A novel model for predicting prognosis in patients with metastatic major salivary gland carcinoma.

IF 2.2 3区 医学 Q2 Dentistry
Shuyi Liu, Ziwen Wen, Haodong Li, Zhibao Geng, Shifeng Li, Xiaopeng Sun, Dan Bai, Yu Li
{"title":"A novel model for predicting prognosis in patients with metastatic major salivary gland carcinoma.","authors":"Shuyi Liu, Ziwen Wen, Haodong Li, Zhibao Geng, Shifeng Li, Xiaopeng Sun, Dan Bai, Yu Li","doi":"10.1016/j.jormas.2025.102412","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Patients with metastatic major salivary gland carcinoma (SGCs) always end with a poor prognosis, and survival time is a major concern for clinicians and patients, but effective predictive tools are lacking in clinical practice.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Clinical information on patients diagnosed with metastatic major SGCs was extracted from the SEER database. Cox analysis was applied to identify clinicopathological characteristics associated with patient overall survival (OS). A random survival forest (RSF) algorithm was used to establish an accurate prognostic prediction model for these patients.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Cox analysis revealed that age, T stage, N stage, pathology type, bone and liver metastasis, primary tumor surgery, chemotherapy, and radiotherapy were independent factors for OS among patients with metastatic major SGCs. Our RSF model has a C-index of 0.657 in the test set and 0.701 in the external validation set, and the area under the curve (AUC) values at 1, 3, and 5 years range from 0.715-0.802 in the test set and 0.655-0.918 in the external validation set. Patients were divided into high-risk and low-risk groups based on the risk score of the RSF model, and patients in the low-risk group had significantly better OS than those in the high-risk group, and chemotherapy did not benefit patients in the low-risk group.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In this study, a prognostic prediction model was constructed for patients with metastatic major SGCs using RSF algorithm, and the validation results indicate that the model has the potential to be a useful tool for clinicians in predicting survival and designing individualized treatment.</p>","PeriodicalId":56038,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Stomatology Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery","volume":" ","pages":"102412"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Stomatology Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jormas.2025.102412","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Dentistry","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Patients with metastatic major salivary gland carcinoma (SGCs) always end with a poor prognosis, and survival time is a major concern for clinicians and patients, but effective predictive tools are lacking in clinical practice.

Methods: Clinical information on patients diagnosed with metastatic major SGCs was extracted from the SEER database. Cox analysis was applied to identify clinicopathological characteristics associated with patient overall survival (OS). A random survival forest (RSF) algorithm was used to establish an accurate prognostic prediction model for these patients.

Results: Cox analysis revealed that age, T stage, N stage, pathology type, bone and liver metastasis, primary tumor surgery, chemotherapy, and radiotherapy were independent factors for OS among patients with metastatic major SGCs. Our RSF model has a C-index of 0.657 in the test set and 0.701 in the external validation set, and the area under the curve (AUC) values at 1, 3, and 5 years range from 0.715-0.802 in the test set and 0.655-0.918 in the external validation set. Patients were divided into high-risk and low-risk groups based on the risk score of the RSF model, and patients in the low-risk group had significantly better OS than those in the high-risk group, and chemotherapy did not benefit patients in the low-risk group.

Conclusion: In this study, a prognostic prediction model was constructed for patients with metastatic major SGCs using RSF algorithm, and the validation results indicate that the model has the potential to be a useful tool for clinicians in predicting survival and designing individualized treatment.

一种预测转移性大涎腺癌患者预后的新模型。
背景:转移性大涎腺癌(SGCs)患者预后往往较差,生存时间是临床医生和患者关注的主要问题,但临床实践中缺乏有效的预测工具。方法:从SEER数据库中提取诊断为转移性主要SGCs的患者的临床信息。应用Cox分析确定与患者总生存期(OS)相关的临床病理特征。采用随机生存森林(RSF)算法建立准确的患者预后预测模型。结果:Cox分析显示,年龄、T分期、N分期、病理类型、骨和肝转移、原发肿瘤手术、化疗和放疗是转移性主要SGCs患者OS的独立影响因素。我们的RSF模型在测试集中的c指数为0.657,在外部验证集中的c指数为0.701,在1、3和5年的曲线下面积(AUC)值在测试集中为0.715-0.802,在外部验证集中为0.655-0.918。根据RSF模型的风险评分将患者分为高危组和低危组,低危组患者的OS明显优于高危组,低危组患者化疗无获益。结论:本研究利用RSF算法构建了转移性大SGCs患者的预后预测模型,验证结果表明该模型有可能成为临床医生预测生存和设计个体化治疗方案的有用工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
9.10%
发文量
305
期刊介绍: J Stomatol Oral Maxillofac Surg publishes research papers and techniques - (guest) editorials, original articles, reviews, technical notes, case reports, images, letters to the editor, guidelines - dedicated to enhancing surgical expertise in all fields relevant to oral and maxillofacial surgery: from plastic and reconstructive surgery of the face, oral surgery and medicine, … to dentofacial and maxillofacial orthopedics. Original articles include clinical or laboratory investigations and clinical or equipment reports. Reviews include narrative reviews, systematic reviews and meta-analyses. All manuscripts submitted to the journal are subjected to peer review by international experts, and must: Be written in excellent English, clear and easy to understand, precise and concise; Bring new, interesting, valid information - and improve clinical care or guide future research; Be solely the work of the author(s) stated; Not have been previously published elsewhere and not be under consideration by another journal; Be in accordance with the journal''s Guide for Authors'' instructions: manuscripts that fail to comply with these rules may be returned to the authors without being reviewed. Under no circumstances does the journal guarantee publication before the editorial board makes its final decision. The journal is indexed in the main international databases and is accessible worldwide through the ScienceDirect and ClinicalKey Platforms.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信