From Selection to Influence: The Moderating Role of Classroom Norms in the Evolution of Aggression and Victimization in Adolescent Friendship Networks.

IF 3.7 1区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL
Ruonan Guo, Ke Hou, Tian Li, Caina Li
{"title":"From Selection to Influence: The Moderating Role of Classroom Norms in the Evolution of Aggression and Victimization in Adolescent Friendship Networks.","authors":"Ruonan Guo, Ke Hou, Tian Li, Caina Li","doi":"10.1007/s10964-025-02198-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Aggression and victimization are well-documented factors influencing adolescent social relationships, yet little is known about how these behaviors interact with friendship networks, particularly in the context of aggression norms. This study explored the relationships between aggression, victimization, and friendship networks, and further examined the moderating role of two types of aggression norms among Chinese adolescents using longitudinal social network analysis. A sample of 879 students (M<sub>age</sub> = 12.73 years, SD = 0.43; 42.09% girls) from 16 classes (M<sub>class size</sub> = 54.94, SD = 2.64) was tracked across three waves of surveys with 1-year intervals. The results revealed that adolescents did not select friends based on similarities in aggression or victimization, yet interactions with friends influenced individuals' levels of aggression or victimization. Popularity norms for aggression were negative in all classes, and both friendship selection and influence effects related to aggression were non-significant in all three groups. Although certain victimization-related effects were significant in specific groups, the overall moderating role of negative popularity norms was not significant. Descriptive norms for aggression did not moderate any of these processes. These findings help understand the dynamics relationship of aggression (and victimization) and friendship networks among Chinese middle adolescents, highlighting the potential role of establishing negative aggression popularity norms as potential strategies to curb the spread of aggression.</p>","PeriodicalId":17624,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Youth and Adolescence","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Youth and Adolescence","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-025-02198-5","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aggression and victimization are well-documented factors influencing adolescent social relationships, yet little is known about how these behaviors interact with friendship networks, particularly in the context of aggression norms. This study explored the relationships between aggression, victimization, and friendship networks, and further examined the moderating role of two types of aggression norms among Chinese adolescents using longitudinal social network analysis. A sample of 879 students (Mage = 12.73 years, SD = 0.43; 42.09% girls) from 16 classes (Mclass size = 54.94, SD = 2.64) was tracked across three waves of surveys with 1-year intervals. The results revealed that adolescents did not select friends based on similarities in aggression or victimization, yet interactions with friends influenced individuals' levels of aggression or victimization. Popularity norms for aggression were negative in all classes, and both friendship selection and influence effects related to aggression were non-significant in all three groups. Although certain victimization-related effects were significant in specific groups, the overall moderating role of negative popularity norms was not significant. Descriptive norms for aggression did not moderate any of these processes. These findings help understand the dynamics relationship of aggression (and victimization) and friendship networks among Chinese middle adolescents, highlighting the potential role of establishing negative aggression popularity norms as potential strategies to curb the spread of aggression.

从选择到影响:课堂规范对青少年友谊网络中攻击和伤害演化的调节作用。
攻击和受害是影响青少年社会关系的充分证据,但很少有人知道这些行为如何与友谊网络相互作用,特别是在攻击规范的背景下。本研究探讨了攻击、受害和友谊网络之间的关系,并利用纵向社会网络分析进一步考察了两种攻击规范对中国青少年攻击行为的调节作用。样本为879名学生(Mage = 12.73 years, SD = 0.43;来自16个班级(Mclass size = 54.94, SD = 2.64)的42.09%的女生)进行了三次调查,每隔1年进行一次。结果显示,青少年并不会根据攻击或受害的相似性来选择朋友,但与朋友的互动会影响个人的攻击或受害水平。在所有班级中,受欢迎程度对攻击行为的规范都是负的,在所有三组中,与攻击行为相关的友谊选择和影响效应都不显著。虽然某些受害相关效应在特定群体中显着,但负面人气规范的总体调节作用并不显着。攻击性的描述性规范并没有缓和这些过程。这些发现有助于理解中国青少年攻击(和受害)与友谊网络的动态关系,强调了建立消极攻击受欢迎程度规范作为抑制攻击传播的潜在策略的潜在作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Youth and Adolescence
Journal of Youth and Adolescence PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL-
CiteScore
8.20
自引率
6.10%
发文量
155
期刊介绍: Journal of Youth and Adolescence provides a single, high-level medium of communication for psychologists, psychiatrists, biologists, criminologists, educators, and researchers in many other allied disciplines who address the subject of youth and adolescence. The journal publishes quantitative analyses, theoretical papers, and comprehensive review articles. The journal especially welcomes empirically rigorous papers that take policy implications seriously. Research need not have been designed to address policy needs, but manuscripts must address implications for the manner society formally (e.g., through laws, policies or regulations) or informally (e.g., through parents, peers, and social institutions) responds to the period of youth and adolescence.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信