Aniek van Herwaarden, Nienke C Peters-Scheffer, Vaso Totsika, Robert Didden
{"title":"A qualitative process evaluation of Active Support in the Dutch context: An investigation of implementation and contextual factors.","authors":"Aniek van Herwaarden, Nienke C Peters-Scheffer, Vaso Totsika, Robert Didden","doi":"10.3109/13668250.2025.2503101","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>A qualitative process evaluation was carried out to investigate implementation of Active Support in services for people with mild and moderate intellectual disability in the Netherlands, and to identify contextual factors that may contribute to variation in implementation, perceived effectiveness, and pathways to successful outcomes.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Qualitative semi-structured interviews were conducted with stakeholders who were involved with the Active Support implementation. Interviews with practice leaders (<i>n</i> = 6), Active Support trainers (<i>n</i> = 4), direct support staff (<i>n</i> = 8), and residents with mild intellectual disabilities (<i>n</i> = 7) were analysed through a thematic analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Organisational and managerial preparation appeared to lead to positive Active Support training experiences, in turn leading to behavioural changes in staff, resulting in resident wellbeing. Practice leaders' coaching, staff collaboration, and additional staffing resources through volunteers and students facilitated implementation of Active Support.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Identification of these factors enhances our understanding of the dynamic process of Active Support implementation in a Dutch context.</p>","PeriodicalId":51466,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Intellectual & Developmental Disability","volume":" ","pages":"1-11"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Intellectual & Developmental Disability","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3109/13668250.2025.2503101","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SPECIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: A qualitative process evaluation was carried out to investigate implementation of Active Support in services for people with mild and moderate intellectual disability in the Netherlands, and to identify contextual factors that may contribute to variation in implementation, perceived effectiveness, and pathways to successful outcomes.
Method: Qualitative semi-structured interviews were conducted with stakeholders who were involved with the Active Support implementation. Interviews with practice leaders (n = 6), Active Support trainers (n = 4), direct support staff (n = 8), and residents with mild intellectual disabilities (n = 7) were analysed through a thematic analysis.
Results: Organisational and managerial preparation appeared to lead to positive Active Support training experiences, in turn leading to behavioural changes in staff, resulting in resident wellbeing. Practice leaders' coaching, staff collaboration, and additional staffing resources through volunteers and students facilitated implementation of Active Support.
Conclusions: Identification of these factors enhances our understanding of the dynamic process of Active Support implementation in a Dutch context.
期刊介绍:
Journal of Intellectual & Developmental Disability (formerly the Australia and New Zealand Journal of Developmental Disabilities) is the official journal of the Australasian Society for the Study of Intellectual Disability (ASSID). JIDD is an international, multidisciplinary journal in the field of intellectual and developmental disability. The journal publishes original qualitative and quantitative research papers, literature reviews, conceptual articles, brief reports, case reports, data briefs, and opinions and perspectives.