Effect of cooking and food serving robot design images and information on consumer liking, willingness to try food, and emotional responses

IF 7 1区 农林科学 Q1 FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
Cho-Long Lee , Han Sub Kwak
{"title":"Effect of cooking and food serving robot design images and information on consumer liking, willingness to try food, and emotional responses","authors":"Cho-Long Lee ,&nbsp;Han Sub Kwak","doi":"10.1016/j.foodres.2025.116626","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The utilization of robots in the food industry, including restaurants and cafés, has increased in recent years. This study investigated participants' responses to robots in the serving and cooking domains, which require varying degrees of consumer interactions. This study examined expected liking and willingness to try food prepared or served by robots at three levels of anthropomorphism, along with associated emotional responses. Participants were divided into a group that received positive information about robot (<em>n</em> = 845) and a control group (<em>n</em> = 870). Compared to the control group, the informed group showed significantly higher ratings for the expected liking (<em>p</em> &lt; 0.05) and willingness to try (<em>p</em> &lt; 0.05) food from cooking robots. For serving robots, only willingness to try (<em>p</em> &lt; 0.05) was higher in the informed group. The informed group also demonstrated more positive emotions (adventurous, secure, curious, daring, interested, and trusting) and fewer negative emotions (disgusted, disagreeable, and bad) than those of the control group. For the varying levels of cooking and serving robots, the ratings of consumers' expected liking and willingness to try food were significantly decreased (<em>p</em> &lt; 0.05) as robots are became more human-like. In the emotional change, the lower the level of anthropomorphism, the stronger the positive emotions and the weaker. Considering the current labor shortages and rising costs in food service sector, appropriate designed robots can effectively enhance consumer acceptance of robot-prepared or robot-served food.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":323,"journal":{"name":"Food Research International","volume":"214 ","pages":"Article 116626"},"PeriodicalIF":7.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Food Research International","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0963996925009640","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The utilization of robots in the food industry, including restaurants and cafés, has increased in recent years. This study investigated participants' responses to robots in the serving and cooking domains, which require varying degrees of consumer interactions. This study examined expected liking and willingness to try food prepared or served by robots at three levels of anthropomorphism, along with associated emotional responses. Participants were divided into a group that received positive information about robot (n = 845) and a control group (n = 870). Compared to the control group, the informed group showed significantly higher ratings for the expected liking (p < 0.05) and willingness to try (p < 0.05) food from cooking robots. For serving robots, only willingness to try (p < 0.05) was higher in the informed group. The informed group also demonstrated more positive emotions (adventurous, secure, curious, daring, interested, and trusting) and fewer negative emotions (disgusted, disagreeable, and bad) than those of the control group. For the varying levels of cooking and serving robots, the ratings of consumers' expected liking and willingness to try food were significantly decreased (p < 0.05) as robots are became more human-like. In the emotional change, the lower the level of anthropomorphism, the stronger the positive emotions and the weaker. Considering the current labor shortages and rising costs in food service sector, appropriate designed robots can effectively enhance consumer acceptance of robot-prepared or robot-served food.
烹饪和食物服务机器人的设计图像和信息对消费者的喜好、尝试食物的意愿和情绪反应的影响
近年来,包括餐馆和咖啡馆在内的食品行业对机器人的使用有所增加。这项研究调查了参与者在服务和烹饪领域对机器人的反应,这些领域需要不同程度的消费者互动。这项研究在三个拟人化的层次上考察了人们对机器人准备或提供的食物的预期喜欢程度和意愿,以及相关的情绪反应。参与者被分为收到关于机器人正面信息的组(n = 845)和对照组(n = 870)。与对照组相比,知情组在预期喜欢程度上表现出明显更高的评分(p <;0.05)和尝试意愿(p <;0.05)烹饪机器人的食物。对于服务型机器人,只有尝试的意愿(p <;0.05)。与对照组相比,知情组也表现出更多的积极情绪(冒险、安全、好奇、大胆、感兴趣和信任)和更少的消极情绪(厌恶、不愉快和坏)。对于不同级别的烹饪和服务机器人,消费者对食物的预期喜欢度和尝试意愿的评分显著下降(p <;0.05),因为机器人变得越来越像人类。在情绪变化中,拟人化水平越低,积极情绪越强,越弱。考虑到目前食品服务行业劳动力短缺和成本上升,适当设计的机器人可以有效提高消费者对机器人制作或机器人服务食品的接受程度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Food Research International
Food Research International 工程技术-食品科技
CiteScore
12.50
自引率
7.40%
发文量
1183
审稿时长
79 days
期刊介绍: Food Research International serves as a rapid dissemination platform for significant and impactful research in food science, technology, engineering, and nutrition. The journal focuses on publishing novel, high-quality, and high-impact review papers, original research papers, and letters to the editors across various disciplines in the science and technology of food. Additionally, it follows a policy of publishing special issues on topical and emergent subjects in food research or related areas. Selected, peer-reviewed papers from scientific meetings, workshops, and conferences on the science, technology, and engineering of foods are also featured in special issues.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信