Relationship between the G Tolerance, Physical Performance, and Cardiac Force Index in Male Aircrew: A Prospective Observational Study.

Chung-Yu Lai,Wun-Wei Huang,Chien-Lin Kuo,Wei-Chi Tsai,Ching-Chun Chang,Nai-Jen Chang
{"title":"Relationship between the G Tolerance, Physical Performance, and Cardiac Force Index in Male Aircrew: A Prospective Observational Study.","authors":"Chung-Yu Lai,Wun-Wei Huang,Chien-Lin Kuo,Wei-Chi Tsai,Ching-Chun Chang,Nai-Jen Chang","doi":"10.1249/mss.0000000000003763","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"PURPOSE\r\nWhether G tolerance is correlated physical performances and cardiac force index (CFI) in male aircrew.\r\n\r\nMETHODS\r\nOne month before the high G training, military flight cadets provided demographic data and details about their exercise habits. They wore BioPatch™ HP devices to track cardiac data, including walking CFI (WCFI), and during the 100-meter sprint tests. Jump performance was assessed on the training day by measuring peak power output, peak power output normalized to total body mass, the product of force and time at the moment of the jump, and vertical jump height. Relaxed G tolerance (RGT) and straining G tolerance (SGT) were evaluated using a gradual onset rate. Logistic regression was used to analyze the relationships between G tolerance, physical performance, and CFI.\r\n\r\nRESULTS\r\nThere were 53 male trainees classified in the low tolerance group and 29 ones in the high tolerance group. The finish time for the sprint in the high tolerance group averaged 14.1 ± 1.0 seconds, which was shorter than the 14.4 ± 1.1 seconds recorded for the low tolerance group. A higher WCFI (>0.15 vs. ≤0.15) before the sprint was consistently associated with enhanced G tolerance performance, with an adjusted odds ratio (aOR) of 3.72 [95% confidence interval (CI): 1.10-12.60]. Conversely, the sprint completion time was negatively associated with G tolerance (aOR: 0.38, 95% CI: 0.15-0.95).\r\n\r\nCONCLUSIONS\r\nOur findings indicate that a higher WCFI and shorter sprint times prior to the high G training are positively correlated with the G tolerance. Aircrew training centers may integrate sprint and jump tests alongside cardiovascular monitoring to classify cadets into high or low G tolerance groups for further personalized training regimens.","PeriodicalId":18500,"journal":{"name":"Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise","volume":"19 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1249/mss.0000000000003763","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

PURPOSE Whether G tolerance is correlated physical performances and cardiac force index (CFI) in male aircrew. METHODS One month before the high G training, military flight cadets provided demographic data and details about their exercise habits. They wore BioPatch™ HP devices to track cardiac data, including walking CFI (WCFI), and during the 100-meter sprint tests. Jump performance was assessed on the training day by measuring peak power output, peak power output normalized to total body mass, the product of force and time at the moment of the jump, and vertical jump height. Relaxed G tolerance (RGT) and straining G tolerance (SGT) were evaluated using a gradual onset rate. Logistic regression was used to analyze the relationships between G tolerance, physical performance, and CFI. RESULTS There were 53 male trainees classified in the low tolerance group and 29 ones in the high tolerance group. The finish time for the sprint in the high tolerance group averaged 14.1 ± 1.0 seconds, which was shorter than the 14.4 ± 1.1 seconds recorded for the low tolerance group. A higher WCFI (>0.15 vs. ≤0.15) before the sprint was consistently associated with enhanced G tolerance performance, with an adjusted odds ratio (aOR) of 3.72 [95% confidence interval (CI): 1.10-12.60]. Conversely, the sprint completion time was negatively associated with G tolerance (aOR: 0.38, 95% CI: 0.15-0.95). CONCLUSIONS Our findings indicate that a higher WCFI and shorter sprint times prior to the high G training are positively correlated with the G tolerance. Aircrew training centers may integrate sprint and jump tests alongside cardiovascular monitoring to classify cadets into high or low G tolerance groups for further personalized training regimens.
男性空乘人员G耐量、体能表现和心肌力指数的关系:一项前瞻性观察研究。
目的探讨男性空勤人员G耐量与体能及心力指数(CFI)的相关性。方法在高G训练前1个月,对军事飞行学员进行人口统计和运动习惯的详细描述。他们佩戴BioPatch™HP设备来跟踪心脏数据,包括步行CFI (WCFI)和100米冲刺测试。在训练当天,通过测量峰值功率输出、峰值功率输出与总体重的归一化、起跳时刻力与时间的乘积以及垂直起跳高度来评估起跳成绩。采用逐渐发病率评价松弛G耐受性(RGT)和紧张G耐受性(SGT)。采用Logistic回归分析G耐受性、体能表现和CFI之间的关系。结果男性学员低耐受性组53人,高耐受性组29人。高耐受性组的冲刺完成时间平均为14.1±1.0秒,比低耐受性组的14.4±1.1秒短。冲刺前较高的WCFI (>0.15 vs≤0.15)始终与G耐受性能增强相关,调整优势比(aOR)为3.72[95%置信区间(CI): 1.10-12.60]。相反,冲刺完成时间与G耐受性呈负相关(aOR: 0.38, 95% CI: 0.15-0.95)。结论高G训练前较高的WCFI和较短的冲刺时间与G耐量呈正相关。机组训练中心可以将短跑和跳跃测试与心血管监测结合起来,将学员分为高或低G耐受性组,以进一步个性化训练方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信