Biological responses to biomaterials: a review.

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q2 BIOLOGY
Y V R Gomes, A A Tavares, R C Barbosa, A F Tomaz, W J B Sousa, L C C Oliveira, S M L Silva, M V L Fook
{"title":"Biological responses to biomaterials: a review.","authors":"Y V R Gomes, A A Tavares, R C Barbosa, A F Tomaz, W J B Sousa, L C C Oliveira, S M L Silva, M V L Fook","doi":"10.1590/1414-431X2025e14599","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Biomaterials stimulate diverse biological responses, including inflammation, wound healing, foreign body reactions, and fibrous encapsulation, all critical for evaluating biocompatibility and effectiveness. These responses are influenced by the material's physicochemical and biological properties, such as composition, texture, and surface characteristics. Adverse reactions, such as severe inflammation or fibrous encapsulation, can hinder tissue integration, jeopardizing patient health and increasing healthcare costs. This review aimed to summarize the current scientific evidence on biological responses to biomaterials. A systematic search was conducted through multiple databases (VHL, PubMed, SCOPUS, EMBASE, and Web of Science) including in vitro and in vivo studies that compared biomaterial interactions with the natural immune response (innate and adaptive). From the 791 articles identified, 25 met strict inclusion criteria. These studies revealed variations in immune responses and material surface characteristics, highlighting advancements made to enhance tissue integration. Bioactive materials demonstrated greater potential for tissue regeneration, while inert materials triggered moderate inflammatory reactions. This variability emphasizes the need for a personalized biomaterial selection, considering both short-term biocompatibility and long-term tissue functionality. This review underscores the importance of comprehensive evaluation to optimize biomaterial performance in clinical applications.</p>","PeriodicalId":9088,"journal":{"name":"Brazilian Journal of Medical and Biological Research","volume":"58 ","pages":"e14599"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12068782/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Brazilian Journal of Medical and Biological Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1590/1414-431X2025e14599","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Biomaterials stimulate diverse biological responses, including inflammation, wound healing, foreign body reactions, and fibrous encapsulation, all critical for evaluating biocompatibility and effectiveness. These responses are influenced by the material's physicochemical and biological properties, such as composition, texture, and surface characteristics. Adverse reactions, such as severe inflammation or fibrous encapsulation, can hinder tissue integration, jeopardizing patient health and increasing healthcare costs. This review aimed to summarize the current scientific evidence on biological responses to biomaterials. A systematic search was conducted through multiple databases (VHL, PubMed, SCOPUS, EMBASE, and Web of Science) including in vitro and in vivo studies that compared biomaterial interactions with the natural immune response (innate and adaptive). From the 791 articles identified, 25 met strict inclusion criteria. These studies revealed variations in immune responses and material surface characteristics, highlighting advancements made to enhance tissue integration. Bioactive materials demonstrated greater potential for tissue regeneration, while inert materials triggered moderate inflammatory reactions. This variability emphasizes the need for a personalized biomaterial selection, considering both short-term biocompatibility and long-term tissue functionality. This review underscores the importance of comprehensive evaluation to optimize biomaterial performance in clinical applications.

生物材料的生物学反应综述。
生物材料刺激多种生物反应,包括炎症、伤口愈合、异物反应和纤维包封,这些都是评估生物相容性和有效性的关键。这些反应受到材料的物理化学和生物特性的影响,如成分、质地和表面特性。不良反应,如严重炎症或纤维包封,会阻碍组织整合,危害患者健康并增加医疗成本。本文综述了目前有关生物材料生物反应的科学证据。通过多个数据库(VHL、PubMed、SCOPUS、EMBASE和Web of Science)进行了系统搜索,包括比较生物材料相互作用与自然免疫反应(先天和适应性)的体外和体内研究。在确定的791篇文章中,有25篇符合严格的纳入标准。这些研究揭示了免疫反应和材料表面特性的变化,突出了在增强组织整合方面取得的进展。生物活性材料显示出更大的组织再生潜力,而惰性材料则引发中度炎症反应。这种可变性强调了个性化生物材料选择的必要性,同时考虑到短期生物相容性和长期组织功能。这篇综述强调了综合评价对优化临床应用中生物材料性能的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
129
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: The Brazilian Journal of Medical and Biological Research, founded by Michel Jamra, is edited and published monthly by the Associação Brasileira de Divulgação Científica (ABDC), a federation of Brazilian scientific societies: - Sociedade Brasileira de Biofísica (SBBf) - Sociedade Brasileira de Farmacologia e Terapêutica Experimental (SBFTE) - Sociedade Brasileira de Fisiologia (SBFis) - Sociedade Brasileira de Imunologia (SBI) - Sociedade Brasileira de Investigação Clínica (SBIC) - Sociedade Brasileira de Neurociências e Comportamento (SBNeC).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信