Family Availability, 'Kinlessness', COVID Stringency, and Loneliness in 26 Countries.

IF 1.8 3区 社会学 Q2 GERONTOLOGY
Christine A Mair, Bruno Arpino, Radoslaw Antczak, Nekehia T Quashie
{"title":"Family Availability, 'Kinlessness', COVID Stringency, and Loneliness in 26 Countries.","authors":"Christine A Mair, Bruno Arpino, Radoslaw Antczak, Nekehia T Quashie","doi":"10.1177/01640275251334624","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Loneliness became an increasing concern during the COVID-19 pandemic, especially as countries enacted \"physical distancing\" mitigation measures. Under these conditions, older adults with limited family availability (e.g., unpartnered, childless, and \"kinless\") might have been at higher loneliness risk, or perhaps were more accustomed to less social interaction. Using individual-level data from the Survey of Health, Ageing and Retirement in Europe (SHARE) and country-level data from the Oxford Coronavirus Government Response Tracker (OxCGRT), we analyzed loneliness outcomes for 34,943 older Europeans in 26 countries to examine associations between various types of family availability and loneliness under different COVID-19 stringency conditions. More stringent COVID-19 country contexts and being unpartnered were associated with loneliness, but \"kinless\" older adults had similar risk of loneliness as unpartnered older adults, underscoring the highly protective role of partnership. We discuss these findings considering the growing global population with limited family ties and make recommendations for future pandemic mitigation efforts.</p>","PeriodicalId":47983,"journal":{"name":"Research on Aging","volume":" ","pages":"1640275251334624"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research on Aging","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/01640275251334624","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Loneliness became an increasing concern during the COVID-19 pandemic, especially as countries enacted "physical distancing" mitigation measures. Under these conditions, older adults with limited family availability (e.g., unpartnered, childless, and "kinless") might have been at higher loneliness risk, or perhaps were more accustomed to less social interaction. Using individual-level data from the Survey of Health, Ageing and Retirement in Europe (SHARE) and country-level data from the Oxford Coronavirus Government Response Tracker (OxCGRT), we analyzed loneliness outcomes for 34,943 older Europeans in 26 countries to examine associations between various types of family availability and loneliness under different COVID-19 stringency conditions. More stringent COVID-19 country contexts and being unpartnered were associated with loneliness, but "kinless" older adults had similar risk of loneliness as unpartnered older adults, underscoring the highly protective role of partnership. We discuss these findings considering the growing global population with limited family ties and make recommendations for future pandemic mitigation efforts.

26个国家的家庭可用性、“无亲属性”、COVID严谨性和孤独感。
在2019冠状病毒病大流行期间,孤独感日益成为人们关注的问题,特别是在各国制定了“保持身体距离”缓解措施之后。在这些条件下,家庭可用性有限的老年人(例如,无伴侣,无子女和“无亲属”)可能有更高的孤独风险,或者可能更习惯于较少的社会互动。我们利用欧洲健康、老龄化和退休调查(SHARE)的个人数据和牛津冠状病毒政府应对追踪器(OxCGRT)的国家级数据,分析了26个国家34,943名欧洲老年人的孤独结果,以研究不同COVID-19严格程度下各种类型的家庭可用性与孤独之间的关系。更严格的COVID-19国家背景和无伴侣与孤独感有关,但“无亲属”的老年人与无伴侣的老年人有相似的孤独感风险,这凸显了伙伴关系的高度保护作用。考虑到全球家庭关系有限的人口不断增长,我们讨论了这些发现,并为未来的大流行缓解工作提出了建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Research on Aging
Research on Aging GERONTOLOGY-
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
59
期刊介绍: Research on Aging is an interdisciplinary journal designed to reflect the expanding role of research in the field of social gerontology. Research on Aging exists to provide for publication of research in the broad range of disciplines concerned with aging. Scholars from the disciplines of sociology, geriatrics, history, psychology, anthropology, public health, economics, political science, criminal justice, and social work are encouraged to contribute articles to the journal. Emphasis will be on materials of broad scope and cross-disciplinary interest. Assessment of the current state of knowledge is as important as provision of an outlet for new knowledge, so critical and review articles are welcomed. Systematic attention to particular topics will also be featured.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信