A Confidence-Based Shared Control Strategy for Robotic Electrosurgery

IF 3.8 Q2 ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL
A. Meza-Pantoja;A. C. Lawson;C. C. Caputo;J. Ge;D. J. Cohen;A. Krieger;H. Saeidi
{"title":"A Confidence-Based Shared Control Strategy for Robotic Electrosurgery","authors":"A. Meza-Pantoja;A. C. Lawson;C. C. Caputo;J. Ge;D. J. Cohen;A. Krieger;H. Saeidi","doi":"10.1109/TMRB.2025.3560400","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Robotic-assisted surgery (RAS) systems take advantage of dexterous tools, enhanced vision, and motion filtering to improve patient outcomes. Whereas most RAS systems are directly controlled by surgeons, the development and application of autonomous RAS are growing owing to their repeatability and precision. Although full autonomy is a long-term goal, human intervention in RAS is still essential. In this work, we develop and test a shared control strategy for robotic electrosurgery in which autonomous robot controllers and human operators collaborate. We designed and implemented identification tests that assessed the effectiveness of autonomous and manual control strategies and the cost of switching between the control modes. Based on the results, we propose a control mode switching strategy and examine it via an experiment on precision cutting on porcine tongue samples. The results indicate that by combining the best elements of autonomous and manual control, we can achieve more accurate soft-tissue incisions as compared to single-mode control strategies. Furthermore, the proposed strategy reduces the required human-in-the-loop time by 69.29%.","PeriodicalId":73318,"journal":{"name":"IEEE transactions on medical robotics and bionics","volume":"7 2","pages":"583-594"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IEEE transactions on medical robotics and bionics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/10964360/","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Robotic-assisted surgery (RAS) systems take advantage of dexterous tools, enhanced vision, and motion filtering to improve patient outcomes. Whereas most RAS systems are directly controlled by surgeons, the development and application of autonomous RAS are growing owing to their repeatability and precision. Although full autonomy is a long-term goal, human intervention in RAS is still essential. In this work, we develop and test a shared control strategy for robotic electrosurgery in which autonomous robot controllers and human operators collaborate. We designed and implemented identification tests that assessed the effectiveness of autonomous and manual control strategies and the cost of switching between the control modes. Based on the results, we propose a control mode switching strategy and examine it via an experiment on precision cutting on porcine tongue samples. The results indicate that by combining the best elements of autonomous and manual control, we can achieve more accurate soft-tissue incisions as compared to single-mode control strategies. Furthermore, the proposed strategy reduces the required human-in-the-loop time by 69.29%.
基于置信度的机器人电手术共享控制策略
机器人辅助手术(RAS)系统利用灵巧的工具、增强的视觉和运动过滤来改善患者的治疗效果。虽然大多数RAS系统是由外科医生直接控制的,但由于其可重复性和精度,自主RAS的开发和应用正在增长。虽然完全自主是一个长期目标,但人工干预仍然是必不可少的。在这项工作中,我们开发并测试了机器人电手术的共享控制策略,其中自主机器人控制器和人类操作员协作。我们设计并实施了识别测试,以评估自主和手动控制策略的有效性以及在控制模式之间切换的成本。在此基础上,提出了一种控制模式切换策略,并通过猪舌样品的精密切割实验对其进行了验证。结果表明,与单模控制策略相比,通过结合自主和手动控制的最佳元素,我们可以实现更精确的软组织切口。此外,该策略将所需的人在环时间缩短了69.29%。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信