Evaluation of Modified QuEChERS Using Small-Scale SPE for the Analysis of Organophosphorus Pesticides in Spinach.

Takamitsu Otake, Kaori Machida, Keisuke Nakamura
{"title":"Evaluation of Modified QuEChERS Using Small-Scale SPE for the Analysis of Organophosphorus Pesticides in Spinach.","authors":"Takamitsu Otake, Kaori Machida, Keisuke Nakamura","doi":"10.1093/jaoacint/qsaf033","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The Quick, Easy, Cheap, Effective, Rugged, and Safe (QuEChERS) method has been widely applied to various compounds and matrices. However, the clean-up process of QuEChERS with dispersive solid-phase extraction (d-SPE) is considered to be not always sufficient. Therefore, a modified QuEChERS using small-scale SPE (abbreviated as \"modified QuEChERS\") for the clean-up process has seen an increasing number of users in Japan; it is therefore necessary to evaluate its performance.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the performance of modified QuEChERS for the analysis of nine organophosphorus pesticides (OPPs) in spinach, and to compare the various parameters among modified QuEChERS, QuEChERS, and the Japanese official multiresidue method (JOMM).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The modified QuEChERS was evaluated by a recovery test using blank spinach samples and quantification using a pesticides-containing quality control spinach sample. A matrix effect was also evaluated for gas chromatography with mass spectrometry (GC/MS) with the stomach-shaped spiral large volume injection (LVI). Various parameters including accuracy, time, cost, and clean-up effect were compared among modified QuEChERS, QuEChERS, and JOMM.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean recoveries, the intra-day repeatability, and the inter-day reproducibility for modified QuEChERS were acceptable according to the validation guideline. The concentration of fenitrothion in the pesticides-containing quality control spinach sample obtained by modified QuEChERS was comparable that obtained by QuEChERS and JOMM. It was found that the clean-up of the blank spinach sample by modified QuEChERS using small-scale SPE can be more effective than that by QuEChERS using d-SPE. A matrix effect was newly evaluated in our analysis by GC/MS with the stomach-shaped spiral LVI.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The modified QuEChERS is an accurate and simple method of analyzing OPPs in spinach.</p><p><strong>Highlight: </strong>The modified QuEChERS is not only accurate but also a fast, cost-effective, and environment-friendly method for analyzing OPPs in spinach.</p>","PeriodicalId":94064,"journal":{"name":"Journal of AOAC International","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of AOAC International","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jaoacint/qsaf033","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The Quick, Easy, Cheap, Effective, Rugged, and Safe (QuEChERS) method has been widely applied to various compounds and matrices. However, the clean-up process of QuEChERS with dispersive solid-phase extraction (d-SPE) is considered to be not always sufficient. Therefore, a modified QuEChERS using small-scale SPE (abbreviated as "modified QuEChERS") for the clean-up process has seen an increasing number of users in Japan; it is therefore necessary to evaluate its performance.

Objective: To evaluate the performance of modified QuEChERS for the analysis of nine organophosphorus pesticides (OPPs) in spinach, and to compare the various parameters among modified QuEChERS, QuEChERS, and the Japanese official multiresidue method (JOMM).

Methods: The modified QuEChERS was evaluated by a recovery test using blank spinach samples and quantification using a pesticides-containing quality control spinach sample. A matrix effect was also evaluated for gas chromatography with mass spectrometry (GC/MS) with the stomach-shaped spiral large volume injection (LVI). Various parameters including accuracy, time, cost, and clean-up effect were compared among modified QuEChERS, QuEChERS, and JOMM.

Results: The mean recoveries, the intra-day repeatability, and the inter-day reproducibility for modified QuEChERS were acceptable according to the validation guideline. The concentration of fenitrothion in the pesticides-containing quality control spinach sample obtained by modified QuEChERS was comparable that obtained by QuEChERS and JOMM. It was found that the clean-up of the blank spinach sample by modified QuEChERS using small-scale SPE can be more effective than that by QuEChERS using d-SPE. A matrix effect was newly evaluated in our analysis by GC/MS with the stomach-shaped spiral LVI.

Conclusion: The modified QuEChERS is an accurate and simple method of analyzing OPPs in spinach.

Highlight: The modified QuEChERS is not only accurate but also a fast, cost-effective, and environment-friendly method for analyzing OPPs in spinach.

改良QuEChERS小型固相萃取法分析菠菜中有机磷农药的评价
背景:快速,简单,廉价,有效,坚固,安全(QuEChERS)方法已广泛应用于各种化合物和基质。然而,用分散固相萃取(d-SPE)净化QuEChERS的过程被认为并不总是充分的。因此,在日本,使用小规模SPE(缩写为“modified QuEChERS”)进行清理过程的改良QuEChERS用户越来越多;因此,有必要对其性能进行评估。目的:评价改良QuEChERS在菠菜中9种有机磷农药(OPPs)分析中的性能,并比较改良QuEChERS、QuEChERS和日本官方多重残留法(JOMM)的各项参数。方法:采用空白菠菜样品回收率试验和含农药质量控制菠菜样品定量评价改良后的QuEChERS。并对胃形螺旋大体积注射剂(LVI)的气相色谱-质谱(GC/MS)基质效应进行了评价。比较了改进后的QuEChERS、QuEChERS和JOMM的精度、时间、成本和清理效果等参数。结果:修改后的QuEChERS的平均回收率、日内重复性和日内重复性均符合验证指南要求。用改良的QuEChERS法测得的含农药质量对照菠菜中杀虫磷的浓度与用QuEChERS法和JOMM法测得的浓度相当。结果表明,改良QuEChERS对空白菠菜样品的净化效果优于d-SPE。在胃形螺旋LVI的气相色谱/质谱分析中,我们首次评价了基质效应。结论:改进的QuEChERS是一种准确、简便的分析菠菜中OPPs的方法。重点:改进的QuEChERS不仅准确,而且是一种快速、经济、环保的分析菠菜中OPPs的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信