Engineers as Problem-Solvers for Sustainable Development?—Exploring Students' Learning Outcomes From Sustainability and Human Rights-Centered Approaches in Engineering Education

IF 2.8 3区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Minju Lee, Davis Chacón-Hurtado, Shareen Hertel
{"title":"Engineers as Problem-Solvers for Sustainable Development?—Exploring Students' Learning Outcomes From Sustainability and Human Rights-Centered Approaches in Engineering Education","authors":"Minju Lee,&nbsp;Davis Chacón-Hurtado,&nbsp;Shareen Hertel","doi":"10.1111/ejed.70137","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>This paper examines the impact of a human rights framework in engineering education on students' perceptions of sustainability and human rights. Recently, scholars have emphasised the need to develop a new engineering pedagogy and an ethical framework for the workforce. This emphasis arises from the fact that, as the engineering workforce has become multicultural and globalised, prospective engineers require new ideas, technologies, perspectives and professional ethics to adapt to the changing world. In this context, scholars have primarily focused on creating sustainable approaches that highlight the coexistence between humans and nature, along with equity, diversity and human dignity, while also developing educational strategies to challenge the conventional notion of engineers as problem-solvers. The University of Connecticut (UConn) has developed a curriculum that equips students with the core concepts and methodological tools essential for understanding the socially and environmentally responsive roles of engineers and their solutions. This paper examines learning outcomes in an existing course within this curriculum, ‘Engineering for Human Rights’, by analysing original, anonymized exit survey data and anonymized SET evaluations from enrolled students. We also assess the instructors' reflections on the class. The findings of our research contribute to broader discussions of innovation in engineering pedagogy.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":47585,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Education","volume":"60 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Education","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ejed.70137","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper examines the impact of a human rights framework in engineering education on students' perceptions of sustainability and human rights. Recently, scholars have emphasised the need to develop a new engineering pedagogy and an ethical framework for the workforce. This emphasis arises from the fact that, as the engineering workforce has become multicultural and globalised, prospective engineers require new ideas, technologies, perspectives and professional ethics to adapt to the changing world. In this context, scholars have primarily focused on creating sustainable approaches that highlight the coexistence between humans and nature, along with equity, diversity and human dignity, while also developing educational strategies to challenge the conventional notion of engineers as problem-solvers. The University of Connecticut (UConn) has developed a curriculum that equips students with the core concepts and methodological tools essential for understanding the socially and environmentally responsive roles of engineers and their solutions. This paper examines learning outcomes in an existing course within this curriculum, ‘Engineering for Human Rights’, by analysing original, anonymized exit survey data and anonymized SET evaluations from enrolled students. We also assess the instructors' reflections on the class. The findings of our research contribute to broader discussions of innovation in engineering pedagogy.

工程师是可持续发展的问题解决者?-探索工程教育中以可持续性和人权为中心的方法对学生学习成果的影响
本文考察了工程教育中人权框架对学生可持续性和人权观念的影响。最近,学者们强调需要为劳动力开发一种新的工程教学法和道德框架。这种强调源于这样一个事实,即随着工程劳动力变得多元文化和全球化,未来的工程师需要新的想法、技术、观点和职业道德来适应不断变化的世界。在这种背景下,学者们主要关注创造可持续的方法,强调人与自然的共存,以及公平、多样性和人类尊严,同时也制定教育策略,挑战工程师作为问题解决者的传统观念。康涅狄格大学(UConn)开发了一门课程,为学生提供核心概念和方法工具,这些概念和方法工具对于理解工程师的社会和环境响应作用及其解决方案至关重要。本文通过分析原始的匿名退出调查数据和注册学生的匿名SET评估,研究了该课程中现有课程“人权工程”的学习成果。我们也评估教师对课堂的反思。我们的研究结果有助于更广泛地讨论工程教育学的创新。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
European Journal of Education
European Journal of Education EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
47
期刊介绍: The prime aims of the European Journal of Education are: - To examine, compare and assess education policies, trends, reforms and programmes of European countries in an international perspective - To disseminate policy debates and research results to a wide audience of academics, researchers, practitioners and students of education sciences - To contribute to the policy debate at the national and European level by providing European administrators and policy-makers in international organisations, national and local governments with comparative and up-to-date material centred on specific themes of common interest.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信