Diagnostic Scoring in Biliary Atresia.

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q4 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Şükrü Güngör, Fatma İlknur Varol, Ebubekir Altundaş, Emre Gök, Turan Yıldız, Sevgi Demiröz
{"title":"Diagnostic Scoring in Biliary Atresia.","authors":"Şükrü Güngör, Fatma İlknur Varol, Ebubekir Altundaş, Emre Gök, Turan Yıldız, Sevgi Demiröz","doi":"10.5152/tjg.2025.24469","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Background/Aims: The aim of this study was to develop a diagnostic scoring model to predict the need for intraoperative cholangiography in patients with neonatal cholestasis suspected of having biliary atresia (BA) and to aid in the early diagnosis of BA. Materials and Methods: Data from 70 patients with neonatal cholestasis who underwent intraoperative cholangiography with a preliminary diagnosis of BA between 2019 and 2024 were retrospectively reviewed. Data from patients with and without BA were compared. Thescoring was based on 3 parameters: acholic stool observed clinically on inspection, findings suggestive of BA on ultrasound, and elevated gamma-glutamyl transferase (GGT) levels. The best GGT cut-off point for the diagnosis of BA was determined by receiver operating characteristic analysis. The diagnostic success of the scoring model for BA was statistically evaluated. Results: There were no significant differences in age and gender between BA and non-BA groups. Gamma-glutamyl transferase levels were elevated in all patients. Acholic stools were present in 98% of BA patients. Ultrasound findings suggestive of BA were present in 88.5% of patients with BA. The authors found the best GGT cut-off value for the diagnosis of BA to be ≥366 (73% sensitivity, 77.8% specificity). In the scoring model the authors developed, the presence of 2 parameters provided diagnostic success with high sensitivity (98%) and specificity (83.3%). Conclusion: The study provides a reliable and sensitive diagnostic criterion to determine the need for intraoperative cholangiography in infants with neonatal cholestasis. These data should be validated in larger prospective case series.</p>","PeriodicalId":51205,"journal":{"name":"Turkish Journal of Gastroenterology","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Turkish Journal of Gastroenterology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5152/tjg.2025.24469","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background/Aims: The aim of this study was to develop a diagnostic scoring model to predict the need for intraoperative cholangiography in patients with neonatal cholestasis suspected of having biliary atresia (BA) and to aid in the early diagnosis of BA. Materials and Methods: Data from 70 patients with neonatal cholestasis who underwent intraoperative cholangiography with a preliminary diagnosis of BA between 2019 and 2024 were retrospectively reviewed. Data from patients with and without BA were compared. Thescoring was based on 3 parameters: acholic stool observed clinically on inspection, findings suggestive of BA on ultrasound, and elevated gamma-glutamyl transferase (GGT) levels. The best GGT cut-off point for the diagnosis of BA was determined by receiver operating characteristic analysis. The diagnostic success of the scoring model for BA was statistically evaluated. Results: There were no significant differences in age and gender between BA and non-BA groups. Gamma-glutamyl transferase levels were elevated in all patients. Acholic stools were present in 98% of BA patients. Ultrasound findings suggestive of BA were present in 88.5% of patients with BA. The authors found the best GGT cut-off value for the diagnosis of BA to be ≥366 (73% sensitivity, 77.8% specificity). In the scoring model the authors developed, the presence of 2 parameters provided diagnostic success with high sensitivity (98%) and specificity (83.3%). Conclusion: The study provides a reliable and sensitive diagnostic criterion to determine the need for intraoperative cholangiography in infants with neonatal cholestasis. These data should be validated in larger prospective case series.

胆道闭锁的诊断评分。
背景/目的:本研究的目的是建立一个诊断评分模型,以预测怀疑有胆道闭锁(BA)的新生儿胆汁淤积症患者是否需要术中胆道造影,并有助于BA的早期诊断。材料与方法:回顾性分析2019年至2024年间70例初步诊断为BA的新生儿胆汁淤积症术中胆道造影患者的资料。比较有BA和无BA患者的数据。评分基于3个参数:临床检查观察到的胆汁性大便、超声提示BA的结果、γ -谷氨酰转移酶(GGT)水平升高。通过对受者工作特征的分析确定诊断BA的最佳GGT截断点。对BA评分模型的诊断成功率进行统计学评价。结果:BA组与非BA组在年龄、性别上无显著差异。所有患者的γ -谷氨酰转移酶水平均升高。98%的BA患者存在胆汁性便。88.5%的BA患者存在提示BA的超声结果。作者发现诊断BA的最佳GGT临界值≥366(73%敏感性,77.8%特异性)。在作者开发的评分模型中,2个参数的存在提供了高灵敏度(98%)和特异性(83.3%)的诊断成功。结论:本研究为判断新生儿胆汁淤积症患儿是否需要术中胆道造影提供了可靠、灵敏的诊断标准。这些数据应该在更大的前瞻性病例系列中得到验证。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Turkish Journal of Gastroenterology
Turkish Journal of Gastroenterology 医学-胃肠肝病学
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
127
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: The Turkish Journal of Gastroenterology (Turk J Gastroenterol) is the double-blind peer-reviewed, open access, international publication organ of the Turkish Society of Gastroenterology. The journal is a bimonthly publication, published on January, March, May, July, September, November and its publication language is English. The Turkish Journal of Gastroenterology aims to publish international at the highest clinical and scientific level on original issues of gastroenterology and hepatology. The journal publishes original papers, review articles, case reports and letters to the editor on clinical and experimental gastroenterology and hepatology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信