Martin Südmeyer, David J Pedrosa, Frank Siebecker, Carolin Arlt, Jaakko Kopra, Wolfgang H Jost
{"title":"Real-world disease burden and planned treatment optimization after MANAGE-PD implementation in Germany: a cross-sectional study.","authors":"Martin Südmeyer, David J Pedrosa, Frank Siebecker, Carolin Arlt, Jaakko Kopra, Wolfgang H Jost","doi":"10.1186/s42466-025-00383-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In Germany, the approach to treatment optimization for patients with advanced Parkinson's disease (PD) is considered somewhat conservative. The MANAGE-PD tool ( www.managepd.eu ) was developed to help identify patients with advanced PD and to facilitate treatment decision making and appropriate allocation of patients to device-aided therapies (DAT). This prospective, non-interventional study aimed to investigate the real-world disease burden of PD and treatment optimization after MANAGE-PD implementation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Adult PD patients (N = 278) visited specialist clinics and neurologist's practices in Germany in 2022. Disease burden was assessed using the Unified PD rating scale (UPDRS parts II-IV), the non-motor symptoms scale (NMSS) and the 8-item Parkinson's disease Questionnaire (PDQ-8). Data on planned treatment changes were collected. Data were analyzed by disease control categories according to the MANAGE-PD tool.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Mean scores for motor and non-motor symptoms, quality of life, and comorbidity burden were worse in patients with lower disease control measured by MANAGE-PD. For 52.8% of patients in Category 2 (inadequately controlled-might benefit from oral optimization), no change in oral treatment was planned. No change in oral treatment and no DAT initiation was planned for 37.9% and 65.0% of patients in Category 3 (inadequately controlled-might benefit from DAT). Patient refusal and needing more time to decide were the most common reasons for not making treatment changes.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study supports the validity of MANAGE-PD by showing its high association with disease burden and emphasizes the importance of timely provision of necessary information to enable informed decisions about treatment optimization.</p>","PeriodicalId":94156,"journal":{"name":"Neurological research and practice","volume":"7 1","pages":"31"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12067699/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurological research and practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s42466-025-00383-2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: In Germany, the approach to treatment optimization for patients with advanced Parkinson's disease (PD) is considered somewhat conservative. The MANAGE-PD tool ( www.managepd.eu ) was developed to help identify patients with advanced PD and to facilitate treatment decision making and appropriate allocation of patients to device-aided therapies (DAT). This prospective, non-interventional study aimed to investigate the real-world disease burden of PD and treatment optimization after MANAGE-PD implementation.
Methods: Adult PD patients (N = 278) visited specialist clinics and neurologist's practices in Germany in 2022. Disease burden was assessed using the Unified PD rating scale (UPDRS parts II-IV), the non-motor symptoms scale (NMSS) and the 8-item Parkinson's disease Questionnaire (PDQ-8). Data on planned treatment changes were collected. Data were analyzed by disease control categories according to the MANAGE-PD tool.
Results: Mean scores for motor and non-motor symptoms, quality of life, and comorbidity burden were worse in patients with lower disease control measured by MANAGE-PD. For 52.8% of patients in Category 2 (inadequately controlled-might benefit from oral optimization), no change in oral treatment was planned. No change in oral treatment and no DAT initiation was planned for 37.9% and 65.0% of patients in Category 3 (inadequately controlled-might benefit from DAT). Patient refusal and needing more time to decide were the most common reasons for not making treatment changes.
Conclusions: This study supports the validity of MANAGE-PD by showing its high association with disease burden and emphasizes the importance of timely provision of necessary information to enable informed decisions about treatment optimization.