Ischemic stroke treatment by vagus nerve stimulation: A comprehensive review of mechanisms, clinical efficacy, and future directions

IF 3.1 4区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Penglang Fan , Chao Wu , Bin Liu
{"title":"Ischemic stroke treatment by vagus nerve stimulation: A comprehensive review of mechanisms, clinical efficacy, and future directions","authors":"Penglang Fan ,&nbsp;Chao Wu ,&nbsp;Bin Liu","doi":"10.1016/j.jnrt.2025.100209","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) has emerged as a promising neuromodulatory therapy for ischemic stroke that uses multifaceted mechanisms to address acute injury and chronic recovery. This review synthesizes evidence from preclinical and clinical studies, highlighting three neuroprotective mechanisms of VNS: (1) hemodynamic optimization through cholinergic-mediated vasodilation and neurovascular coupling enhancement, (2) suppression of proinflammatory cascades via the cholinergic anti-inflammatory pathway (e.g., &gt;60% TNF-α reduction in animal models), and (3) facilitation of neuroplasticity via brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) upregulation and reorganization of neural networks. Preclinical studies have demonstrated robust efficacy, including 38% infarct reduction in rodent models, whereas clinical trials have found heterogeneous outcomes, with 65%–82% of patients achieving functional improvement, underscoring the need for personalized protocols. Technological advancements are pivotal: noninvasive transcutaneous VNS (tVNS) offers safer alternatives to comparable acute-phase efficacy, and closed-loop systems integrating electroencephalography (EEG), functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI), and biomarker feedback reduce adverse effects by 37% through adaptive parameter optimization. However, translational challenges persist, including interspecies pathophysiological disparities, trial design heterogeneity, and long-term safety concerns (e.g., 28%–33% incidence of neural adaptation in chronic invasive VNS). Future directions emphasize humanized stroke models, multimodal data integration, and cost-effective tVNS deployment to improve accessibility. This review delineates a roadmap for VNS clinical translation by bridging mechanistic insights with engineering innovations, positioning VHS as a transformative adjunct therapy in precision stroke rehabilitation.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":44709,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Neurorestoratology","volume":"13 4","pages":"Article 100209"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Neurorestoratology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2324242625000312","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) has emerged as a promising neuromodulatory therapy for ischemic stroke that uses multifaceted mechanisms to address acute injury and chronic recovery. This review synthesizes evidence from preclinical and clinical studies, highlighting three neuroprotective mechanisms of VNS: (1) hemodynamic optimization through cholinergic-mediated vasodilation and neurovascular coupling enhancement, (2) suppression of proinflammatory cascades via the cholinergic anti-inflammatory pathway (e.g., >60% TNF-α reduction in animal models), and (3) facilitation of neuroplasticity via brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) upregulation and reorganization of neural networks. Preclinical studies have demonstrated robust efficacy, including 38% infarct reduction in rodent models, whereas clinical trials have found heterogeneous outcomes, with 65%–82% of patients achieving functional improvement, underscoring the need for personalized protocols. Technological advancements are pivotal: noninvasive transcutaneous VNS (tVNS) offers safer alternatives to comparable acute-phase efficacy, and closed-loop systems integrating electroencephalography (EEG), functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI), and biomarker feedback reduce adverse effects by 37% through adaptive parameter optimization. However, translational challenges persist, including interspecies pathophysiological disparities, trial design heterogeneity, and long-term safety concerns (e.g., 28%–33% incidence of neural adaptation in chronic invasive VNS). Future directions emphasize humanized stroke models, multimodal data integration, and cost-effective tVNS deployment to improve accessibility. This review delineates a roadmap for VNS clinical translation by bridging mechanistic insights with engineering innovations, positioning VHS as a transformative adjunct therapy in precision stroke rehabilitation.
迷走神经刺激治疗缺血性卒中:机制、临床疗效和未来发展方向的综合综述
迷走神经刺激(VNS)是一种很有前途的缺血性脑卒中的神经调节治疗方法,它使用多方面的机制来解决急性损伤和慢性恢复。本文综述了临床前和临床研究的证据,重点介绍了VNS的三种神经保护机制:(1)通过胆碱能介导的血管舒张和神经血管耦合增强优化血流动力学;(2)通过胆碱能抗炎途径抑制促炎级联反应(如动物模型中TNF-α降低60%);(3)通过脑源性神经营养因子(BDNF)上调和神经网络重组促进神经可塑性。临床前研究已经证明了强大的疗效,包括在啮齿动物模型中减少38%的梗死,而临床试验发现了不同的结果,65%-82%的患者实现了功能改善,强调了个性化方案的必要性。技术进步至关重要:无创经皮VNS (tVNS)提供了比急性期疗效更安全的替代方案,集成脑电图(EEG)、功能磁共振成像(fMRI)和生物标志物反馈的闭环系统通过自适应参数优化将不良反应减少37%。然而,翻译方面的挑战仍然存在,包括种间病理生理差异、试验设计异质性和长期安全性问题(例如,慢性侵袭性VNS中28%-33%的神经适应发生率)。未来的发展方向是强调人性化的卒中模型、多模式数据集成和高性价比的tVNS部署,以提高可及性。这篇综述描绘了VNS临床翻译的路线图,通过将机械见解与工程创新相结合,将VHS定位为精确中风康复的变革性辅助治疗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Neurorestoratology
Journal of Neurorestoratology CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
18.20%
发文量
22
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信