The Impact of Later-Life Learning on Trajectories of Cognitive Function Among U.S. Older Adults.

IF 4.9 3区 医学 Q1 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY
Innovation in Aging Pub Date : 2025-02-27 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1093/geroni/igaf023
Nan Wang, Hanzhang Xu, Radha Dhingra, Ying Xian, Eleanor S McConnell, Bei Wu, Matthew E Dupre
{"title":"The Impact of Later-Life Learning on Trajectories of Cognitive Function Among U.S. Older Adults.","authors":"Nan Wang, Hanzhang Xu, Radha Dhingra, Ying Xian, Eleanor S McConnell, Bei Wu, Matthew E Dupre","doi":"10.1093/geroni/igaf023","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>Low education in early life is a major risk factor for dementia. However, little is known about how education in later life is related to cognitive function in older adults. We assessed whether later-life learning was associated with better cognitive function over time and whether the associations differed by sex, race/ethnicity, and prior education.</p><p><strong>Research design and methods: </strong>We used data from the 2008-2018 Health and Retirement Study, including participants aged 65+ without baseline dementia and followed for up to 6 years. Global cognition was measured using a summary score. Later-life learning was measured at every wave at least once a month or more, not in the last month, or never.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 12 099 participants, 10.2% attended an educational or training course \"at least once a month or more,\" 45.5% reported \"not in the last month,\" and 43.3% reported \"never\" at each wave of the study. Results from adjusted mixed-effects models showed that engaging in any later-life learning, either at least once a month (0.56 points higher, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.40-0.73) or not in the last month (0.55 points higher, 95% CI = 0.45-0.65) was associated with better cognitive function compared to never engaging in these activities. The association remained consistent as people aged. The benefits of later-life learning on cognitive function were greater in women than in men-at least once a month versus never was 0.30 points greater in women than men (95% CI = -0.03 to 0.63, <i>p</i> = .0760); not in the last month versus never was 0.24 points greater in women than men (95% CI = 0.04-0.43, <i>p</i> = .016). There were no significant differences by race/ethnicity or prior education.</p><p><strong>Discussion and implications: </strong>Later-life learning was associated with better cognitive function over time. These findings underscore the importance of continued learning among older adults.</p>","PeriodicalId":13596,"journal":{"name":"Innovation in Aging","volume":"9 5","pages":"igaf023"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12082096/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Innovation in Aging","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/geroni/igaf023","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and objectives: Low education in early life is a major risk factor for dementia. However, little is known about how education in later life is related to cognitive function in older adults. We assessed whether later-life learning was associated with better cognitive function over time and whether the associations differed by sex, race/ethnicity, and prior education.

Research design and methods: We used data from the 2008-2018 Health and Retirement Study, including participants aged 65+ without baseline dementia and followed for up to 6 years. Global cognition was measured using a summary score. Later-life learning was measured at every wave at least once a month or more, not in the last month, or never.

Results: Of 12 099 participants, 10.2% attended an educational or training course "at least once a month or more," 45.5% reported "not in the last month," and 43.3% reported "never" at each wave of the study. Results from adjusted mixed-effects models showed that engaging in any later-life learning, either at least once a month (0.56 points higher, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.40-0.73) or not in the last month (0.55 points higher, 95% CI = 0.45-0.65) was associated with better cognitive function compared to never engaging in these activities. The association remained consistent as people aged. The benefits of later-life learning on cognitive function were greater in women than in men-at least once a month versus never was 0.30 points greater in women than men (95% CI = -0.03 to 0.63, p = .0760); not in the last month versus never was 0.24 points greater in women than men (95% CI = 0.04-0.43, p = .016). There were no significant differences by race/ethnicity or prior education.

Discussion and implications: Later-life learning was associated with better cognitive function over time. These findings underscore the importance of continued learning among older adults.

晚年学习对美国老年人认知功能轨迹的影响。
背景和目的:早期教育程度低是痴呆的主要危险因素。然而,人们对晚年教育与老年人认知功能的关系知之甚少。我们评估了随着时间的推移,晚年学习是否与更好的认知功能有关,以及这种联系是否因性别、种族/民族和先前教育而异。研究设计和方法:我们使用了2008-2018年健康与退休研究的数据,包括65岁以上无基线痴呆的参与者,随访时间长达6年。整体认知是用总结性评分来衡量的。晚年学习是在每个波中至少一个月或更多次进行测量,而不是在最后一个月,或者从来没有。结果:在12099名参与者中,10.2%的人“每月至少参加一次或更多”的教育或培训课程,45.5%的人报告“上个月没有”,43.3%的人报告“从未”在研究的每个阶段。调整后的混合效应模型的结果显示,与从未参加过这些活动相比,参加任何晚年学习活动,无论是每月至少一次(0.56点,95%置信区间[CI] = 0.40-0.73),还是上个月不参加(0.55点,95% CI = 0.45-0.65),都与更好的认知功能相关。随着人们年龄的增长,这种联系一直保持不变。晚年学习对认知功能的益处女性大于男性——每月至少一次与从不学习相比,女性比男性高0.30个百分点(95% CI = -0.03至0.63,p = .0760);女性上个月没有比男性从未高0.24个点(95% CI = 0.04-0.43, p = 0.016)。种族/民族或先前教育没有显著差异。讨论和启示:随着时间的推移,晚年学习与更好的认知功能有关。这些发现强调了老年人继续学习的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Innovation in Aging
Innovation in Aging GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY-
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
72
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊介绍: Innovation in Aging, an interdisciplinary Open Access journal of the Gerontological Society of America (GSA), is dedicated to publishing innovative, conceptually robust, and methodologically rigorous research focused on aging and the life course. The journal aims to present studies with the potential to significantly enhance the health, functionality, and overall well-being of older adults by translating scientific insights into practical applications. Research published in the journal spans a variety of settings, including community, clinical, and laboratory contexts, with a clear emphasis on issues that are directly pertinent to aging and the dynamics of life over time. The content of the journal mirrors the diverse research interests of GSA members and encompasses a range of study types. These include the validation of new conceptual or theoretical models, assessments of factors impacting the health and well-being of older adults, evaluations of interventions and policies, the implementation of groundbreaking research methodologies, interdisciplinary research that adapts concepts and methods from other fields to aging studies, and the use of modeling and simulations to understand factors and processes influencing aging outcomes. The journal welcomes contributions from scholars across various disciplines, such as technology, engineering, architecture, economics, business, law, political science, public policy, education, public health, social and psychological sciences, biomedical and health sciences, and the humanities and arts, reflecting a holistic approach to advancing knowledge in gerontology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信