Energetic Parameters of Rowing Performance: Will the Distance Change in the 2028 Los Angeles Olympic Games Matter?

Alice Boillet,Laurent A Messonnier,Caroline Cohen
{"title":"Energetic Parameters of Rowing Performance: Will the Distance Change in the 2028 Los Angeles Olympic Games Matter?","authors":"Alice Boillet,Laurent A Messonnier,Caroline Cohen","doi":"10.1249/mss.0000000000003759","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"PURPOSE\r\nThe study aimed to model rowing in a single scull, considering individual physiological characteristics of rowers, to determine the optimal pacing strategy over 2000 m (current Olympic distance) and 1500 m (future Olympic distance for 2028), as well as the sensitivity of performance to specific physiological factors at these distances.\r\n\r\nMETHODS\r\nA validated mechanical model of rowing was coupled with an athlete-specific physiological model (digital twin) to determine optimal pacing strategies for two model athletes (a female and a male rower). Energy production was analyzed using both oxidative (O2,peak) and non-oxidative (Enon - ox) sources, using numerical and analytical approaches.\r\n\r\nRESULTS\r\nFor the 2000 m distance, the optimal pacing strategy involved a gradual deceleration over the first 1500 m, followed by a final sprint over the last 500 m, similar to current observed trends. For the 1500 m distance, the optimal pacing strategy lacked this final sprint. Reducing the distance increased the proportion of non-oxidative energy by 5%. Sensitivity of performance to O2,peak was consistent across both distances, showing a 1% performance gain for every 3% increase in O2,peak. In contrast, the sensitivity of Enon - ox increased as distance decreased (a 1% performance gain requiring an 11% increase for 2000 m vs. a 13% increase for 1500 m in non-oxidative capacity).\r\n\r\nCONCLUSIONS\r\nOptimal pacing strategies differ between 2000 m and 1500 m, with the latter requiring a less even pace with a faster start and without a final sprint. Sensitivity to O2,peak is consistently higher than that of Enon - ox at both distances, highlighting the critical role of oxidative capacity in rowing performance.","PeriodicalId":18500,"journal":{"name":"Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise","volume":"15 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1249/mss.0000000000003759","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

PURPOSE The study aimed to model rowing in a single scull, considering individual physiological characteristics of rowers, to determine the optimal pacing strategy over 2000 m (current Olympic distance) and 1500 m (future Olympic distance for 2028), as well as the sensitivity of performance to specific physiological factors at these distances. METHODS A validated mechanical model of rowing was coupled with an athlete-specific physiological model (digital twin) to determine optimal pacing strategies for two model athletes (a female and a male rower). Energy production was analyzed using both oxidative (O2,peak) and non-oxidative (Enon - ox) sources, using numerical and analytical approaches. RESULTS For the 2000 m distance, the optimal pacing strategy involved a gradual deceleration over the first 1500 m, followed by a final sprint over the last 500 m, similar to current observed trends. For the 1500 m distance, the optimal pacing strategy lacked this final sprint. Reducing the distance increased the proportion of non-oxidative energy by 5%. Sensitivity of performance to O2,peak was consistent across both distances, showing a 1% performance gain for every 3% increase in O2,peak. In contrast, the sensitivity of Enon - ox increased as distance decreased (a 1% performance gain requiring an 11% increase for 2000 m vs. a 13% increase for 1500 m in non-oxidative capacity). CONCLUSIONS Optimal pacing strategies differ between 2000 m and 1500 m, with the latter requiring a less even pace with a faster start and without a final sprint. Sensitivity to O2,peak is consistently higher than that of Enon - ox at both distances, highlighting the critical role of oxidative capacity in rowing performance.
赛艇性能的能量参数:2028年洛杉矶奥运会赛艇距离的变化会影响赛艇性能吗?
目的:本研究旨在模拟单桨赛艇,考虑赛艇运动员的个体生理特征,以确定在2000米(目前的奥运会距离)和1500米(2028年的未来奥运会距离)上的最佳配速策略,以及在这些距离上的表现对特定生理因素的敏感性。方法将经过验证的赛艇力学模型与运动员特异性生理模型(数字双胞胎)相结合,确定两名模型运动员(女性和男性赛艇运动员)的最佳起搏策略。利用数值和分析方法,对氧化(O2,峰值)和非氧化(Enon -ox)源的能量产生进行了分析。结果对于2000米,最佳起搏策略包括在前1500米逐渐减速,然后在最后500米冲刺,与目前观察到的趋势相似。对于1500米长跑,最佳的配速策略缺少最后的冲刺。减少距离使非氧化能量的比例增加了5%。性能对O2峰值的敏感性在两个距离上是一致的,O2峰值每增加3%,性能提高1%。相比之下,Enon -ox的灵敏度随着距离的减少而增加(1%的性能增益需要在2000 m时增加11%,而在1500 m时非氧化容量增加13%)。结论:最佳配速策略在2000米和1500米之间存在差异,1500米要求的配速不均匀,起跑更快,不需要最后冲刺。在两个距离上,对O2的敏感性峰值始终高于Enon - ox,突出了氧化能力在赛艇表现中的关键作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信