Ecological Momentary Assessment in Eating Disorders Research: A Qualitative Examination of Participant Experience and Recommendations for Future Studies.

IF 4.7 2区 医学 Q1 NUTRITION & DIETETICS
Samantha Wilson, Laura Lapadat, Lisa Y Zhu, Sarah E Racine
{"title":"Ecological Momentary Assessment in Eating Disorders Research: A Qualitative Examination of Participant Experience and Recommendations for Future Studies.","authors":"Samantha Wilson, Laura Lapadat, Lisa Y Zhu, Sarah E Racine","doi":"10.1002/eat.24473","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Ecological momentary assessment (EMA) is a widely-used research method for investigating temporal relationships among eating disorder (ED) symptoms. Though EMA has many methodological advantages (e.g., reducing retrospective recall bias), little is known about the experience and effects of participating in this type of study from the perspective of individuals with EDs. The present study aimed to examine the experience of participants with EDs after completing an EMA study, with the goal of elucidating potential positive and negative effects of EMA methodology.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>A heterogeneous sample of participants with EDs (N = 192) completed clinical interviews, questionnaires, and an EMA protocol (five surveys/day for 14 days). A subsample of these participants (n = 16) completed a qualitative interview exploring their experience participating in the study. A reflexive thematic analysis was conducted using Nvivo software.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The following themes were identified: (1) Self-awareness, mindfulness, and reflection; (2) Behavioral change; (3) Rewarding aspects of the study; (4) Challenging aspects of the study; (5) Study design (including facilitators and barriers to participating); and (6) Suggestions for future studies.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Although participants reported some challenging aspects of the study, most described their experience as positive (or at least neutral), and many noted direct benefits of participating. Future EMA research may benefit from integrating the perspectives of those with lived experience into study design, potentially reducing participant burden, improving the quantity and quality of data collected, and increasing benefits for participants.</p>","PeriodicalId":51067,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Eating Disorders","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Eating Disorders","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/eat.24473","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NUTRITION & DIETETICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Ecological momentary assessment (EMA) is a widely-used research method for investigating temporal relationships among eating disorder (ED) symptoms. Though EMA has many methodological advantages (e.g., reducing retrospective recall bias), little is known about the experience and effects of participating in this type of study from the perspective of individuals with EDs. The present study aimed to examine the experience of participants with EDs after completing an EMA study, with the goal of elucidating potential positive and negative effects of EMA methodology.

Method: A heterogeneous sample of participants with EDs (N = 192) completed clinical interviews, questionnaires, and an EMA protocol (five surveys/day for 14 days). A subsample of these participants (n = 16) completed a qualitative interview exploring their experience participating in the study. A reflexive thematic analysis was conducted using Nvivo software.

Results: The following themes were identified: (1) Self-awareness, mindfulness, and reflection; (2) Behavioral change; (3) Rewarding aspects of the study; (4) Challenging aspects of the study; (5) Study design (including facilitators and barriers to participating); and (6) Suggestions for future studies.

Discussion: Although participants reported some challenging aspects of the study, most described their experience as positive (or at least neutral), and many noted direct benefits of participating. Future EMA research may benefit from integrating the perspectives of those with lived experience into study design, potentially reducing participant burden, improving the quantity and quality of data collected, and increasing benefits for participants.

进食障碍研究中的生态瞬时评估:参与者经验的定性检验及对未来研究的建议。
目的:生态瞬时评价(EMA)是一种广泛应用于研究进食障碍(ED)症状间时间关系的研究方法。尽管EMA有许多方法学上的优势(例如,减少回顾性回忆偏差),但从ed患者的角度来看,参与这类研究的经验和效果知之甚少。本研究旨在研究完成EMA研究后EDs患者的经历,目的是阐明EMA方法的潜在积极和消极影响。方法:对患有EDs的参与者(N = 192)进行异质抽样,完成临床访谈、问卷调查和EMA方案(每天5次调查,持续14天)。这些参与者的子样本(n = 16)完成了一个定性访谈,探讨他们参与研究的经历。使用Nvivo软件进行反身性专题分析。结果:确定了以下主题:(1)自我意识、正念和反思;(2)行为改变;(3)研究的奖励方面;(4)研究的挑战性方面;(5)研究设计(包括参与的促进因素和障碍);(6)对未来研究的建议。讨论:尽管参与者报告了研究中一些具有挑战性的方面,但大多数人都将他们的经历描述为积极的(或至少是中性的),许多人指出了参与的直接好处。未来的EMA研究可能会受益于将有生活经验的人的观点整合到研究设计中,有可能减轻参与者的负担,提高收集数据的数量和质量,并增加参与者的利益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
10.00
自引率
12.70%
发文量
204
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Articles featured in the journal describe state-of-the-art scientific research on theory, methodology, etiology, clinical practice, and policy related to eating disorders, as well as contributions that facilitate scholarly critique and discussion of science and practice in the field. Theoretical and empirical work on obesity or healthy eating falls within the journal’s scope inasmuch as it facilitates the advancement of efforts to describe and understand, prevent, or treat eating disorders. IJED welcomes submissions from all regions of the world and representing all levels of inquiry (including basic science, clinical trials, implementation research, and dissemination studies), and across a full range of scientific methods, disciplines, and approaches.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信