{"title":"How to promote playful study design, study engagement and creativity in higher Education: The role of study and personal resources","authors":"Maike Liu , Xiayu Tong , Jun Qi , Wenjun Cai","doi":"10.1016/j.ijme.2025.101196","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Although the importance of playful study design for fostering students' study engagement and creativity has been recognized, empirical research on its antecedents and consequences remains limited. Drawing upon proactive motivation theory, this study develops an integrative model to examine the factors influencing students' playful study design and its consequences within higher education. Participants were 213 students from a university in China, school of management, who filled out two questionnaires administered with one month in between. As hypothesized, the results showed that autonomy support, as a study resource, provided “reason to” motivation for playful study design, while psychological capital, as a personal resource, offered “can do” motivation. Both factors significantly promoted designing fun and designing competition. Furthermore, “can do” motivation enhances the effect of “reason to” motivation in such a way that students with high autonomy support and high psychological capital acted most often in playful study design. In turn, designing fun directly and indirectly fostered students’ self-perceived creativity by enhancing study engagement. These findings contribute novel insights into how to promote playful study design, study engagement, and self-perceived creativity and offer practical implications for optimizing the study environment in higher education.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":47191,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Management Education","volume":"23 3","pages":"Article 101196"},"PeriodicalIF":6.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Management Education","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1472811725000667","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Although the importance of playful study design for fostering students' study engagement and creativity has been recognized, empirical research on its antecedents and consequences remains limited. Drawing upon proactive motivation theory, this study develops an integrative model to examine the factors influencing students' playful study design and its consequences within higher education. Participants were 213 students from a university in China, school of management, who filled out two questionnaires administered with one month in between. As hypothesized, the results showed that autonomy support, as a study resource, provided “reason to” motivation for playful study design, while psychological capital, as a personal resource, offered “can do” motivation. Both factors significantly promoted designing fun and designing competition. Furthermore, “can do” motivation enhances the effect of “reason to” motivation in such a way that students with high autonomy support and high psychological capital acted most often in playful study design. In turn, designing fun directly and indirectly fostered students’ self-perceived creativity by enhancing study engagement. These findings contribute novel insights into how to promote playful study design, study engagement, and self-perceived creativity and offer practical implications for optimizing the study environment in higher education.
期刊介绍:
The International Journal of Management Education provides a forum for scholarly reporting and discussion of developments in all aspects of teaching and learning in business and management. The Journal seeks reflective papers which bring together pedagogy and theories of management learning; descriptions of innovative teaching which include critical reflection on implementation and outcomes will also be considered.