Tracking and Trajectory Analysis of Active Commuting from Childhood to Midlife.

Xiaolin Yang,Tuomas Kukko,Kasper Salin,Janne Kulmala,Suvi P Rovio,Katja Pahkala,Terho Lehtimäki,Olli T Raitakari,Tuija H Tammelin
{"title":"Tracking and Trajectory Analysis of Active Commuting from Childhood to Midlife.","authors":"Xiaolin Yang,Tuomas Kukko,Kasper Salin,Janne Kulmala,Suvi P Rovio,Katja Pahkala,Terho Lehtimäki,Olli T Raitakari,Tuija H Tammelin","doi":"10.1249/mss.0000000000003760","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"PURPOSE\r\nTo examine the tracking and trajectories of active commuting (AC) from childhood to midlife and their association with physical activity (PA) levels over 35 years.\r\n\r\nMETHODS\r\nSelf-rated AC and PA data were extracted from the Young Finns Study across six phases (1983 - 2018) for tracking (n = 2851) and trajectories (n = 1220). Accelerometer-derived PA was quantified in 2018-2020 (n = 1134). AC tracking was analyzed using Spearman's correlation, percentage agreements, and kappa statistics. Latent class analysis was used to identify distinct AC trajectories, and their associations with adult PA were subsequently evaluated.\r\n\r\nRESULTS\r\nTracking correlations of AC over 3 - 4, 6 - 7, 15, 18, and 35 years for both sexes were 0.40 - 0.43, 0.30 - 0.33, 0.25 - 0.32, 0.20 - 0.23, and 0.15 - 0.22 in summer, and 0.38 - 0.42, 0.35 - 0.41, 0.30 - 0.40, 0.25 - 0.33, and 0.23 - 0.31 in winter, respectively. Percentage agreements exceeded 54%, with kappa statistics ranging from slight to fair over time. Based on AC trajectories, four classes were identified for men (M) and five for women (W): stable car commuting (M:58.9%, W:37.4%), decreasing AC (M:16.5%, W:22.2%), increasing AC (M:12.8%, W:17.3%), and stable AC (M:11.8%), stable active walking (W:12.2%), and stable active summer cycling (W:10.8%). Compared to stable car-commuting ones, women who consistently walked or cycled in summer had higher adult moderate-to-vigorous PA and step counts. Men with consistent AC accumulated more steps and higher self-reported PA. Increasing AC in men also reported higher total PA. Stable AC participants were more physically active on weekdays, while men in the increased AC group were more active on weekends.\r\n\r\nCONCLUSIONS\r\nTracking of AC from childhood to mid-adulthood was low to moderately high. Stable and increasing AC trajectories predicted higher adult PA levels during weekdays or weekends.","PeriodicalId":18500,"journal":{"name":"Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise","volume":"136 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1249/mss.0000000000003760","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

PURPOSE To examine the tracking and trajectories of active commuting (AC) from childhood to midlife and their association with physical activity (PA) levels over 35 years. METHODS Self-rated AC and PA data were extracted from the Young Finns Study across six phases (1983 - 2018) for tracking (n = 2851) and trajectories (n = 1220). Accelerometer-derived PA was quantified in 2018-2020 (n = 1134). AC tracking was analyzed using Spearman's correlation, percentage agreements, and kappa statistics. Latent class analysis was used to identify distinct AC trajectories, and their associations with adult PA were subsequently evaluated. RESULTS Tracking correlations of AC over 3 - 4, 6 - 7, 15, 18, and 35 years for both sexes were 0.40 - 0.43, 0.30 - 0.33, 0.25 - 0.32, 0.20 - 0.23, and 0.15 - 0.22 in summer, and 0.38 - 0.42, 0.35 - 0.41, 0.30 - 0.40, 0.25 - 0.33, and 0.23 - 0.31 in winter, respectively. Percentage agreements exceeded 54%, with kappa statistics ranging from slight to fair over time. Based on AC trajectories, four classes were identified for men (M) and five for women (W): stable car commuting (M:58.9%, W:37.4%), decreasing AC (M:16.5%, W:22.2%), increasing AC (M:12.8%, W:17.3%), and stable AC (M:11.8%), stable active walking (W:12.2%), and stable active summer cycling (W:10.8%). Compared to stable car-commuting ones, women who consistently walked or cycled in summer had higher adult moderate-to-vigorous PA and step counts. Men with consistent AC accumulated more steps and higher self-reported PA. Increasing AC in men also reported higher total PA. Stable AC participants were more physically active on weekdays, while men in the increased AC group were more active on weekends. CONCLUSIONS Tracking of AC from childhood to mid-adulthood was low to moderately high. Stable and increasing AC trajectories predicted higher adult PA levels during weekdays or weekends.
儿童至中年主动通勤的追踪与轨迹分析。
目的探讨35年来儿童到中年的主动通勤(AC)轨迹及其与身体活动(PA)水平的关系。方法:从青年芬兰人研究中提取六个阶段(1983 - 2018)的自评AC和PA数据,用于跟踪(n = 2851)和轨迹(n = 1220)。加速度计衍生的PA在2018-2020年被量化(n = 1134)。AC跟踪分析使用Spearman的相关性,百分比协议和kappa统计。潜在类别分析用于识别不同的AC轨迹,并随后评估其与成人PA的关联。结果3 ~ 4年、6 ~ 7年、15年、18年、35年男女AC的相关系数夏季分别为0.40 ~ 0.43、0.30 ~ 0.33、0.25 ~ 0.32、0.20 ~ 0.23、0.15 ~ 0.22,冬季分别为0.38 ~ 0.42、0.35 ~ 0.41、0.30 ~ 0.40、0.25 ~ 0.33、0.23 ~ 0.31。同意的百分比超过54%,kappa的统计数据随着时间的推移从轻微到公平不等。基于交流轨迹,男性(M)和女性(W)分为4类:稳定的汽车通勤(M:58.9%, W:37.4%)、减少的交流(M:16.5%, W:22.2%)、增加的交流(M:12.8%, W:17.3%)、稳定的交流(M:11.8%)、稳定的积极步行(W:12.2%)和稳定的积极夏季骑行(W:10.8%)。与稳定的开车上下班的女性相比,在夏天坚持步行或骑自行车的女性成年后的PA和步数更高。经常锻炼的男性累积的步数更多,自我报告的PA也更高。男性AC增加也报告了更高的总PA。交流电稳定的参与者在工作日更活跃,而交流电增加的一组男性在周末更活跃。结论AC在儿童期至成年中期呈低-中高水平。稳定和增加的AC轨迹预测在工作日或周末较高的成人PA水平。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信