Generalizability of developmental EEG: Demographic reporting, representation, and sample size

IF 4.9 2区 医学 Q1 NEUROSCIENCES
Santiago Morales , Lauren Oh , Kylie Cox , Ramiro Rodriguez-Sanchez , Gina Nadaya , George A. Buzzell , Sonya V. Troller-Renfree
{"title":"Generalizability of developmental EEG: Demographic reporting, representation, and sample size","authors":"Santiago Morales ,&nbsp;Lauren Oh ,&nbsp;Kylie Cox ,&nbsp;Ramiro Rodriguez-Sanchez ,&nbsp;Gina Nadaya ,&nbsp;George A. Buzzell ,&nbsp;Sonya V. Troller-Renfree","doi":"10.1016/j.dcn.2025.101567","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Electroencephalography (EEG) is one of the main neuroscientific measures used with infants and children to identify potential biomarkers of cognitive and social developmental processes. Given the implications of developmental EEG research within policy, clinical, and educational domains, it is important to ensure that reported results are generalizable and reproducible. In this review, to provide an initial assessment of previous and current practices regarding participant recruitment (sample size and representation) and demographic reporting, we carried out a systematic review of six notable journals for publishing pediatric EEG studies between 2011 and 2023. We identified 700 articles reporting on pediatric EEG. We found that most studies did not provide complete reporting of basic demographic information (e.g., race, ethnicity, socioeconomic status, geographical location). This trend persisted across years of publication, suggesting continued underreporting. However, the reporting of demographic information differed between journals, suggesting solutions for improving reporting practices. Our review also indicated that samples were of modest sample size (Median = 51) and consisted of mostly White participants (78 %) from North America and Western Europe (85 %). Our discussion emphasizes the need for larger, more diverse samples and greater transparency in developmental EEG studies, while providing recommendations to address barriers to representation and reproducibility.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49083,"journal":{"name":"Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience","volume":"74 ","pages":"Article 101567"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1878929325000623","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Electroencephalography (EEG) is one of the main neuroscientific measures used with infants and children to identify potential biomarkers of cognitive and social developmental processes. Given the implications of developmental EEG research within policy, clinical, and educational domains, it is important to ensure that reported results are generalizable and reproducible. In this review, to provide an initial assessment of previous and current practices regarding participant recruitment (sample size and representation) and demographic reporting, we carried out a systematic review of six notable journals for publishing pediatric EEG studies between 2011 and 2023. We identified 700 articles reporting on pediatric EEG. We found that most studies did not provide complete reporting of basic demographic information (e.g., race, ethnicity, socioeconomic status, geographical location). This trend persisted across years of publication, suggesting continued underreporting. However, the reporting of demographic information differed between journals, suggesting solutions for improving reporting practices. Our review also indicated that samples were of modest sample size (Median = 51) and consisted of mostly White participants (78 %) from North America and Western Europe (85 %). Our discussion emphasizes the need for larger, more diverse samples and greater transparency in developmental EEG studies, while providing recommendations to address barriers to representation and reproducibility.
发展性脑电图的普遍性:人口统计报告、代表性和样本量
脑电图(EEG)是用于婴儿和儿童识别认知和社会发展过程的潜在生物标志物的主要神经科学措施之一。鉴于脑电图发育研究在政策、临床和教育领域的意义,确保报告的结果具有普遍性和可重复性是很重要的。在本综述中,为了对参与者招募(样本量和代表性)和人口统计报告的既往和当前实践进行初步评估,我们对2011年至2023年间发表儿科脑电图研究的6家知名期刊进行了系统综述。我们找到了700篇关于儿童脑电图的报道。我们发现大多数研究没有提供基本人口统计信息的完整报告(例如,种族、民族、社会经济地位、地理位置)。这一趋势持续了数年,表明持续的低报。然而,不同期刊对人口统计信息的报告存在差异,这为改进报告实践提出了解决方案。我们的回顾还表明,样本的样本量适中(中位数= 51),主要由来自北美和西欧的白人参与者(78 %)组成(85 %)。我们的讨论强调需要更大,更多样化的样本和更大的透明度在发育脑电图研究中,同时提供建议,以解决代表性和可重复性的障碍。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
10.60%
发文量
124
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The journal publishes theoretical and research papers on cognitive brain development, from infancy through childhood and adolescence and into adulthood. It covers neurocognitive development and neurocognitive processing in both typical and atypical development, including social and affective aspects. Appropriate methodologies for the journal include, but are not limited to, functional neuroimaging (fMRI and MEG), electrophysiology (EEG and ERP), NIRS and transcranial magnetic stimulation, as well as other basic neuroscience approaches using cellular and animal models that directly address cognitive brain development, patient studies, case studies, post-mortem studies and pharmacological studies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信