Shuyi Liu, Ziwen Wen, Haodong Li, Zhibao Geng, Shifeng Li, Xiaopeng Sun, Dan Bai, Yu Li
{"title":"A novel model for predicting prognosis in patients with metastatic major salivary gland carcinoma.","authors":"Shuyi Liu, Ziwen Wen, Haodong Li, Zhibao Geng, Shifeng Li, Xiaopeng Sun, Dan Bai, Yu Li","doi":"10.1016/j.jormas.2025.102412","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Patients with metastatic major salivary gland carcinoma (SGCs) always end with a poor prognosis, and survival time is a major concern for clinicians and patients, but effective predictive tools are lacking in clinical practice.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Clinical information on patients diagnosed with metastatic major SGCs was extracted from the SEER database. Cox analysis was applied to identify clinicopathological characteristics associated with patient overall survival (OS). A random survival forest (RSF) algorithm was used to establish an accurate prognostic prediction model for these patients.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Cox analysis revealed that age, T stage, N stage, pathology type, bone and liver metastasis, primary tumor surgery, chemotherapy, and radiotherapy were independent factors for OS among patients with metastatic major SGCs. Our RSF model has a C-index of 0.657 in the test set and 0.701 in the external validation set, and the area under the curve (AUC) values at 1, 3, and 5 years range from 0.715-0.802 in the test set and 0.655-0.918 in the external validation set. Patients were divided into high-risk and low-risk groups based on the risk score of the RSF model, and patients in the low-risk group had significantly better OS than those in the high-risk group, and chemotherapy did not benefit patients in the low-risk group.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In this study, a prognostic prediction model was constructed for patients with metastatic major SGCs using RSF algorithm, and the validation results indicate that the model has the potential to be a useful tool for clinicians in predicting survival and designing individualized treatment.</p>","PeriodicalId":56038,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Stomatology Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery","volume":" ","pages":"102412"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Stomatology Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jormas.2025.102412","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Dentistry","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Patients with metastatic major salivary gland carcinoma (SGCs) always end with a poor prognosis, and survival time is a major concern for clinicians and patients, but effective predictive tools are lacking in clinical practice.
Methods: Clinical information on patients diagnosed with metastatic major SGCs was extracted from the SEER database. Cox analysis was applied to identify clinicopathological characteristics associated with patient overall survival (OS). A random survival forest (RSF) algorithm was used to establish an accurate prognostic prediction model for these patients.
Results: Cox analysis revealed that age, T stage, N stage, pathology type, bone and liver metastasis, primary tumor surgery, chemotherapy, and radiotherapy were independent factors for OS among patients with metastatic major SGCs. Our RSF model has a C-index of 0.657 in the test set and 0.701 in the external validation set, and the area under the curve (AUC) values at 1, 3, and 5 years range from 0.715-0.802 in the test set and 0.655-0.918 in the external validation set. Patients were divided into high-risk and low-risk groups based on the risk score of the RSF model, and patients in the low-risk group had significantly better OS than those in the high-risk group, and chemotherapy did not benefit patients in the low-risk group.
Conclusion: In this study, a prognostic prediction model was constructed for patients with metastatic major SGCs using RSF algorithm, and the validation results indicate that the model has the potential to be a useful tool for clinicians in predicting survival and designing individualized treatment.
期刊介绍:
J Stomatol Oral Maxillofac Surg publishes research papers and techniques - (guest) editorials, original articles, reviews, technical notes, case reports, images, letters to the editor, guidelines - dedicated to enhancing surgical expertise in all fields relevant to oral and maxillofacial surgery: from plastic and reconstructive surgery of the face, oral surgery and medicine, … to dentofacial and maxillofacial orthopedics.
Original articles include clinical or laboratory investigations and clinical or equipment reports. Reviews include narrative reviews, systematic reviews and meta-analyses.
All manuscripts submitted to the journal are subjected to peer review by international experts, and must:
Be written in excellent English, clear and easy to understand, precise and concise;
Bring new, interesting, valid information - and improve clinical care or guide future research;
Be solely the work of the author(s) stated;
Not have been previously published elsewhere and not be under consideration by another journal;
Be in accordance with the journal''s Guide for Authors'' instructions: manuscripts that fail to comply with these rules may be returned to the authors without being reviewed.
Under no circumstances does the journal guarantee publication before the editorial board makes its final decision.
The journal is indexed in the main international databases and is accessible worldwide through the ScienceDirect and ClinicalKey Platforms.