonic growth assays assessed antimicrobial effects of IFEs. Results: Compared to SO-IFE, MO-IFE and FO-IFE significantly inhibited biofilm formation of S. aureus but did not impact planktonic growth. Contrary to clinical data, CoNS biofilm formation was not impacted by any of the IFEs tested. S. aureus biofilm inhibition in IFEs was further investigated by comparing differences following growth in SO-IFE supplemented with capric acid, docosahexaenoic acid (DHA), or eicosapenaenoic acid (EPA) to concentrations matching those of MO-IFE. Capric acid supplementation was associated with significant reduction in biofilm formation compared to SO-IFE alone. However, this was attributed to a bactericidal effect based on follow-up planktonic growth assays. Conclusions: These results suggest that biofilm formation in S. aureus is variably impacted by fatty acid composition in clinically relevant IFEs, with capric acid exhibiting bactericidal activity against tested isolates.

临床相关静脉注射脂肪乳中金黄色葡萄球菌和凝固酶阴性葡萄球菌生物膜形成的异质性
背景:与大豆油静脉脂肪乳(SO-IFE)相比,在接受肠外营养的儿科患者中,使用混合油静脉脂肪乳(MO-IFE)可降低由凝固酶阴性葡萄球菌(con)引起的导管相关血流感染的发生率。方法:采用体外生物膜模型,研究IFEs对葡萄球菌生物膜形成的影响。金黄色葡萄球菌、头孢葡萄球菌、表皮葡萄球菌、溶血葡萄球菌、人型葡萄球菌和卢顿葡萄球菌作为生物膜在添加了SO-IFE、MO-IFE或鱼油IFE (IFE)的培养基中培养。采用结晶紫法定量生物量,随后进行浮游生物生长试验,评估其抗菌效果。结果:与SO-IFE相比,MO-IFE和FO-IFE显著抑制金黄色葡萄球菌生物膜的形成,但不影响浮游生物的生长。与临床数据相反,con生物膜的形成不受任何ife测试的影响。通过比较添加了己酸、二十二碳六烯酸(DHA)或二十碳六烯酸(EPA)的SO-IFE与与MO-IFE相同浓度的SO-IFE的生长差异,进一步研究了对金黄色葡萄球菌生物膜的抑制作用。与单独使用SO-IFE相比,补充癸酸与生物膜形成的显著减少有关。然而,这归因于基于后续浮游生物生长分析的杀菌效果。结论:这些结果表明,在临床相关的IFEs中,脂肪酸组成对金黄色葡萄球菌的生物膜形成有不同的影响,其中癸酸对所测试的分离株具有杀菌活性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Antibiotics-Basel
Antibiotics-Basel Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics-General Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics
CiteScore
7.30
自引率
14.60%
发文量
1547
审稿时长
11 weeks
期刊介绍: Antibiotics (ISSN 2079-6382) is an open access, peer reviewed journal on all aspects of antibiotics. Antibiotics is a multi-disciplinary journal encompassing the general fields of biochemistry, chemistry, genetics, microbiology and pharmacology. Our aim is to encourage scientists to publish their experimental and theoretical results in as much detail as possible. Therefore, there is no restriction on the length of papers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信