Artificial intelligence assisted nutritional risk evaluation model for critically ill patients: Integration of explainable machine learning in intensive care nutrition.
{"title":"Artificial intelligence assisted nutritional risk evaluation model for critically ill patients: Integration of explainable machine learning in intensive care nutrition.","authors":"Chao-Hsiu Chen, Kai-Chih Pai, Hui-Min Hsieh, Yi-Jui Chan, Hsiao-Lin Hsu, Chen-Yu Wang","doi":"10.6133/apjcn.202506_34(3).0009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>Critically ill patients require individualized nutrition support, with assessment tools like Nutrition Risk Screening 2002 and Nutrition Risk in the Critically Ill scores. Challenges in continu-ous nutrition care prompt the need for innovative solutions. This study develops an artificial intelligence assisted nutrition risk evaluation model using explainable machine learning to support intensive care unit dietitians.</p><p><strong>Methods and study design: </strong>Ethical approval was obtained for a retrospective analysis of 2,122 pa-tients. Nutrition risk assessment involved six dietitians, with 1,994 patients assessed comprehensively. Artificial intelligence models and shapley additive explanations analysis were used to predict and understand nutrition risk.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>High nutrition risk (35.2%) correlated with elder age, lower body weight, BMI, albumin, and higher disease severity. The AUROC scores achieved by XGBoost (0.921), CatBoost (0.926), and LightGBM (0.923) were superior to those of Logistic Regression. Key features influencing nutrition risk included Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II score, albumin, age, BMI, and haemoglobin.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The study introduces an artificial intelligence assisted nutrition risk evaluation model, offering a promising avenue for continuous and timely nutrition support in critically ill patients. External validation and exploration of feature relationships are needed.</p>","PeriodicalId":8486,"journal":{"name":"Asia Pacific journal of clinical nutrition","volume":"34 3","pages":"343-352"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12126293/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asia Pacific journal of clinical nutrition","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.6133/apjcn.202506_34(3).0009","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"NUTRITION & DIETETICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background and objectives: Critically ill patients require individualized nutrition support, with assessment tools like Nutrition Risk Screening 2002 and Nutrition Risk in the Critically Ill scores. Challenges in continu-ous nutrition care prompt the need for innovative solutions. This study develops an artificial intelligence assisted nutrition risk evaluation model using explainable machine learning to support intensive care unit dietitians.
Methods and study design: Ethical approval was obtained for a retrospective analysis of 2,122 pa-tients. Nutrition risk assessment involved six dietitians, with 1,994 patients assessed comprehensively. Artificial intelligence models and shapley additive explanations analysis were used to predict and understand nutrition risk.
Results: High nutrition risk (35.2%) correlated with elder age, lower body weight, BMI, albumin, and higher disease severity. The AUROC scores achieved by XGBoost (0.921), CatBoost (0.926), and LightGBM (0.923) were superior to those of Logistic Regression. Key features influencing nutrition risk included Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II score, albumin, age, BMI, and haemoglobin.
Conclusions: The study introduces an artificial intelligence assisted nutrition risk evaluation model, offering a promising avenue for continuous and timely nutrition support in critically ill patients. External validation and exploration of feature relationships are needed.
期刊介绍:
The aims of the Asia Pacific Journal of Clinical Nutrition
(APJCN) are to publish high quality clinical nutrition relevant research findings which can build the capacity of
clinical nutritionists in the region and enhance the practice of human nutrition and related disciplines for health
promotion and disease prevention. APJCN will publish
original research reports, reviews, short communications
and case reports. News, book reviews and other items will
also be included. The acceptance criteria for all papers are
the quality and originality of the research and its significance to our readership. Except where otherwise stated,
manuscripts are peer-reviewed by at least two anonymous
reviewers and the Editor. The Editorial Board reserves the
right to refuse any material for publication and advises
that authors should retain copies of submitted manuscripts
and correspondence as material cannot be returned. Final
acceptance or rejection rests with the Editorial Board