Fluorodeoxyglucose-Positron Emission Tomography as a Preoperative Biomarker for Predicting and Optimizing Response to Subcallosal Cingulate Area Deep Brain Stimulation.
Gavin J B Elias, Sarah A Iskin, Michelle E Beyn, Uyiosa Omere, Sakina J Rizvi, Amanda K Ceniti, Alexandre Boutet, Daphne Voineskos, Sidney H Kennedy, Andres M Lozano, Jürgen Germann
{"title":"Fluorodeoxyglucose-Positron Emission Tomography as a Preoperative Biomarker for Predicting and Optimizing Response to Subcallosal Cingulate Area Deep Brain Stimulation.","authors":"Gavin J B Elias, Sarah A Iskin, Michelle E Beyn, Uyiosa Omere, Sakina J Rizvi, Amanda K Ceniti, Alexandre Boutet, Daphne Voineskos, Sidney H Kennedy, Andres M Lozano, Jürgen Germann","doi":"10.1016/j.biopsych.2025.05.009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Deep brain stimulation targeting the subcallosal cingulate area (SCC-DBS) has emerged as a promising therapy for treatment-resistant depression (TRD). However, only one-half to two-thirds of patients experience meaningful clinical response, highlighting the need for biomarkers that could help to optimize SCC-DBS outcomes. Our group previously showed that a support vector machine (SVM) incorporating preoperative fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) glucose metabolism values from the frontal pole, anterior cingulate cortex, and temporal pole could retrospectively classify treatment response in 21 patients with TRD with 81.0% accuracy. Here, we assessed the out-of-sample performance and wider applicability of this putative biomarker.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Baseline FDG-PET data were preprocessed and fed into an SVM classifier. This model, which utilized the 3 regional inputs mentioned above, was trained and tuned using the familiar 21-patient cohort and tested on an unseen TRD validation set (n = 35). Within the combined cohort, we also explored glucose metabolism's potential influence on previously demonstrated relationships between white matter tract stimulation and clinical outcome.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Our model classified out-of-sample response status with 77.1% accuracy (80.0% precision, 87.0% recall, 0.83 F1 score). This performance proved statistically significant in permutation testing (p<sub>permute</sub> = .008) and exceeded that of an alternative, clinically informed SVM. In addition, we found that patients with lower temporal pole metabolism showed stronger coupling between uncinate fasciculus engagement (approximated using electrode localization and activation modeling) and clinical outcome (p = .027).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>These results corroborate the validity of FDG-PET models as tools for predicting SCC-DBS outcomes and underscore their value in refining patient selection and further personalizing DBS treatment.</p>","PeriodicalId":8918,"journal":{"name":"Biological Psychiatry","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":9.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biological Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsych.2025.05.009","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Deep brain stimulation targeting the subcallosal cingulate area (SCC-DBS) has emerged as a promising therapy for treatment-resistant depression (TRD). However, only one-half to two-thirds of patients experience meaningful clinical response, highlighting the need for biomarkers that could help to optimize SCC-DBS outcomes. Our group previously showed that a support vector machine (SVM) incorporating preoperative fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) glucose metabolism values from the frontal pole, anterior cingulate cortex, and temporal pole could retrospectively classify treatment response in 21 patients with TRD with 81.0% accuracy. Here, we assessed the out-of-sample performance and wider applicability of this putative biomarker.
Methods: Baseline FDG-PET data were preprocessed and fed into an SVM classifier. This model, which utilized the 3 regional inputs mentioned above, was trained and tuned using the familiar 21-patient cohort and tested on an unseen TRD validation set (n = 35). Within the combined cohort, we also explored glucose metabolism's potential influence on previously demonstrated relationships between white matter tract stimulation and clinical outcome.
Results: Our model classified out-of-sample response status with 77.1% accuracy (80.0% precision, 87.0% recall, 0.83 F1 score). This performance proved statistically significant in permutation testing (ppermute = .008) and exceeded that of an alternative, clinically informed SVM. In addition, we found that patients with lower temporal pole metabolism showed stronger coupling between uncinate fasciculus engagement (approximated using electrode localization and activation modeling) and clinical outcome (p = .027).
Conclusions: These results corroborate the validity of FDG-PET models as tools for predicting SCC-DBS outcomes and underscore their value in refining patient selection and further personalizing DBS treatment.
期刊介绍:
Biological Psychiatry is an official journal of the Society of Biological Psychiatry and was established in 1969. It is the first journal in the Biological Psychiatry family, which also includes Biological Psychiatry: Cognitive Neuroscience and Neuroimaging and Biological Psychiatry: Global Open Science. The Society's main goal is to promote excellence in scientific research and education in the fields related to the nature, causes, mechanisms, and treatments of disorders pertaining to thought, emotion, and behavior. To fulfill this mission, Biological Psychiatry publishes peer-reviewed, rapid-publication articles that present new findings from original basic, translational, and clinical mechanistic research, ultimately advancing our understanding of psychiatric disorders and their treatment. The journal also encourages the submission of reviews and commentaries on current research and topics of interest.