The Influence of Transcranial Alternating Current Stimulation on the Excitability of the Unstimulated Contralateral Primary Motor Cortex.

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q3 NEUROSCIENCES
Erik W Wilkins, Richard J Young, Ryder Davidson, Reese Krider, George Alhwayek, Jonathan A Park, Armaan C Parikh, Zachary A Riley, Brach Poston
{"title":"The Influence of Transcranial Alternating Current Stimulation on the Excitability of the Unstimulated Contralateral Primary Motor Cortex.","authors":"Erik W Wilkins, Richard J Young, Ryder Davidson, Reese Krider, George Alhwayek, Jonathan A Park, Armaan C Parikh, Zachary A Riley, Brach Poston","doi":"10.3390/brainsci15050512","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS) can enhance primary motor cortex (M1) excitability and improve motor skill when delivered unilaterally to the dominant hemisphere. However, the impact of tACS on contralateral M1 excitability both during and after application has not been studied. The purpose of this study was to examine the effects of tACS delivered to the dominant left M1 on the excitability of the unstimulated contralateral non-dominant right M1.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study implemented a double-blind, randomized, SHAM-controlled, within-subjects, crossover experimental design. Eighteen young adults completed a tACS condition and a SHAM condition on two different days in counterbalanced order with a week washout period between days. Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) was utilized to assess excitability of the contralateral right M1 while tACS was delivered to the left M1. TMS was administered in five test blocks (termed Pre, D5, D10, D15, and Post) relative to a 20 min application of tACS (70 Hz, 1 mA current strength). The Pre and Post TMS test blocks were conducted before and immediately after tACS was applied to the left M1, whereas the TMS test blocks performed during tACS were completed at time points starting at the 5, 10, and 15 min marks of the 20 min stimulation period. The primary dependent variable was the 1 mV motor evoked potential (MEP) amplitude. MEP data were analyzed with a 2 <i>condition</i> (tACS, SHAM) × 5 <i>test</i> (Pre, D5, D10, D15, Post) within-subjects ANOVA.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The main effect for <i>condition</i> (<i>p</i> = 0.704) and <i>condition</i> × <i>test</i> interaction (<i>p</i> = 0.349) were both non-statistically significant. There was a significant main effect for <i>test</i> (<i>p</i> = 0.003); however, post hoc analysis indicated that none of the pairwise comparisons were statistically significant.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Overall, the findings indicate that tACS applied to the left M1 does not significantly modulate contralateral right M1 excitability during or immediately after stimulation, at least when utilizing the present tACS parameters.</p>","PeriodicalId":9095,"journal":{"name":"Brain Sciences","volume":"15 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12110175/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Brain Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci15050512","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS) can enhance primary motor cortex (M1) excitability and improve motor skill when delivered unilaterally to the dominant hemisphere. However, the impact of tACS on contralateral M1 excitability both during and after application has not been studied. The purpose of this study was to examine the effects of tACS delivered to the dominant left M1 on the excitability of the unstimulated contralateral non-dominant right M1.

Methods: This study implemented a double-blind, randomized, SHAM-controlled, within-subjects, crossover experimental design. Eighteen young adults completed a tACS condition and a SHAM condition on two different days in counterbalanced order with a week washout period between days. Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) was utilized to assess excitability of the contralateral right M1 while tACS was delivered to the left M1. TMS was administered in five test blocks (termed Pre, D5, D10, D15, and Post) relative to a 20 min application of tACS (70 Hz, 1 mA current strength). The Pre and Post TMS test blocks were conducted before and immediately after tACS was applied to the left M1, whereas the TMS test blocks performed during tACS were completed at time points starting at the 5, 10, and 15 min marks of the 20 min stimulation period. The primary dependent variable was the 1 mV motor evoked potential (MEP) amplitude. MEP data were analyzed with a 2 condition (tACS, SHAM) × 5 test (Pre, D5, D10, D15, Post) within-subjects ANOVA.

Results: The main effect for condition (p = 0.704) and condition × test interaction (p = 0.349) were both non-statistically significant. There was a significant main effect for test (p = 0.003); however, post hoc analysis indicated that none of the pairwise comparisons were statistically significant.

Conclusions: Overall, the findings indicate that tACS applied to the left M1 does not significantly modulate contralateral right M1 excitability during or immediately after stimulation, at least when utilizing the present tACS parameters.

经颅交流电刺激对未刺激的对侧初级运动皮层兴奋性的影响。
目的:经颅交流电刺激(tACS)可以增强初级运动皮层(M1)的兴奋性,并改善运动技能。然而,tACS在应用期间和应用后对对侧M1兴奋性的影响尚未研究。本研究的目的是检验向左侧优势M1传递tACS对未刺激的对侧非优势右M1的兴奋性的影响。方法:本研究采用双盲、随机、sham对照、受试者内、交叉实验设计。18名年轻人在两天内完成了tACS条件和SHAM条件,以平衡的顺序,几天之间有一周的洗脱期。采用经颅磁刺激(TMS)评估对侧右侧M1的兴奋性,同时向左侧M1传递tACS。经颅磁刺激分为5个测试区(分别为Pre, D5, D10, D15和Post),相对于20分钟的tACS应用(70 Hz, 1 mA电流强度)。经颅磁刺激前和后测试分别在左M1施加tACS之前和之后进行,而在tACS期间进行的经颅磁刺激测试则在20分钟刺激期的5分钟、10分钟和15分钟开始的时间点完成。主要因变量为1 mV的运动诱发电位(MEP)振幅。MEP数据采用2条件(tACS, SHAM) × 5检验(Pre, D5, D10, D15, Post)进行受试者内方差分析。结果:条件的主效应(p = 0.704)和条件与检验交互作用(p = 0.349)均无统计学意义。检验主效应显著(p = 0.003);然而,事后分析表明,两两比较没有统计学意义。结论:总的来说,研究结果表明,在刺激期间或刺激后,施加于左M1的tACS并没有显著调节对侧右M1的兴奋性,至少在利用目前的tACS参数时是这样。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Brain Sciences
Brain Sciences Neuroscience-General Neuroscience
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
9.10%
发文量
1472
审稿时长
18.71 days
期刊介绍: Brain Sciences (ISSN 2076-3425) is a peer-reviewed scientific journal that publishes original articles, critical reviews, research notes and short communications in the areas of cognitive neuroscience, developmental neuroscience, molecular and cellular neuroscience, neural engineering, neuroimaging, neurolinguistics, neuropathy, systems neuroscience, and theoretical and computational neuroscience. Our aim is to encourage scientists to publish their experimental and theoretical results in as much detail as possible. There is no restriction on the length of the papers. The full experimental details must be provided so that the results can be reproduced. Electronic files or software regarding the full details of the calculation and experimental procedure, if unable to be published in a normal way, can be deposited as supplementary material.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信