Efficacy of MARPE in adolescent maxillary expansion: Suture correlation and clinical outcomes

IF 2 3区 医学 Q2 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Wei Li , Fengxian Li , Zhuo Yu
{"title":"Efficacy of MARPE in adolescent maxillary expansion: Suture correlation and clinical outcomes","authors":"Wei Li ,&nbsp;Fengxian Li ,&nbsp;Zhuo Yu","doi":"10.1016/j.jormas.2025.102403","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>The aim of this paper was to explore the correlation between anchorage screw-assisted expansion and the maxillary suture in the treatment of adolescents with rapid maxillary expansion (RME) using miniscrew anchorage.</div></div><div><h3>Materials and methods</h3><div><span>A total of 60 adolescent patients with narrow maxillary arches, treated in the orthodontic department of our hospital from March 2021 to September 2022 and who underwent implant-assisted rapid maxillary expansion technology, were recruited for this study. The patients were divided into two groups: the control group (</span><em>n</em> = 30), who received traditional expansion technology, and the observation group (<em>n</em><span> = 30), who received Micro-Screw Anchorage Rapid Maxillary Expansion (MARPE) technology. The general data of the patients were collected, and cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) was used to measure the buccal maxillary width, palatal maxillary width, midpalatal suture expansion, maxillary skeletal expander expansion, and molar angle before and after treatment.</span></div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Before treatment, there were no significant differences in maxillary width (buccal and palatal) or tooth angle between the two groups (<em>P</em> &gt; 0.05). After treatment, the observation group showed a significantly greater increase in maxillary width (both buccal and palatal) and a more significant reduction in tooth angle compared to the control group (<em>P</em> &lt; 0.05). The observation group also had a greater amount of bone expansion (<em>P</em><span> &lt; 0.05), though alveolar bone bending was similar between groups (</span><em>P</em> &gt; 0.05). The observation group had a higher effective rate and lower ineffective rate (<em>P</em> &lt; 0.05), with no significant difference in adverse reactions (<em>P</em> &gt; 0.05).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Compared with the traditional expansion technique, the MARPE technique using anchorage nails as a fixed fulcrum can more effectively achieve maxillary expansion. By precisely controlling the application of expansion forces, MARPE promotes uniform expansion of the maxillary suture, improving the stability and predictability of the treatment.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":55993,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Stomatology Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery","volume":"126 4","pages":"Article 102403"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Stomatology Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2468785525001892","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

The aim of this paper was to explore the correlation between anchorage screw-assisted expansion and the maxillary suture in the treatment of adolescents with rapid maxillary expansion (RME) using miniscrew anchorage.

Materials and methods

A total of 60 adolescent patients with narrow maxillary arches, treated in the orthodontic department of our hospital from March 2021 to September 2022 and who underwent implant-assisted rapid maxillary expansion technology, were recruited for this study. The patients were divided into two groups: the control group (n = 30), who received traditional expansion technology, and the observation group (n = 30), who received Micro-Screw Anchorage Rapid Maxillary Expansion (MARPE) technology. The general data of the patients were collected, and cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) was used to measure the buccal maxillary width, palatal maxillary width, midpalatal suture expansion, maxillary skeletal expander expansion, and molar angle before and after treatment.

Results

Before treatment, there were no significant differences in maxillary width (buccal and palatal) or tooth angle between the two groups (P > 0.05). After treatment, the observation group showed a significantly greater increase in maxillary width (both buccal and palatal) and a more significant reduction in tooth angle compared to the control group (P < 0.05). The observation group also had a greater amount of bone expansion (P < 0.05), though alveolar bone bending was similar between groups (P > 0.05). The observation group had a higher effective rate and lower ineffective rate (P < 0.05), with no significant difference in adverse reactions (P > 0.05).

Conclusion

Compared with the traditional expansion technique, the MARPE technique using anchorage nails as a fixed fulcrum can more effectively achieve maxillary expansion. By precisely controlling the application of expansion forces, MARPE promotes uniform expansion of the maxillary suture, improving the stability and predictability of the treatment.
MARPE在青少年上颌扩张中的疗效:缝线相关性与临床结果。
目的:探讨微型支抗治疗青少年上颌快速扩张(RME)时,支抗螺钉辅助扩张与上颌缝合的相关性。材料与方法:本研究招募于2021年3月至2022年9月在我院正畸科接受种植体辅助上颌快速扩张技术治疗的60例上颌弓狭窄青少年患者。将患者分为两组:对照组(n=30)采用传统扩展技术,观察组(n=30)采用微螺钉支抗快速上颌扩展(MARPE)技术。收集患者一般资料,采用锥形束ct (cone beam computed tomography, CBCT)测量治疗前后上颌颊宽、上颌腭宽、中腭缝线扩张、上颌骨扩张器扩张、磨牙角。结果:治疗前,两组患者上颌宽度(颊、腭)及牙角比较,差异均无统计学意义(P < 0.05)。治疗后,观察组上颌(颊、腭)宽度增加明显大于对照组,牙角减小明显大于对照组(P0.05)。观察组有效率高于对照组,无效率低于对照组(P0.05)。结论:与传统的上颌扩展技术相比,以锚钉为固定支点的MARPE技术可以更有效地实现上颌扩展。通过精确控制扩张力的应用,MARPE促进上颌缝线均匀扩张,提高治疗的稳定性和可预测性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Stomatology Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery
Journal of Stomatology Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Surgery, Dentistry, Oral Surgery and Medicine, Otorhinolaryngology and Facial Plastic Surgery
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
9.10%
发文量
0
审稿时长
23 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信