Experience and qualitative evaluation of two soothing prototypes in psychiatry.

IF 1.2 4区 医学 Q4 NEUROSCIENCES
Noémie Chataigner, Cynthia Fleury, Valérie Gateau
{"title":"Experience and qualitative evaluation of two soothing prototypes in psychiatry.","authors":"Noémie Chataigner, Cynthia Fleury, Valérie Gateau","doi":"10.1016/j.encep.2025.02.008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The need for alternatives to restraint and seclusion in psychiatry is widely recognized. To this end, a collaborative research project between patients, caregivers and designers resulted in the production of two containing prototypes (a covering armchair and a sensory totem). The aim of the research project was to understand whether these prototypes offered a calming alternative and could limit the need for restraint.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Semi-structured interviews were carried out as well as participant observations, and feedback forms were given to participants. Qualitative data analysis was integral and inductive, initially thematic and then oriented according to the \"type of ward\" variable.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The prototypes had beneficial effects on calming and empowering patients; they supported the patient-staff relationship and contributed to team reflexivity. Rather than pathologies, the prototypes responded to appeasement needs and situations of agitation or anxiety. For closed wards, the prototypes were therapeutic and supported patient autonomy in crisis situations. For open wards, they were integrated into the activities offered but needed to be accompanied by caregivers to ensure patient safety.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>The results prompted discussion on three points: 1) research methods in psychiatry and the need to integrate users in research design; 2) conceptions of autonomy in psychiatric care; 3) the place of sensory rooms and soothing techniques in reducing the use of restraint and seclusion.</p>","PeriodicalId":51042,"journal":{"name":"Encephale-Revue De Psychiatrie Clinique Biologique et Therapeutique","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Encephale-Revue De Psychiatrie Clinique Biologique et Therapeutique","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.encep.2025.02.008","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: The need for alternatives to restraint and seclusion in psychiatry is widely recognized. To this end, a collaborative research project between patients, caregivers and designers resulted in the production of two containing prototypes (a covering armchair and a sensory totem). The aim of the research project was to understand whether these prototypes offered a calming alternative and could limit the need for restraint.

Method: Semi-structured interviews were carried out as well as participant observations, and feedback forms were given to participants. Qualitative data analysis was integral and inductive, initially thematic and then oriented according to the "type of ward" variable.

Results: The prototypes had beneficial effects on calming and empowering patients; they supported the patient-staff relationship and contributed to team reflexivity. Rather than pathologies, the prototypes responded to appeasement needs and situations of agitation or anxiety. For closed wards, the prototypes were therapeutic and supported patient autonomy in crisis situations. For open wards, they were integrated into the activities offered but needed to be accompanied by caregivers to ensure patient safety.

Discussion: The results prompted discussion on three points: 1) research methods in psychiatry and the need to integrate users in research design; 2) conceptions of autonomy in psychiatric care; 3) the place of sensory rooms and soothing techniques in reducing the use of restraint and seclusion.

精神病学两种抚慰原型的经验与定性评价。
目的:在精神病学中,需要替代约束和隔离的方法。为此,患者,护理人员和设计师之间的合作研究项目产生了两个包含原型(覆盖扶手椅和感官图腾)。该研究项目的目的是了解这些原型是否提供了一种平静的选择,并可以限制对约束的需求。方法:采用半结构式访谈和参与者观察,并向参与者发放反馈表格。定性数据分析是整体和归纳的,最初是主题,然后根据“病房类型”变量定向。结果:原型对安抚病人和赋予病人权力有有益的作用;他们支持医患关系,促进团队反思。这些原型不是病态的,而是对安抚需求和激动或焦虑的情况做出反应。对于封闭病房,原型是治疗性的,并支持病人在危机情况下的自主权。对于开放式病房,他们被整合到提供的活动中,但需要护理人员陪同,以确保患者安全。讨论:结果引发了三点讨论:1)精神病学的研究方法和在研究设计中整合用户的必要性;2)精神科护理自主性观念;3)感官室和安抚技术在减少使用约束和隔离方面的地位。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
7.40%
发文量
162
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Une revue française de renommée internationale. - Un comite de rédaction représentant tous les aspects de la prise en charge psychiatrique du patient. - Une sélection rigoureuse d''articles faisant l''objet de plusieurs expertises. - Des travaux d''auteurs et de chercheurs de renommée internationale. - Des indexations dans les grandes bases de données (Current Contents, Excerpta Medica, etc.). - Un facteur d''impact qui témoigne de la grande notoriété de la revue. La tribune des publications originales de haut niveau. - Une très grande diversité des sujets traités, rigoureusement sélectionnés à travers des sommaires dynamiques : - des éditoriaux de médecins référents, - une revue de presse sur les actualités internationales, - des articles originaux pour approfondir vos connaissances, - des mises au point et des cas cliniques pour engager votre réflexion sur les indications et choix possibles au travers de mises en situation clinique, - des dossiers thématiques pour faire le tour d''une question. - L''actualité de l''AFPB : L''Encéphale publie régulièrement des comptes rendus de l''Association française de psychiatrie clinique.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信