{"title":"Informal caregivers’ attitudes towards care robots: A mixed methods systematic review","authors":"Jingyang Wang , Xiaohui Dong , Shi Chen , Xianying Lu, Xinyu Chen, Huanle Liu, Shasha Wen, Shirui Tang, Ting Zhao, Chaoming Hou , Jing Gao","doi":"10.1016/j.arr.2025.102778","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Care Robots (CRs) are capable of performing a multitude of caregiving tasks, demonstrating potential in addressing the aging crisis. However, the implementation of CRs faces challenges, and user attitudes are vital for implementation of CRs. Informal caregivers (ICs), who are the primary providers of care and bear the heavy burden of caregiving, are seldom studied in terms of their attitudes toward CRs.</div></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To systematically review the ICs’ attitudes towards CRs.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>The PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, CINAHL, and IEEE Xplore were searched from inception to September 2024. Studies related to ICs’ attitudes towards CRs were included. This review followed the methodology for mixed-methods reviews outlined by the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) and employed a convergent integrated approach for this study.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>34 studies were included, including six quantitative studies, eighteen qualitative studies and ten mixed methods studies. Following thematic analysis and synthesis, four broad analytic themes were identified for concept of CRs, expectations of CRs, facilitators and barriers to use CRs, and ethical concerns of CRs.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>ICs generally accepted the use of CRs, but they also reported some concerns about using CRs for implement. In order to support the safe, equitable, and people-oriented implementation of CRs in the long-term care system, we propose consider the ICs’ attitudes to optimize CRs, offer more technical support to ICs, and find a way to balance the conflict of use right between ICs and care recipients.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":55545,"journal":{"name":"Ageing Research Reviews","volume":"110 ","pages":"Article 102778"},"PeriodicalIF":12.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ageing Research Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1568163725001242","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CELL BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background
Care Robots (CRs) are capable of performing a multitude of caregiving tasks, demonstrating potential in addressing the aging crisis. However, the implementation of CRs faces challenges, and user attitudes are vital for implementation of CRs. Informal caregivers (ICs), who are the primary providers of care and bear the heavy burden of caregiving, are seldom studied in terms of their attitudes toward CRs.
Objective
To systematically review the ICs’ attitudes towards CRs.
Methods
The PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, CINAHL, and IEEE Xplore were searched from inception to September 2024. Studies related to ICs’ attitudes towards CRs were included. This review followed the methodology for mixed-methods reviews outlined by the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) and employed a convergent integrated approach for this study.
Results
34 studies were included, including six quantitative studies, eighteen qualitative studies and ten mixed methods studies. Following thematic analysis and synthesis, four broad analytic themes were identified for concept of CRs, expectations of CRs, facilitators and barriers to use CRs, and ethical concerns of CRs.
Conclusions
ICs generally accepted the use of CRs, but they also reported some concerns about using CRs for implement. In order to support the safe, equitable, and people-oriented implementation of CRs in the long-term care system, we propose consider the ICs’ attitudes to optimize CRs, offer more technical support to ICs, and find a way to balance the conflict of use right between ICs and care recipients.
期刊介绍:
With the rise in average human life expectancy, the impact of ageing and age-related diseases on our society has become increasingly significant. Ageing research is now a focal point for numerous laboratories, encompassing leaders in genetics, molecular and cellular biology, biochemistry, and behavior. Ageing Research Reviews (ARR) serves as a cornerstone in this field, addressing emerging trends.
ARR aims to fill a substantial gap by providing critical reviews and viewpoints on evolving discoveries concerning the mechanisms of ageing and age-related diseases. The rapid progress in understanding the mechanisms controlling cellular proliferation, differentiation, and survival is unveiling new insights into the regulation of ageing. From telomerase to stem cells, and from energy to oxyradical metabolism, we are witnessing an exciting era in the multidisciplinary field of ageing research.
The journal explores the cellular and molecular foundations of interventions that extend lifespan, such as caloric restriction. It identifies the underpinnings of manipulations that extend lifespan, shedding light on novel approaches for preventing age-related diseases. ARR publishes articles on focused topics selected from the expansive field of ageing research, with a particular emphasis on the cellular and molecular mechanisms of the aging process. This includes age-related diseases like cancer, cardiovascular disease, diabetes, and neurodegenerative disorders. The journal also covers applications of basic ageing research to lifespan extension and disease prevention, offering a comprehensive platform for advancing our understanding of this critical field.