Crafting effective health appeals: Language and source credibility in amplifying tobacco control messages on social media.

Q3 Health Professions
Dhruven R Zala, Athi Karthick V, Arun Sreekumar
{"title":"Crafting effective health appeals: Language and source credibility in amplifying tobacco control messages on social media.","authors":"Dhruven R Zala, Athi Karthick V, Arun Sreekumar","doi":"10.1080/07359683.2025.2504813","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Amplification of informational social media posts are crucial for disseminating tobacco control messages as part of an integrated behavior change strategy. Our study explores the amplification effectiveness of fear-based, trust-based, and linguistically complex framing for tobacco control appeals from credible sources and in general. Analyzing 42,261 tweets from 102 accounts using natural language processing techniques, we found fear-based (38.75%) and complex appeals (31.53%) increased retweets, while trust-based decreased them (-37.28%). Credible sources amplified trust-based (58.98%) and fear-based (69.58%) appeals but reduced the amplification of complex messages (-11.01%). Consequently, we highlight the need for strategic framing of tobacco control messages for greater impact.</p>","PeriodicalId":36008,"journal":{"name":"Health Marketing Quarterly","volume":" ","pages":"1-25"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Marketing Quarterly","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/07359683.2025.2504813","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Health Professions","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Amplification of informational social media posts are crucial for disseminating tobacco control messages as part of an integrated behavior change strategy. Our study explores the amplification effectiveness of fear-based, trust-based, and linguistically complex framing for tobacco control appeals from credible sources and in general. Analyzing 42,261 tweets from 102 accounts using natural language processing techniques, we found fear-based (38.75%) and complex appeals (31.53%) increased retweets, while trust-based decreased them (-37.28%). Credible sources amplified trust-based (58.98%) and fear-based (69.58%) appeals but reduced the amplification of complex messages (-11.01%). Consequently, we highlight the need for strategic framing of tobacco control messages for greater impact.

制作有效的健康呼吁:在社交媒体上放大烟草控制信息的语言和来源可信度。
作为综合行为改变战略的一部分,放大社交媒体上的信息帖子对于传播烟草控制信息至关重要。我们的研究探讨了基于恐惧、基于信任和语言复杂的框架对来自可靠来源和一般情况下的烟草控制呼吁的放大效果。我们使用自然语言处理技术分析了来自102个账户的42,261条推文,发现基于恐惧(38.75%)和复杂诉求(31.53%)的推文增加了转发量,而基于信任的推文减少了转发量(-37.28%)。可信来源放大了基于信任的诉求(58.98%)和基于恐惧的诉求(69.58%),但减少了复杂信息的放大(-11.01%)。因此,我们强调需要对烟草控制信息进行战略性框架,以产生更大的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Health Marketing Quarterly
Health Marketing Quarterly Health Professions-Health Professions (all)
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
17
期刊介绍: Health Marketing Quarterly is directed at academicians and practitioners who are concerned with the concepts, practice, and research of health care marketing in today"s complex environment. The journal addresses important contemporary issues in the use of marketing by health care organizations like hospitals, individual practitioners, and public health care organizations. This includes the use of marketing to promote, position, deter, enhance health care organizations/issues, and the development of the marketing literature on both a conceptual and empirical basis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信