A Lumped Parameter Modelling Study of Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension Suggests the CSF Formation Rate Varies with the Capillary Transmural Pressure.

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q3 NEUROSCIENCES
Grant A Bateman, Alexander R Bateman
{"title":"A Lumped Parameter Modelling Study of Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension Suggests the CSF Formation Rate Varies with the Capillary Transmural Pressure.","authors":"Grant A Bateman, Alexander R Bateman","doi":"10.3390/brainsci15050527","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background</b>: Idiopathic intracranial hypertension (IIH) is, by definition, of unknown cause. Davson's equation indicates that the increased intracranial pressure (ICP) found in IIH could be due to an increase in the CSF formation rate (CSF<sub>fr</sub>), the CSF outflow resistance (R<sub>out</sub>) or the venous sinus pressure. Studies simultaneously measuring the ICP and sagittal sinus pressures in IIH suggest that there is either a reduction in the R<sub>out</sub> and/or the CSF<sub>fr</sub>. The latter suggests that the increased venous pressure can be the only variable causing this disease process. A study maintaining the ICP at zero showed a significantly elevated CSF<sub>fr</sub> in this disease. The purpose of the current study is to define the most feasible explanation for these findings and to suggest a viable pathophysiology for IIH. <b>Methods</b>: A lumped parameter vascular model, originally developed to study normal pressure hydrocephalus, was extended to investigate IIH. The model used the simultaneously obtained ICP and sagittal sinus pressure measurements from five experiments published in the literature to estimate the CSF<sub>fr</sub> and the capillary transmural pressure (TMP). The assumptions made during this study were those of a normal mean arterial pressure, a normal total R<sub>out</sub> and a normal blood flow rate. <b>Results</b>: When the CSF formation rates were plotted against the estimated capillary transmural pressures, a straight line was returned, suggesting that the CSF<sub>fr</sub> and capillary TMP are related. <b>Conclusions</b>: The novel findings of this study suggest that the CSF<sub>fr</sub> in IIH varies with the capillary TMP. A reduced capillary TMP in IIH can moderate the ICP if there is net CSF absorption across the capillaries. This would require the blood-brain barrier (BBB) to be disrupted. The model suggests that drugs which stabilise the BBB may trigger IIH by blocking CSF absorption across the capillaries, increasing the apparent CSF formation rate back toward normal and increasing the ICP. Anaemia will promote IIH by increasing the cerebral blood flow, the capillary TMP and the CSF<sub>fr</sub>.</p>","PeriodicalId":9095,"journal":{"name":"Brain Sciences","volume":"15 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12110538/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Brain Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci15050527","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Idiopathic intracranial hypertension (IIH) is, by definition, of unknown cause. Davson's equation indicates that the increased intracranial pressure (ICP) found in IIH could be due to an increase in the CSF formation rate (CSFfr), the CSF outflow resistance (Rout) or the venous sinus pressure. Studies simultaneously measuring the ICP and sagittal sinus pressures in IIH suggest that there is either a reduction in the Rout and/or the CSFfr. The latter suggests that the increased venous pressure can be the only variable causing this disease process. A study maintaining the ICP at zero showed a significantly elevated CSFfr in this disease. The purpose of the current study is to define the most feasible explanation for these findings and to suggest a viable pathophysiology for IIH. Methods: A lumped parameter vascular model, originally developed to study normal pressure hydrocephalus, was extended to investigate IIH. The model used the simultaneously obtained ICP and sagittal sinus pressure measurements from five experiments published in the literature to estimate the CSFfr and the capillary transmural pressure (TMP). The assumptions made during this study were those of a normal mean arterial pressure, a normal total Rout and a normal blood flow rate. Results: When the CSF formation rates were plotted against the estimated capillary transmural pressures, a straight line was returned, suggesting that the CSFfr and capillary TMP are related. Conclusions: The novel findings of this study suggest that the CSFfr in IIH varies with the capillary TMP. A reduced capillary TMP in IIH can moderate the ICP if there is net CSF absorption across the capillaries. This would require the blood-brain barrier (BBB) to be disrupted. The model suggests that drugs which stabilise the BBB may trigger IIH by blocking CSF absorption across the capillaries, increasing the apparent CSF formation rate back toward normal and increasing the ICP. Anaemia will promote IIH by increasing the cerebral blood flow, the capillary TMP and the CSFfr.

特发性颅内高压的集总参数模型研究表明脑脊液的形成速率随毛细血管跨壁压力的变化而变化。
背景:特发性颅内高压(IIH)是一种病因不明的疾病。Davson公式提示IIH患者颅内压(ICP)升高可能是由于脑脊液形成率(CSFfr)、脑脊液流出阻力(Rout)或静脉窦压力升高所致。同时测量IIH患者颅内压和矢状窦压的研究表明,Rout和/或CSFfr均有降低。后者表明静脉压升高可能是引起这种疾病过程的唯一变量。一项维持ICP为零的研究显示,该疾病的CSFfr显著升高。当前研究的目的是为这些发现定义最可行的解释,并提出可行的IIH病理生理学。方法:将最初用于研究常压脑积水的集总参数血管模型扩展到IIH研究。该模型使用文献中发表的五个实验同时获得的颅内压和矢状窦压测量值来估计CSFfr和毛细血管跨壁压(TMP)。在本研究中所做的假设是正常的平均动脉压,正常的总路由和正常的血流量。结果:当脑脊液形成速率与估计的毛细血管跨壁压力绘制时,返回一条直线,表明CSF ffr与毛细血管TMP相关。结论:本研究的新发现提示IIH患者的CSFfr随毛细血管TMP的变化而变化。如果毛细血管有净脑脊液吸收,IIH的毛细血管TMP减少可以调节ICP。这需要血脑屏障(BBB)被破坏。该模型表明,稳定血脑屏障的药物可能通过阻断毛细血管对脑脊液的吸收,使脑脊液的表观形成率恢复正常,并增加颅内压,从而引发IIH。贫血会通过增加脑血流量、毛细血管TMP和CSFfr来促进IIH。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Brain Sciences
Brain Sciences Neuroscience-General Neuroscience
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
9.10%
发文量
1472
审稿时长
18.71 days
期刊介绍: Brain Sciences (ISSN 2076-3425) is a peer-reviewed scientific journal that publishes original articles, critical reviews, research notes and short communications in the areas of cognitive neuroscience, developmental neuroscience, molecular and cellular neuroscience, neural engineering, neuroimaging, neurolinguistics, neuropathy, systems neuroscience, and theoretical and computational neuroscience. Our aim is to encourage scientists to publish their experimental and theoretical results in as much detail as possible. There is no restriction on the length of the papers. The full experimental details must be provided so that the results can be reproduced. Electronic files or software regarding the full details of the calculation and experimental procedure, if unable to be published in a normal way, can be deposited as supplementary material.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信