Sleuthing subjectivity: a review of covert measures of consciousness

IF 34.7 1区 医学 Q1 Neuroscience
Sharif I. Kronemer, Peter A. Bandettini, Javier Gonzalez-Castillo
{"title":"Sleuthing subjectivity: a review of covert measures of consciousness","authors":"Sharif I. Kronemer, Peter A. Bandettini, Javier Gonzalez-Castillo","doi":"10.1038/s41583-025-00934-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Consciousness is private. Although conscious beings directly access their own conscious experiences, the consciousness of others must be inferred through overt report: observable behaviours — such as overt facial expressions, vocalizations and body gestures — that suggest the level, state and content of consciousness. However, overt report is limited because it can be erroneous (for example, resulting from wilful deception or being subject to recall error), absent (for example, during sleep and paralysis) or conflict with research goals (for example, in no-report paradigms and resting-state studies). These limitations encourage the search for covert measures of consciousness: physiological signals that disclose consciousness without relying on overt behaviour. This Review highlights emerging covert measures of consciousness in humans, including eye, skin, respiratory and heart signals. We also address the challenge of distinguishing physiological signals linked to conscious versus unconscious neural processing. Finally, we consider the ethical implications of infringing on the innate privacy of consciousness.</p>","PeriodicalId":19082,"journal":{"name":"Nature Reviews Neuroscience","volume":"21 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":34.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nature Reviews Neuroscience","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41583-025-00934-1","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Neuroscience","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Consciousness is private. Although conscious beings directly access their own conscious experiences, the consciousness of others must be inferred through overt report: observable behaviours — such as overt facial expressions, vocalizations and body gestures — that suggest the level, state and content of consciousness. However, overt report is limited because it can be erroneous (for example, resulting from wilful deception or being subject to recall error), absent (for example, during sleep and paralysis) or conflict with research goals (for example, in no-report paradigms and resting-state studies). These limitations encourage the search for covert measures of consciousness: physiological signals that disclose consciousness without relying on overt behaviour. This Review highlights emerging covert measures of consciousness in humans, including eye, skin, respiratory and heart signals. We also address the challenge of distinguishing physiological signals linked to conscious versus unconscious neural processing. Finally, we consider the ethical implications of infringing on the innate privacy of consciousness.

Abstract Image

侦查主体性:对意识的隐蔽测量的回顾
意识是私人的。尽管有意识的人直接接触到他们自己的意识体验,但其他人的意识必须通过公开的报告来推断:可观察到的行为——比如公开的面部表情、发声和肢体动作——表明了意识的水平、状态和内容。然而,公开报告是有限的,因为它可能是错误的(例如,由于故意欺骗或受到回忆错误的影响),缺席(例如,在睡眠和瘫痪期间)或与研究目标冲突(例如,在无报告范式和静息状态研究中)。这些限制促使人们寻找意识的隐蔽测量方法:不依赖于公开行为而揭示意识的生理信号。本综述重点介绍了新出现的人类意识的隐蔽测量,包括眼睛、皮肤、呼吸和心脏信号。我们还解决了区分与有意识和无意识神经处理相关的生理信号的挑战。最后,我们考虑侵犯意识的固有隐私的伦理含义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Nature Reviews Neuroscience
Nature Reviews Neuroscience 医学-神经科学
CiteScore
35.00
自引率
0.60%
发文量
104
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Nature Reviews Neuroscience is a journal that is part of the Nature Reviews portfolio. It focuses on the multidisciplinary science of neuroscience, which aims to provide a complete understanding of the structure and function of the central nervous system. Advances in molecular, developmental, and cognitive neuroscience have made it possible to tackle longstanding neurobiological questions. However, the wealth of knowledge generated by these advancements has created a need for new tools to organize and communicate this information efficiently. Nature Reviews Neuroscience aims to fulfill this need by offering an authoritative, accessible, topical, and engaging resource for scientists interested in all aspects of neuroscience. The journal covers subjects such as cellular and molecular neuroscience, development of the nervous system, sensory and motor systems, behavior, regulatory systems, higher cognition and language, computational neuroscience, and disorders of the brain. Editorial decisions for the journal are made by a team of full-time professional editors who are PhD-level scientists.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信