Artificial intelligence assisted nutritional risk evaluation model for critically ill patients: Integration of explainable machine learning in intensive care nutrition.

IF 1.3 4区 医学 Q4 NUTRITION & DIETETICS
Chao-Hsiu Chen, Kai-Chih Pai, Hui-Min Hsieh, Yi-Jui Chan, Hsiao-Lin Hsu, Chen-Yu Wang
{"title":"Artificial intelligence assisted nutritional risk evaluation model for critically ill patients: Integration of explainable machine learning in intensive care nutrition.","authors":"Chao-Hsiu Chen, Kai-Chih Pai, Hui-Min Hsieh, Yi-Jui Chan, Hsiao-Lin Hsu, Chen-Yu Wang","doi":"10.6133/apjcn.202506_34(3).0009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>Critically ill patients require individualized nutrition support, with assessment tools like Nutrition Risk Screening 2002 and Nutrition Risk in the Critically Ill scores. Challenges in continu-ous nutrition care prompt the need for innovative solutions. This study develops an artificial intelligence assisted nutrition risk evaluation model using explainable machine learning to support intensive care unit dietitians.</p><p><strong>Methods and study design: </strong>Ethical approval was obtained for a retrospective analysis of 2,122 pa-tients. Nutrition risk assessment involved six dietitians, with 1,994 patients assessed comprehensively. Artificial intelligence models and shapley additive explanations analysis were used to predict and understand nutrition risk.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>High nutrition risk (35.2%) correlated with elder age, lower body weight, BMI, albumin, and higher disease severity. The AUROC scores achieved by XGBoost (0.921), CatBoost (0.926), and LightGBM (0.923) were superior to those of Logistic Regression. Key features influencing nutrition risk included Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II score, albumin, age, BMI, and haemoglobin.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The study introduces an artificial intelligence assisted nutrition risk evaluation model, offering a promising avenue for continuous and timely nutrition support in critically ill patients. External validation and exploration of feature relationships are needed.</p>","PeriodicalId":8486,"journal":{"name":"Asia Pacific journal of clinical nutrition","volume":"34 3","pages":"343-352"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12126293/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asia Pacific journal of clinical nutrition","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.6133/apjcn.202506_34(3).0009","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"NUTRITION & DIETETICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and objectives: Critically ill patients require individualized nutrition support, with assessment tools like Nutrition Risk Screening 2002 and Nutrition Risk in the Critically Ill scores. Challenges in continu-ous nutrition care prompt the need for innovative solutions. This study develops an artificial intelligence assisted nutrition risk evaluation model using explainable machine learning to support intensive care unit dietitians.

Methods and study design: Ethical approval was obtained for a retrospective analysis of 2,122 pa-tients. Nutrition risk assessment involved six dietitians, with 1,994 patients assessed comprehensively. Artificial intelligence models and shapley additive explanations analysis were used to predict and understand nutrition risk.

Results: High nutrition risk (35.2%) correlated with elder age, lower body weight, BMI, albumin, and higher disease severity. The AUROC scores achieved by XGBoost (0.921), CatBoost (0.926), and LightGBM (0.923) were superior to those of Logistic Regression. Key features influencing nutrition risk included Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II score, albumin, age, BMI, and haemoglobin.

Conclusions: The study introduces an artificial intelligence assisted nutrition risk evaluation model, offering a promising avenue for continuous and timely nutrition support in critically ill patients. External validation and exploration of feature relationships are needed.

人工智能辅助重症患者营养风险评估模型:可解释机器学习在重症监护营养中的整合。
背景和目的:危重症患者需要个性化的营养支持,评估工具包括2002年营养风险筛查和危重症评分中的营养风险。持续营养护理方面的挑战促使人们需要创新的解决方案。本研究开发了一种人工智能辅助营养风险评估模型,使用可解释的机器学习来支持重症监护病房营养师。方法和研究设计:对2122例患者进行回顾性分析,获得伦理批准。营养风险评估由6名营养师参与,对1994例患者进行了综合评估。采用人工智能模型和shapley加性解释分析来预测和理解营养风险。结果:高营养风险(35.2%)与年龄、较低体重、BMI、白蛋白和较高的疾病严重程度相关。XGBoost(0.921)、CatBoost(0.926)和LightGBM(0.923)的AUROC评分均优于Logistic回归法。影响营养风险的关键特征包括急性生理和慢性健康评估II评分、白蛋白、年龄、BMI和血红蛋白。结论:本研究引入了人工智能辅助营养风险评估模型,为危重患者持续及时的营养支持提供了一条有前景的途径。需要对特征关系进行外部验证和探索。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
7.70%
发文量
58
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The aims of the Asia Pacific Journal of Clinical Nutrition (APJCN) are to publish high quality clinical nutrition relevant research findings which can build the capacity of clinical nutritionists in the region and enhance the practice of human nutrition and related disciplines for health promotion and disease prevention. APJCN will publish original research reports, reviews, short communications and case reports. News, book reviews and other items will also be included. The acceptance criteria for all papers are the quality and originality of the research and its significance to our readership. Except where otherwise stated, manuscripts are peer-reviewed by at least two anonymous reviewers and the Editor. The Editorial Board reserves the right to refuse any material for publication and advises that authors should retain copies of submitted manuscripts and correspondence as material cannot be returned. Final acceptance or rejection rests with the Editorial Board
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信